胚胎植入前遗传学检测:关于胚胎组织活检的侵入性和胚胎发育风险的个人观点 "操作者调查"

F. Al-Rshoud, Lina Almahmoud, Nagham Younis, Rnad AL. Ajarmeh, Ahmad M. Fares
{"title":"胚胎植入前遗传学检测:关于胚胎组织活检的侵入性和胚胎发育风险的个人观点 \"操作者调查\"","authors":"F. Al-Rshoud, Lina Almahmoud, Nagham Younis, Rnad AL. Ajarmeh, Ahmad M. Fares","doi":"10.21926/obm.genet.2401222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to assess the Trophectoderm (TE) biopsy practice in Jordan in terms of the following effectiveness parameters: timing of zona breaching, risk of inner cell mass herniation if zona breaching was done on day 3, timing of TE sampling, method of biopsy (pulling or flicking), number of laser pulses, assessment of embryo survival after biopsy, and degeneration rate. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in November 2022. The collected data presented the perception of embryologists (>10 years experience) about the difficulty of the technique and the awareness of the risks it imposes on embryonic development. Potential predictors of embryologists’ awareness of the risks of trophectoderm biopsy in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and procedure difficulty were investigated. 125 embryologists were eligible, and 72 (57.6%) adequately filled the questionnaire, of which 51 (70.8%) perceived the procedure as moderately difficult. However, 8 (11.1%) embryologists perceive it as very difficult. Regarding the preferred time of zona breaching, 39 (54.2%) of embryologists perform zona breaching on day 5 of embryonic life. 68% claim they primarily use flicking when performing TE biopsy. Moreover, 33 (45.8%) of the 72 surveyed embryologists claimed they use 2-3 laser pulses, and 56 (77.8%) claimed it takes 2 to 3 minutes to finish the procedure. Regarding the embryologists’ awareness of the risk of Inner Cell Mass (ICM) herniation, most embryologists 46 (64%) believed there is a moderate risk if zona breaching is done on day 3. 23 (32%) acknowledge the procedure as having a low risk for embryonal development. 29 (40.3%) of embryologists assess survival by checking the re-expansion of the biopsied blastocyst after 2 hours, while 18% check blastocyst re-expansion after 15 minutes. 39 (54.2%) claimed that the incidence of degeneration rate post-TE biopsy is rare. TE biopsy strategy is one of the most promising biopsy techniques in PGT. Most embryologists in Jordan perceive the procedure as moderately difficult due to the technical considerations involved in performing the optimum TE biopsy.","PeriodicalId":503721,"journal":{"name":"OBM Genetics","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Personal Views Regarding the Invasiveness of Trophectoderm Biopsy and Risks on Embryos Development “An Operators Survey”\",\"authors\":\"F. Al-Rshoud, Lina Almahmoud, Nagham Younis, Rnad AL. Ajarmeh, Ahmad M. Fares\",\"doi\":\"10.21926/obm.genet.2401222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to assess the Trophectoderm (TE) biopsy practice in Jordan in terms of the following effectiveness parameters: timing of zona breaching, risk of inner cell mass herniation if zona breaching was done on day 3, timing of TE sampling, method of biopsy (pulling or flicking), number of laser pulses, assessment of embryo survival after biopsy, and degeneration rate. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in November 2022. The collected data presented the perception of embryologists (>10 years experience) about the difficulty of the technique and the awareness of the risks it imposes on embryonic development. Potential predictors of embryologists’ awareness of the risks of trophectoderm biopsy in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and procedure difficulty were investigated. 125 embryologists were eligible, and 72 (57.6%) adequately filled the questionnaire, of which 51 (70.8%) perceived the procedure as moderately difficult. However, 8 (11.1%) embryologists perceive it as very difficult. Regarding the preferred time of zona breaching, 39 (54.2%) of embryologists perform zona breaching on day 5 of embryonic life. 68% claim they primarily use flicking when performing TE biopsy. Moreover, 33 (45.8%) of the 72 surveyed embryologists claimed they use 2-3 laser pulses, and 56 (77.8%) claimed it takes 2 to 3 minutes to finish the procedure. Regarding the embryologists’ awareness of the risk of Inner Cell Mass (ICM) herniation, most embryologists 46 (64%) believed there is a moderate risk if zona breaching is done on day 3. 23 (32%) acknowledge the procedure as having a low risk for embryonal development. 29 (40.3%) of embryologists assess survival by checking the re-expansion of the biopsied blastocyst after 2 hours, while 18% check blastocyst re-expansion after 15 minutes. 39 (54.2%) claimed that the incidence of degeneration rate post-TE biopsy is rare. TE biopsy strategy is one of the most promising biopsy techniques in PGT. Most embryologists in Jordan perceive the procedure as moderately difficult due to the technical considerations involved in performing the optimum TE biopsy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OBM Genetics\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OBM Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.genet.2401222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.genet.2401222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在从以下有效性参数评估约旦的胚胎干细胞(Trophectoderm,TE)活检实践:突破透明带的时间、如果在第 3 天突破透明带则内细胞团疝出的风险、TE 取样时间、活检方法(拉取或弹取)、激光脉冲数、活检后胚胎存活率评估以及退化率。2022 年 11 月进行了一次在线横断面调查。收集到的数据显示了胚胎学家(工作经验超过 10 年)对该技术难度的看法,以及对该技术给胚胎发育带来的风险的认识。调查了胚胎学家对胚胎植入前遗传学检测(PGT)中滋养层外胚层活检的风险意识和手术难度的潜在预测因素。125名胚胎学家符合条件,72名(57.6%)充分填写了问卷,其中51名(70.8%)认为手术难度适中。然而,有 8 位(11.1%)胚胎学家认为该过程非常困难。关于突破透明带的首选时间,39 位(54.2%)胚胎学家在胚胎生命的第 5 天进行突破透明带手术。68%的胚胎学家声称他们在进行 TE 活检时主要使用弹拨法。此外,在接受调查的 72 位胚胎学家中,33 位(45.8%)声称他们使用了 2-3 个激光脉冲,56 位(77.8%)声称需要 2 到 3 分钟才能完成手术。关于胚胎学家对内细胞团(ICM)疝风险的认识,大多数胚胎学家 46 人(64%)认为,如果在第 3 天进行透明带突破手术,会有中度风险。23(32%)人认为该手术对胚胎发育的风险较低。29(40.3%)名胚胎学家在 2 小时后通过检查活检囊胚的再次膨胀来评估存活率,18% 的胚胎学家在 15 分钟后检查囊胚的再次膨胀。39(54.2%)名胚胎学家称 TE 活检后退化率的发生率很低。TE 活检策略是 PGT 中最有前途的活检技术之一。约旦的大多数胚胎学家认为,由于在进行最佳 TE 活检时需要考虑各种技术因素,因此手术难度适中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Personal Views Regarding the Invasiveness of Trophectoderm Biopsy and Risks on Embryos Development “An Operators Survey”
This study aims to assess the Trophectoderm (TE) biopsy practice in Jordan in terms of the following effectiveness parameters: timing of zona breaching, risk of inner cell mass herniation if zona breaching was done on day 3, timing of TE sampling, method of biopsy (pulling or flicking), number of laser pulses, assessment of embryo survival after biopsy, and degeneration rate. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in November 2022. The collected data presented the perception of embryologists (>10 years experience) about the difficulty of the technique and the awareness of the risks it imposes on embryonic development. Potential predictors of embryologists’ awareness of the risks of trophectoderm biopsy in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and procedure difficulty were investigated. 125 embryologists were eligible, and 72 (57.6%) adequately filled the questionnaire, of which 51 (70.8%) perceived the procedure as moderately difficult. However, 8 (11.1%) embryologists perceive it as very difficult. Regarding the preferred time of zona breaching, 39 (54.2%) of embryologists perform zona breaching on day 5 of embryonic life. 68% claim they primarily use flicking when performing TE biopsy. Moreover, 33 (45.8%) of the 72 surveyed embryologists claimed they use 2-3 laser pulses, and 56 (77.8%) claimed it takes 2 to 3 minutes to finish the procedure. Regarding the embryologists’ awareness of the risk of Inner Cell Mass (ICM) herniation, most embryologists 46 (64%) believed there is a moderate risk if zona breaching is done on day 3. 23 (32%) acknowledge the procedure as having a low risk for embryonal development. 29 (40.3%) of embryologists assess survival by checking the re-expansion of the biopsied blastocyst after 2 hours, while 18% check blastocyst re-expansion after 15 minutes. 39 (54.2%) claimed that the incidence of degeneration rate post-TE biopsy is rare. TE biopsy strategy is one of the most promising biopsy techniques in PGT. Most embryologists in Jordan perceive the procedure as moderately difficult due to the technical considerations involved in performing the optimum TE biopsy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy for Pediatric and Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Potential Use of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hMSCs) in Pancreatic Damage/Cancer Integrated Web Application (Snips2HLA-HsG) Development for Sample Preparation and Model Creation for HLA Allele Prediction with the SNP Data Using HIBAG Package of Bioconductor and R Programming Melatonin As a Protective Agent Against Environmental Stresses: A Review into Its Molecular Regulation in Plants The Screening Strategies Used to Establish Egyptian Women Entrepreneurs’ Attitudes towards Genetic Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1