预测球囊闭塞试验结果的患者特异性威利斯圈血流模型。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1111/jon.13198
Jianmin Li, Daniel Li, Ali Alaraj, Xinjian Du, Kezhou Wang, Fady T. Charbel
{"title":"预测球囊闭塞试验结果的患者特异性威利斯圈血流模型。","authors":"Jianmin Li,&nbsp;Daniel Li,&nbsp;Ali Alaraj,&nbsp;Xinjian Du,&nbsp;Kezhou Wang,&nbsp;Fady T. Charbel","doi":"10.1111/jon.13198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Balloon test occlusion (BTO) evaluates cerebral ischemic tolerance before internal carotid artery (ICA) sacrifice but carries risks like dissection and thrombosis. This study introduces a new approach using a patient-specific circle of Willis (COW) blood flow model, based on non-invasive quantitative MR angiography (qMRA) measurements, to predict the outcomes of BTO.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We developed individualized COW blood flow models for 43 patients undergoing BTO. These models simulated blood flow and pressure under normal conditions and with the ICA occlusion. We then compared the model's predictions of blood flow changes due to the simulated ICA occlusion to actual qMRA measurements before the BTO.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For all 31 BTO failures, the ipsilateral hemisphere showed an average flow decrease of 15 ± 10% (mean ± standard deviation), compared to 3 ± 2% in the contralateral hemisphere. In all 12 BTO passes, these figures were 6 ± 3% and 1 ± 0.8%, respectively. Notably, all BTO passes had less than a 10% reduction in the ipsilateral hemisphere. In contrast, 65% of BTO failures and 67% single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) failures exhibited a decrease of 10% or more in the same region.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Blood flow reduction exceeding 10% in the ipsilateral hemisphere during BTO is a strong predictor of failure in both BTO and SPECT. Our patient-specific COW blood flow models, incorporating detailed flow and arterial geometry data, offered valuable insights for predicting BTO outcomes. These models are especially beneficial for situations where conducting BTO or SPECT is clinically impractical.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"34 4","pages":"438-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.13198","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A patient-specific circle of Willis blood flow model in predicting outcomes of balloon test occlusion\",\"authors\":\"Jianmin Li,&nbsp;Daniel Li,&nbsp;Ali Alaraj,&nbsp;Xinjian Du,&nbsp;Kezhou Wang,&nbsp;Fady T. Charbel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.13198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Balloon test occlusion (BTO) evaluates cerebral ischemic tolerance before internal carotid artery (ICA) sacrifice but carries risks like dissection and thrombosis. This study introduces a new approach using a patient-specific circle of Willis (COW) blood flow model, based on non-invasive quantitative MR angiography (qMRA) measurements, to predict the outcomes of BTO.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We developed individualized COW blood flow models for 43 patients undergoing BTO. These models simulated blood flow and pressure under normal conditions and with the ICA occlusion. We then compared the model's predictions of blood flow changes due to the simulated ICA occlusion to actual qMRA measurements before the BTO.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>For all 31 BTO failures, the ipsilateral hemisphere showed an average flow decrease of 15 ± 10% (mean ± standard deviation), compared to 3 ± 2% in the contralateral hemisphere. In all 12 BTO passes, these figures were 6 ± 3% and 1 ± 0.8%, respectively. Notably, all BTO passes had less than a 10% reduction in the ipsilateral hemisphere. In contrast, 65% of BTO failures and 67% single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) failures exhibited a decrease of 10% or more in the same region.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Blood flow reduction exceeding 10% in the ipsilateral hemisphere during BTO is a strong predictor of failure in both BTO and SPECT. Our patient-specific COW blood flow models, incorporating detailed flow and arterial geometry data, offered valuable insights for predicting BTO outcomes. These models are especially beneficial for situations where conducting BTO or SPECT is clinically impractical.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"438-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.13198\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:球囊试验闭塞(BTO)可在牺牲颈内动脉(ICA)前评估脑缺血耐受性,但存在夹层和血栓形成等风险。本研究根据无创定量磁共振血管造影(qMRA)测量结果,采用患者特异性威利斯圈(COW)血流模型,提出了一种预测 BTO 结果的新方法:我们为 43 名接受 BTO 的患者建立了个性化的威利斯环血流模型。这些模型模拟了正常情况下和 ICA 闭塞时的血流和血压。然后,我们将模型对模拟 ICA 闭塞导致的血流变化的预测与 BTO 前的实际 qMRA 测量结果进行了比较:在所有 31 次 BTO 失败中,同侧半球的血流平均减少了 15 ± 10%(平均 ± 标准偏差),而对侧半球则减少了 3 ± 2%。在所有 12 次 BTO 通过中,这两个数字分别为 6 ± 3% 和 1 ± 0.8%。值得注意的是,同侧半球的所有 BTO 通过率均下降不到 10%。相比之下,65% 的 BTO 失败者和 67% 的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)失败者在同一区域的血流量减少了 10%或更多:结论:在 BTO 过程中,同侧半球血流减少超过 10% 是 BTO 和 SPECT 失败的有力预测因素。我们的患者特异性 COW 血流模型结合了详细的血流和动脉几何数据,为预测 BTO 结果提供了有价值的见解。这些模型尤其适用于临床上无法进行 BTO 或 SPECT 的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A patient-specific circle of Willis blood flow model in predicting outcomes of balloon test occlusion

Background and Purpose

Balloon test occlusion (BTO) evaluates cerebral ischemic tolerance before internal carotid artery (ICA) sacrifice but carries risks like dissection and thrombosis. This study introduces a new approach using a patient-specific circle of Willis (COW) blood flow model, based on non-invasive quantitative MR angiography (qMRA) measurements, to predict the outcomes of BTO.

Methods

We developed individualized COW blood flow models for 43 patients undergoing BTO. These models simulated blood flow and pressure under normal conditions and with the ICA occlusion. We then compared the model's predictions of blood flow changes due to the simulated ICA occlusion to actual qMRA measurements before the BTO.

Results

For all 31 BTO failures, the ipsilateral hemisphere showed an average flow decrease of 15 ± 10% (mean ± standard deviation), compared to 3 ± 2% in the contralateral hemisphere. In all 12 BTO passes, these figures were 6 ± 3% and 1 ± 0.8%, respectively. Notably, all BTO passes had less than a 10% reduction in the ipsilateral hemisphere. In contrast, 65% of BTO failures and 67% single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) failures exhibited a decrease of 10% or more in the same region.

Conclusion

Blood flow reduction exceeding 10% in the ipsilateral hemisphere during BTO is a strong predictor of failure in both BTO and SPECT. Our patient-specific COW blood flow models, incorporating detailed flow and arterial geometry data, offered valuable insights for predicting BTO outcomes. These models are especially beneficial for situations where conducting BTO or SPECT is clinically impractical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroimaging
Journal of Neuroimaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on: MRI CT Carotid Ultrasound and TCD SPECT PET Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology Functional MRI Xenon CT and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!
期刊最新文献
Predicting glioblastoma progression using MR diffusion tensor imaging: A systematic review Nerve cross-sectional area in vincristine-induced polyneuropathy: A nerve ultrasound pilot study Comparison of antithrombogenic coated and uncoated flow diverters in ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms Functional MRI and cognition in multiple sclerosis—Where are we now? Time-dependent MR diffusion analysis of functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas/pituitary neuroendocrine tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1