种子与土壤:结直肠癌原发病灶与不同器官部位转移瘤之间的共识分子亚组(CMS)和肿瘤微环境特征

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.2147/cmar.s441675
Qingqing Luo, Yibo Quan, Wei Liu, Zixin Wu, Wenjing Qiu, Wenlong Liang, Ping Yang, Qing Huang, Guanwei Li, Jianchang Wei, Qiang Wang, Fei Shen, Wanglin Li, Feng He, Jie Cao
{"title":"种子与土壤:结直肠癌原发病灶与不同器官部位转移瘤之间的共识分子亚组(CMS)和肿瘤微环境特征","authors":"Qingqing Luo, Yibo Quan, Wei Liu, Zixin Wu, Wenjing Qiu, Wenlong Liang, Ping Yang, Qing Huang, Guanwei Li, Jianchang Wei, Qiang Wang, Fei Shen, Wanglin Li, Feng He, Jie Cao","doi":"10.2147/cmar.s441675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) are mainly used for biological interpretability and clinical stratification of colorectal cancer (CRC) in primary tumors (PT) but few in metastases. The heterogeneity of CMS distribution in metastases and the concordance of CMS between PT and metastases still lack sufficient study. We used CMS to classify CRC metastases and combine it with histopathological analysis to explore differences between PT and distant metastases.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> We obtained gene expression profiles for 942 PT samples from TCGA database (n=376) and GEO database (n=566), as well as 442 metastasis samples from GEO database. Among these, 765 PT samples and 442 metastasis samples were confidently identified with CMS using the “CMS classifier” and enrolled for analysis. Clinicopathological manifestation and CMS classification of CRC metastases were assessed with data from GEO, TCGA, and cBioPortal. Overall, 105 PT-metastasis pairs were extracted from 10 GEO datasets to assess CMS concordance. Tumor microenvironment (TME) features between PT and metastases were analyzed by immune-stromal infiltration with ESTIMATE and xCell algorithms. Finally, TME features were validated with multiplex immunohistochemistry in 27 PT-metastasis pairs we retrospectively collected.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Up to 64% of CRC metastases exhibited concordant CMS groups with matched PT, and the TME of metastases was similar to that of PT. For most common distant metastases, liver metastases were predominantly CMS2 and lung and peritoneal metastases were mainly CMS4, highlighting “seed” of tumor cells of different CMS groups had a preference for metastasis to “soil” of specific organs. Compared with PT, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) reduced in liver metastases, CD4+T cells and M2-like macrophages increased in lung metastases, and M2-like macrophages and CAF increased in peritoneal metastases.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Our findings underscore the importance of CMS-guided specific organ monitoring and treatment post-primary tumor surgery for patients. Differences in immune-stromal infiltration among different metastases provide targeted therapeutic opportunities for metastatic CRC.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> colorectal cancer, primary tumors, metastases, consensus molecular subtypes, tumor microenvironment<br/>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seed and Soil: Consensus Molecular Subgroups (CMS) and Tumor Microenvironment Features Between Primary Lesions and Metastases of Different Organ Sites in Colorectal Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Qingqing Luo, Yibo Quan, Wei Liu, Zixin Wu, Wenjing Qiu, Wenlong Liang, Ping Yang, Qing Huang, Guanwei Li, Jianchang Wei, Qiang Wang, Fei Shen, Wanglin Li, Feng He, Jie Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/cmar.s441675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) are mainly used for biological interpretability and clinical stratification of colorectal cancer (CRC) in primary tumors (PT) but few in metastases. The heterogeneity of CMS distribution in metastases and the concordance of CMS between PT and metastases still lack sufficient study. We used CMS to classify CRC metastases and combine it with histopathological analysis to explore differences between PT and distant metastases.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> We obtained gene expression profiles for 942 PT samples from TCGA database (n=376) and GEO database (n=566), as well as 442 metastasis samples from GEO database. Among these, 765 PT samples and 442 metastasis samples were confidently identified with CMS using the “CMS classifier” and enrolled for analysis. Clinicopathological manifestation and CMS classification of CRC metastases were assessed with data from GEO, TCGA, and cBioPortal. Overall, 105 PT-metastasis pairs were extracted from 10 GEO datasets to assess CMS concordance. Tumor microenvironment (TME) features between PT and metastases were analyzed by immune-stromal infiltration with ESTIMATE and xCell algorithms. Finally, TME features were validated with multiplex immunohistochemistry in 27 PT-metastasis pairs we retrospectively collected.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Up to 64% of CRC metastases exhibited concordant CMS groups with matched PT, and the TME of metastases was similar to that of PT. For most common distant metastases, liver metastases were predominantly CMS2 and lung and peritoneal metastases were mainly CMS4, highlighting “seed” of tumor cells of different CMS groups had a preference for metastasis to “soil” of specific organs. Compared with PT, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) reduced in liver metastases, CD4+T cells and M2-like macrophages increased in lung metastases, and M2-like macrophages and CAF increased in peritoneal metastases.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Our findings underscore the importance of CMS-guided specific organ monitoring and treatment post-primary tumor surgery for patients. Differences in immune-stromal infiltration among different metastases provide targeted therapeutic opportunities for metastatic CRC.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> colorectal cancer, primary tumors, metastases, consensus molecular subtypes, tumor microenvironment<br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s441675\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s441675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:共识分子亚型(CMS)主要用于结直肠癌(CRC)原发肿瘤(PT)的生物学解释和临床分层,但很少用于转移瘤。对于 CMS 在转移瘤中分布的异质性以及 CMS 在原发肿瘤和转移瘤之间的一致性仍缺乏充分的研究。我们利用 CMS 对 CRC 转移瘤进行分类,并结合组织病理学分析来探讨 PT 与远处转移瘤之间的差异:我们从TCGA数据库(n=376)和GEO数据库(n=566)获得了942个PT样本的基因表达谱,并从GEO数据库获得了442个转移样本的基因表达谱。其中,765 份 PT 样本和 442 份转移样本经 "CMS 分类器 "鉴定为 CMS,并纳入分析。通过GEO、TCGA和cBioPortal的数据评估了CRC转移瘤的临床病理表现和CMS分类。总共从 10 个 GEO 数据集中提取了 105 对 PT-转移灶,以评估 CMS 的一致性。利用ESTIMATE和xCell算法,通过免疫间质浸润分析了PT和转移灶之间的肿瘤微环境(TME)特征。最后,在我们回顾性收集的27对PT-转移瘤中,通过多重免疫组化验证了TME特征:结果:多达 64% 的 CRC 转移灶与匹配的 PT 表现出一致的 CMS 组,转移灶的 TME 与 PT 相似。在最常见的远处转移灶中,肝转移灶以CMS2为主,肺和腹膜转移灶以CMS4为主,这表明不同CMS组肿瘤细胞的 "种子 "更倾向于向特定器官的 "土壤 "转移。与PT相比,肝转移中癌相关成纤维细胞(CAF)减少,肺转移中CD4+T细胞和M2样巨噬细胞增加,腹膜转移中M2样巨噬细胞和CAF增加:我们的研究结果强调了在 CMS 指导下对原发性肿瘤术后患者进行特定器官监测和治疗的重要性。关键词:结直肠癌;原发肿瘤;转移瘤;共识分子亚型;肿瘤微环境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seed and Soil: Consensus Molecular Subgroups (CMS) and Tumor Microenvironment Features Between Primary Lesions and Metastases of Different Organ Sites in Colorectal Cancer
Purpose: Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) are mainly used for biological interpretability and clinical stratification of colorectal cancer (CRC) in primary tumors (PT) but few in metastases. The heterogeneity of CMS distribution in metastases and the concordance of CMS between PT and metastases still lack sufficient study. We used CMS to classify CRC metastases and combine it with histopathological analysis to explore differences between PT and distant metastases.
Patients and Methods: We obtained gene expression profiles for 942 PT samples from TCGA database (n=376) and GEO database (n=566), as well as 442 metastasis samples from GEO database. Among these, 765 PT samples and 442 metastasis samples were confidently identified with CMS using the “CMS classifier” and enrolled for analysis. Clinicopathological manifestation and CMS classification of CRC metastases were assessed with data from GEO, TCGA, and cBioPortal. Overall, 105 PT-metastasis pairs were extracted from 10 GEO datasets to assess CMS concordance. Tumor microenvironment (TME) features between PT and metastases were analyzed by immune-stromal infiltration with ESTIMATE and xCell algorithms. Finally, TME features were validated with multiplex immunohistochemistry in 27 PT-metastasis pairs we retrospectively collected.
Results: Up to 64% of CRC metastases exhibited concordant CMS groups with matched PT, and the TME of metastases was similar to that of PT. For most common distant metastases, liver metastases were predominantly CMS2 and lung and peritoneal metastases were mainly CMS4, highlighting “seed” of tumor cells of different CMS groups had a preference for metastasis to “soil” of specific organs. Compared with PT, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) reduced in liver metastases, CD4+T cells and M2-like macrophages increased in lung metastases, and M2-like macrophages and CAF increased in peritoneal metastases.
Conclusion: Our findings underscore the importance of CMS-guided specific organ monitoring and treatment post-primary tumor surgery for patients. Differences in immune-stromal infiltration among different metastases provide targeted therapeutic opportunities for metastatic CRC.

Keywords: colorectal cancer, primary tumors, metastases, consensus molecular subtypes, tumor microenvironment
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Sociodemographic Factors and Clinical Aspects on the Quality of Life of Surgically Treated Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Mixed Medullary-Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with Mixed Lymph Node Metastases: a Case Report and Review of the Literature. Integrating PARP Inhibitors in mCRPC Therapy: Current Strategies and Emerging Trends Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Mortality in Female Breast Cancer Patients Considering Lifestyle Factors Ultrasound Diagnosis of Bilateral Primary Breast Burkitt Lymphoma in a 28-Year-Old Lactating Patient: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1