构建值得信赖的神经符号人工智能系统:一致性、可靠性、可解释性和安全性

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Ai Magazine Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1002/aaai.12149
Manas Gaur, Amit Sheth
{"title":"构建值得信赖的神经符号人工智能系统:一致性、可靠性、可解释性和安全性","authors":"Manas Gaur,&nbsp;Amit Sheth","doi":"10.1002/aaai.12149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Explainability and Safety engender trust. These require a model to exhibit consistency and reliability. To achieve these, it is necessary to use and analyze <i>data</i> and <i>knowledge</i> with statistical and symbolic AI methods relevant to the AI application––neither alone will do. Consequently, we argue and seek to demonstrate that the NeuroSymbolic AI approach is better suited for making AI a trusted AI system. We present the CREST framework that shows how <b>C</b>onsistency, <b>R</b>eliability, user-level <b>E</b>xplainability, and <b>S</b>afety are built on NeuroSymbolic methods that use data and knowledge to support requirements for critical applications such as health and well-being. This article focuses on Large Language Models (LLMs) as the chosen AI system within the CREST framework. LLMs have garnered substantial attention from researchers due to their versatility in handling a broad array of natural language processing (NLP) scenarios. As examples, ChatGPT and Google's MedPaLM have emerged as highly promising platforms for providing information in general and health-related queries, respectively. Nevertheless, these models remain black boxes despite incorporating human feedback and instruction-guided tuning. For instance, ChatGPT can generate <i>unsafe responses</i> despite instituting safety guardrails. CREST presents a plausible approach harnessing procedural and graph-based knowledge within a NeuroSymbolic framework to shed light on the challenges associated with LLMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7854,"journal":{"name":"Ai Magazine","volume":"45 1","pages":"139-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.12149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building trustworthy NeuroSymbolic AI Systems: Consistency, reliability, explainability, and safety\",\"authors\":\"Manas Gaur,&nbsp;Amit Sheth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aaai.12149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Explainability and Safety engender trust. These require a model to exhibit consistency and reliability. To achieve these, it is necessary to use and analyze <i>data</i> and <i>knowledge</i> with statistical and symbolic AI methods relevant to the AI application––neither alone will do. Consequently, we argue and seek to demonstrate that the NeuroSymbolic AI approach is better suited for making AI a trusted AI system. We present the CREST framework that shows how <b>C</b>onsistency, <b>R</b>eliability, user-level <b>E</b>xplainability, and <b>S</b>afety are built on NeuroSymbolic methods that use data and knowledge to support requirements for critical applications such as health and well-being. This article focuses on Large Language Models (LLMs) as the chosen AI system within the CREST framework. LLMs have garnered substantial attention from researchers due to their versatility in handling a broad array of natural language processing (NLP) scenarios. As examples, ChatGPT and Google's MedPaLM have emerged as highly promising platforms for providing information in general and health-related queries, respectively. Nevertheless, these models remain black boxes despite incorporating human feedback and instruction-guided tuning. For instance, ChatGPT can generate <i>unsafe responses</i> despite instituting safety guardrails. CREST presents a plausible approach harnessing procedural and graph-based knowledge within a NeuroSymbolic framework to shed light on the challenges associated with LLMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ai Magazine\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"139-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.12149\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ai Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.12149\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.12149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可解释性和安全性可赢得信任。这就要求模型表现出一致性和可靠性。要实现这些目标,就必须使用与人工智能应用相关的统计和符号人工智能方法来使用和分析数据与知识--两者缺一不可。因此,我们认为并试图证明神经符号人工智能方法更适合使人工智能成为可信赖的人工智能系统。我们提出了 CREST 框架,该框架展示了一致性、可靠性、用户级可解释性和安全性是如何建立在神经符号方法上的,这些方法利用数据和知识来支持健康和福祉等关键应用的要求。本文重点介绍大型语言模型(LLM),将其作为 CREST 框架内的首选人工智能系统。LLM 在处理各种自然语言处理 (NLP) 场景方面具有多功能性,因此受到了研究人员的广泛关注。例如,ChatGPT 和谷歌的 MedPaLM 已分别成为提供一般信息和健康相关查询的极具前景的平台。尽管如此,这些模型仍然是黑盒子,尽管结合了人类反馈和指令指导的调整。例如,尽管 ChatGPT 设置了安全防护栏,但仍可能产生不安全的回复。CREST 在神经符号框架内提出了一种利用程序和基于图的知识的可行方法,以揭示与 LLMs 相关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building trustworthy NeuroSymbolic AI Systems: Consistency, reliability, explainability, and safety

Explainability and Safety engender trust. These require a model to exhibit consistency and reliability. To achieve these, it is necessary to use and analyze data and knowledge with statistical and symbolic AI methods relevant to the AI application––neither alone will do. Consequently, we argue and seek to demonstrate that the NeuroSymbolic AI approach is better suited for making AI a trusted AI system. We present the CREST framework that shows how Consistency, Reliability, user-level Explainability, and Safety are built on NeuroSymbolic methods that use data and knowledge to support requirements for critical applications such as health and well-being. This article focuses on Large Language Models (LLMs) as the chosen AI system within the CREST framework. LLMs have garnered substantial attention from researchers due to their versatility in handling a broad array of natural language processing (NLP) scenarios. As examples, ChatGPT and Google's MedPaLM have emerged as highly promising platforms for providing information in general and health-related queries, respectively. Nevertheless, these models remain black boxes despite incorporating human feedback and instruction-guided tuning. For instance, ChatGPT can generate unsafe responses despite instituting safety guardrails. CREST presents a plausible approach harnessing procedural and graph-based knowledge within a NeuroSymbolic framework to shed light on the challenges associated with LLMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ai Magazine
Ai Magazine 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AI Magazine publishes original articles that are reasonably self-contained and aimed at a broad spectrum of the AI community. Technical content should be kept to a minimum. In general, the magazine does not publish articles that have been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The magazine welcomes the contribution of articles on the theory and practice of AI as well as general survey articles, tutorial articles on timely topics, conference or symposia or workshop reports, and timely columns on topics of interest to AI scientists.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information AI fairness in practice: Paradigm, challenges, and prospects Toward the confident deployment of real-world reinforcement learning agents Towards robust visual understanding: A paradigm shift in computer vision from recognition to reasoning Efficient and robust sequential decision making algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1