无刺蜂蜂蜜对临床和食源性病原体的抗菌活性:系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 7.4 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food frontiers Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1002/fft2.386
Fausto Cabezas-Mera, Ariana C. Cedeño-Pinargote, Eduardo Tejera, José M. Álvarez-Suarez, António Machado
{"title":"无刺蜂蜂蜜对临床和食源性病原体的抗菌活性:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Fausto Cabezas-Mera,&nbsp;Ariana C. Cedeño-Pinargote,&nbsp;Eduardo Tejera,&nbsp;José M. Álvarez-Suarez,&nbsp;António Machado","doi":"10.1002/fft2.386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Honey produced by stingless bees (Tribe: <i>Meliponini</i>) is well-known for their medicinal and antimicrobial properties from their diverse content of bioactive compounds. However, it has not been possible to fully characterize its active principles. The present systematic review is based on 117 full-text articles. Our review highlights (1) the need to apply complementary methodologies and consolidate protocols to quantify antimicrobial activity (2) to characterize antimicrobial agents in honeys of <i>Heterotrigona itama</i>, <i>Tetragonisca angustula</i>, and <i>Melipona beecheii</i>, and; (3) to search for compounds against multidrug-resistant and/or biofilm-forming pathogens. Moreover, we performed a meta-analysis of 29 articles with quantitative data using diffusion assays and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> were the most evaluated pathogens, evidencing 221 and 149 antimicrobial activity assays against honey samples of 36 and 24 stingless bee species, respectively. The highest pooled mean in diffusion assays against <i>S. aureus</i> showed a difference between methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA) and non-MRSA strains {14.43 [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.16–16.71] mm vs. 11.55 (95% CI: 10.22–12.87) mm}, whereas <i>E. coli</i> showed pooled means of 9.09 (95% CI: 7.93–10.25) mm. Regarding MIC expressed as volume/volume percentage (%, v/v), the estimated inhibitory concentrations were 7.89 (95% CI: 3.94–11.83) mL/100 mL for MRSA and 5.60 (95% CI: 2.66–8.55) mL/100 mL considering all <i>S. aureus</i> strains. In contrast, the estimated MICs as weight/volume percentage (%, w/v) showed 15.00 [(95% CI: 12.84–17.16) g/100 mL for <i>S. aureus</i> and 16.17 (95% CI: 5.78–26.55) g/100 mL for <i>E. coli</i>. However, honey remains an unexplored source of antimicrobial molecules.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.386","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial activity of stingless bee honey (Tribe: Meliponini) on clinical and foodborne pathogens: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Fausto Cabezas-Mera,&nbsp;Ariana C. Cedeño-Pinargote,&nbsp;Eduardo Tejera,&nbsp;José M. Álvarez-Suarez,&nbsp;António Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fft2.386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Honey produced by stingless bees (Tribe: <i>Meliponini</i>) is well-known for their medicinal and antimicrobial properties from their diverse content of bioactive compounds. However, it has not been possible to fully characterize its active principles. The present systematic review is based on 117 full-text articles. Our review highlights (1) the need to apply complementary methodologies and consolidate protocols to quantify antimicrobial activity (2) to characterize antimicrobial agents in honeys of <i>Heterotrigona itama</i>, <i>Tetragonisca angustula</i>, and <i>Melipona beecheii</i>, and; (3) to search for compounds against multidrug-resistant and/or biofilm-forming pathogens. Moreover, we performed a meta-analysis of 29 articles with quantitative data using diffusion assays and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> were the most evaluated pathogens, evidencing 221 and 149 antimicrobial activity assays against honey samples of 36 and 24 stingless bee species, respectively. The highest pooled mean in diffusion assays against <i>S. aureus</i> showed a difference between methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA) and non-MRSA strains {14.43 [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.16–16.71] mm vs. 11.55 (95% CI: 10.22–12.87) mm}, whereas <i>E. coli</i> showed pooled means of 9.09 (95% CI: 7.93–10.25) mm. Regarding MIC expressed as volume/volume percentage (%, v/v), the estimated inhibitory concentrations were 7.89 (95% CI: 3.94–11.83) mL/100 mL for MRSA and 5.60 (95% CI: 2.66–8.55) mL/100 mL considering all <i>S. aureus</i> strains. In contrast, the estimated MICs as weight/volume percentage (%, w/v) showed 15.00 [(95% CI: 12.84–17.16) g/100 mL for <i>S. aureus</i> and 16.17 (95% CI: 5.78–26.55) g/100 mL for <i>E. coli</i>. However, honey remains an unexplored source of antimicrobial molecules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food frontiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.386\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无刺蜜蜂(蜜蜂科:Meliponini)酿造的蜂蜜因其含有多种生物活性化合物而具有药用和抗菌特性而闻名于世。然而,目前还无法完全确定其活性成分的特征。本系统综述基于 117 篇全文文章。我们的综述强调了以下几点:(1)需要应用互补方法和整合规程来量化抗菌活性;(2)确定 Heterotrigona itama、Tetragonisca angustula 和 Melipona beecheii 蜂蜜中抗菌剂的特性;(3)寻找针对耐多药和/或形成生物膜的病原体的化合物。此外,我们还对 29 篇文章进行了荟萃分析,这些文章利用扩散试验和最小抑菌浓度(MIC)提供了定量数据。金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌是被评估最多的病原体,它们分别对 36 种和 24 种无刺蜂的蜂蜜样本进行了 221 次和 149 次抗菌活性测定。金黄色葡萄球菌扩散试验的最高集合平均值显示,耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和非 MRSA 菌株之间存在差异{14.43[95% 置信区间(CI):12.16-16.71]毫米对 11.55(95% CI:10.22-12.87)毫米},而大肠杆菌的集合平均值为 9.09(95% CI:7.93-10.25)毫米。关于以体积/体积百分比(%,v/v)表示的 MIC,MRSA 的估计抑制浓度为 7.89(95% CI:3.94-11.83)毫升/100 毫升,所有金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的估计抑制浓度为 5.60(95% CI:2.66-8.55)毫升/100 毫升。相反,按重量/体积百分比(%,w/v)估算的 MICs 显示,金黄色葡萄球菌为 15.00 [(95% CI: 12.84-17.16) g/100 mL,大肠杆菌为 16.17 (95% CI: 5.78-26.55) g/100 mL。然而,蜂蜜仍然是一种尚未开发的抗菌分子来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial activity of stingless bee honey (Tribe: Meliponini) on clinical and foodborne pathogens: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Honey produced by stingless bees (Tribe: Meliponini) is well-known for their medicinal and antimicrobial properties from their diverse content of bioactive compounds. However, it has not been possible to fully characterize its active principles. The present systematic review is based on 117 full-text articles. Our review highlights (1) the need to apply complementary methodologies and consolidate protocols to quantify antimicrobial activity (2) to characterize antimicrobial agents in honeys of Heterotrigona itama, Tetragonisca angustula, and Melipona beecheii, and; (3) to search for compounds against multidrug-resistant and/or biofilm-forming pathogens. Moreover, we performed a meta-analysis of 29 articles with quantitative data using diffusion assays and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most evaluated pathogens, evidencing 221 and 149 antimicrobial activity assays against honey samples of 36 and 24 stingless bee species, respectively. The highest pooled mean in diffusion assays against S. aureus showed a difference between methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and non-MRSA strains {14.43 [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.16–16.71] mm vs. 11.55 (95% CI: 10.22–12.87) mm}, whereas E. coli showed pooled means of 9.09 (95% CI: 7.93–10.25) mm. Regarding MIC expressed as volume/volume percentage (%, v/v), the estimated inhibitory concentrations were 7.89 (95% CI: 3.94–11.83) mL/100 mL for MRSA and 5.60 (95% CI: 2.66–8.55) mL/100 mL considering all S. aureus strains. In contrast, the estimated MICs as weight/volume percentage (%, w/v) showed 15.00 [(95% CI: 12.84–17.16) g/100 mL for S. aureus and 16.17 (95% CI: 5.78–26.55) g/100 mL for E. coli. However, honey remains an unexplored source of antimicrobial molecules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The One Health approach in food safety: Challenges and opportunities The significance of cultural context in the classification of preferred mouth behavior: Exploring eating behavior using causal network analysis Identification of promising lactic acid bacteria for the fermentation of lupine- and faba bean-based substrates to produce refreshing protein-rich beverages—A strain screening Natural active products in fruit postharvest preservation: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1