业务流程管理的挑战、局限性和未来发展方向--系统文献综述

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Process Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1108/bpmj-06-2023-0419
Marek Szelągowski, Justyna Berniak-Woźny
{"title":"业务流程管理的挑战、局限性和未来发展方向--系统文献综述","authors":"Marek Szelągowski, Justyna Berniak-Woźny","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-06-2023-0419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The aim of this paper is to identify the main challenges and limitations of current business process management (BPM) development directions noticed by researchers, as well as to define the areas of the main BPM paradigm shifts necessary for the BPM of tomorrow to meet the challenges posed by Industry 4.0 and the emerging Industry 5.0. This is extremely important from the perspective of eliminating the existing broadening gap between the considerations of academic researchers and the needs of business itself.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A systematic literature review was conducted on the basis of the resources of two digital databases: Web of Science (WoS) and SCOPUS. Based on the PRISMA protocol, the authors selected 29 papers published in the last decade that diagnosed the challenges and limitations of modern BPM and contained recommendations for its future development. The content of the articles was analyzed within four BPM core areas.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors of the selected articles most commonly point to the areas of organization (21 articles) and methods and information technology (IT) (22 articles) in the context of the challenges and limitations of current BPM and the directions of recommended future BPM development. This points to the prevalence among researchers of the perspective of Industry 4.0 – or focus on technological solutions and raising process efficiency, with the full exclusion or only the partial signalization of the influence of implementing new technologies on the stakeholders and in particular – employees, their roles and competencies – the key aspects of Industry 5.0.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The proposal of BPM future development directions requires the extension of the BPM paradigm, taking into account its holistic nature, especially unpredictable, knowledge-intensive business processes requiring dynamic management, the need to integrate BPM with knowledge management (KM) and the requirements of Industry 5.0 in terms of organizational culture. The limitation is that the study is based on only two databases: WoS and SCOPUS and that the search has been narrowed down to publications in English only.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The proposal of BPM future development directions also requires the extension of the BPM paradigm, taking into account the specific challenges and limitations that managers encounter on a daily basis. The presented summaries of the challenges and limitations resulting from the literature review are accompanied by recommendations that are primarily dedicated to practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The article indicates the area people and culture as one of the four core areas of BPM. It emphasizes the necessity to account to a greater degree for the influence of people, their knowledge, experience and engagement, as well as formal and informal communication, without which it is impossible to use the creativity, innovativeness and dynamism of the individual and the communities to create value in the course of business process execution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review of the literature on the limitations of modern BPM and its future in the context of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BPM challenges, limitations and future development directions – a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Marek Szelągowski, Justyna Berniak-Woźny\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bpmj-06-2023-0419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The aim of this paper is to identify the main challenges and limitations of current business process management (BPM) development directions noticed by researchers, as well as to define the areas of the main BPM paradigm shifts necessary for the BPM of tomorrow to meet the challenges posed by Industry 4.0 and the emerging Industry 5.0. This is extremely important from the perspective of eliminating the existing broadening gap between the considerations of academic researchers and the needs of business itself.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A systematic literature review was conducted on the basis of the resources of two digital databases: Web of Science (WoS) and SCOPUS. Based on the PRISMA protocol, the authors selected 29 papers published in the last decade that diagnosed the challenges and limitations of modern BPM and contained recommendations for its future development. The content of the articles was analyzed within four BPM core areas.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The authors of the selected articles most commonly point to the areas of organization (21 articles) and methods and information technology (IT) (22 articles) in the context of the challenges and limitations of current BPM and the directions of recommended future BPM development. This points to the prevalence among researchers of the perspective of Industry 4.0 – or focus on technological solutions and raising process efficiency, with the full exclusion or only the partial signalization of the influence of implementing new technologies on the stakeholders and in particular – employees, their roles and competencies – the key aspects of Industry 5.0.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The proposal of BPM future development directions requires the extension of the BPM paradigm, taking into account its holistic nature, especially unpredictable, knowledge-intensive business processes requiring dynamic management, the need to integrate BPM with knowledge management (KM) and the requirements of Industry 5.0 in terms of organizational culture. The limitation is that the study is based on only two databases: WoS and SCOPUS and that the search has been narrowed down to publications in English only.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The proposal of BPM future development directions also requires the extension of the BPM paradigm, taking into account the specific challenges and limitations that managers encounter on a daily basis. The presented summaries of the challenges and limitations resulting from the literature review are accompanied by recommendations that are primarily dedicated to practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>The article indicates the area people and culture as one of the four core areas of BPM. It emphasizes the necessity to account to a greater degree for the influence of people, their knowledge, experience and engagement, as well as formal and informal communication, without which it is impossible to use the creativity, innovativeness and dynamism of the individual and the communities to create value in the course of business process execution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review of the literature on the limitations of modern BPM and its future in the context of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-06-2023-0419\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-06-2023-0419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在明确研究人员注意到的当前业务流程管理(BPM)发展方向的主要挑战和局限性,并界定未来 BPM 所需的主要 BPM 范式转变领域,以应对工业 4.0 和新兴工业 5.0 带来的挑战。从消除学术研究人员的考虑与企业自身需求之间现有的日益扩大的差距的角度来看,这一点极为重要:科学网(WoS)和 SCOPUS。根据 PRISMA 协议,作者选择了过去十年中发表的 29 篇论文,这些论文分析了现代业务流程管理所面临的挑战和局限性,并对其未来发展提出了建议。研究结果所选文章的作者在谈到当前 BPM 所面临的挑战和局限性以及未来 BPM 发展的建议方向时,最常提到的领域是组织(21 篇)以及方法和信息技术(IT)(22 篇)。这表明,研究人员普遍从工业 4.0 的角度出发,或侧重于技术解决方案和提高流程效率,而完全忽视或仅部分强调了实施新技术对利益相关者的影响,特别是对员工及其角色和能力的影响,而这正是工业 5.0 的关键方面。研究的局限性/影响对业务流程管理未来发展方向的建议要求扩展业务流程管理范式,同时考虑到其整体性,特别是不可预测的、知识密集型的业务流程需要动态管理,将业务流程管理与知识管理(KM)相结合的必要性,以及工业 5.0 在组织文化方面的要求。这项研究的局限性在于,它只基于两个数据库:WoS 和 SCOPUS:实际意义提出业务流程管理的未来发展方向还需要扩展业务流程管理范式,同时考虑到管理人员日常遇到的具体挑战和限制。本文对文献综述中提出的挑战和局限性进行了总结,并提出了主要针对实践者的建议。社会影响本文指出,人与文化是业务流程管理的四个核心领域之一。文章强调,有必要在更大程度上考虑人的影响、人的知识、经验和参与度,以及正式和非正式的沟通,否则就不可能在业务流程执行过程中利用个人和群体的创造力、创新力和活力来创造价值。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一篇系统回顾现代业务流程管理的局限性及其在工业 4.0 和工业 5.0 背景下的未来的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BPM challenges, limitations and future development directions – a systematic literature review

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to identify the main challenges and limitations of current business process management (BPM) development directions noticed by researchers, as well as to define the areas of the main BPM paradigm shifts necessary for the BPM of tomorrow to meet the challenges posed by Industry 4.0 and the emerging Industry 5.0. This is extremely important from the perspective of eliminating the existing broadening gap between the considerations of academic researchers and the needs of business itself.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic literature review was conducted on the basis of the resources of two digital databases: Web of Science (WoS) and SCOPUS. Based on the PRISMA protocol, the authors selected 29 papers published in the last decade that diagnosed the challenges and limitations of modern BPM and contained recommendations for its future development. The content of the articles was analyzed within four BPM core areas.

Findings

The authors of the selected articles most commonly point to the areas of organization (21 articles) and methods and information technology (IT) (22 articles) in the context of the challenges and limitations of current BPM and the directions of recommended future BPM development. This points to the prevalence among researchers of the perspective of Industry 4.0 – or focus on technological solutions and raising process efficiency, with the full exclusion or only the partial signalization of the influence of implementing new technologies on the stakeholders and in particular – employees, their roles and competencies – the key aspects of Industry 5.0.

Research limitations/implications

The proposal of BPM future development directions requires the extension of the BPM paradigm, taking into account its holistic nature, especially unpredictable, knowledge-intensive business processes requiring dynamic management, the need to integrate BPM with knowledge management (KM) and the requirements of Industry 5.0 in terms of organizational culture. The limitation is that the study is based on only two databases: WoS and SCOPUS and that the search has been narrowed down to publications in English only.

Practical implications

The proposal of BPM future development directions also requires the extension of the BPM paradigm, taking into account the specific challenges and limitations that managers encounter on a daily basis. The presented summaries of the challenges and limitations resulting from the literature review are accompanied by recommendations that are primarily dedicated to practitioners.

Social implications

The article indicates the area people and culture as one of the four core areas of BPM. It emphasizes the necessity to account to a greater degree for the influence of people, their knowledge, experience and engagement, as well as formal and informal communication, without which it is impossible to use the creativity, innovativeness and dynamism of the individual and the communities to create value in the course of business process execution.

Originality/value

To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review of the literature on the limitations of modern BPM and its future in the context of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
期刊最新文献
Research on the evaluation and enhancement strategies of manufacturing clustered supply chain synergies Big data analytics adoption success: value chain process-level perspective A holistic empirical approach to marketing activities and performance interaction in banking industry: the mediating role of customer-based brand equity Managing supply chain disruptions in pharmaceutical distribution: the roles of disruption orientation and mitigation strategies SME supply chain resilience in disruptive times: the effects of supply chain robustness, access to government assistance and disruption intensity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1