拔牙根面分离出的链球菌对青霉素 V 和克林霉素的抗生素耐药性(使用 E 测试法

Mohammad-Hassan Akhavan Karbassi, Faraz Kheirollahi, Hengameh Zandi, Mohammadhossein Falahzadeh, Alireza Reza Navab Azam
{"title":"拔牙根面分离出的链球菌对青霉素 V 和克林霉素的抗生素耐药性(使用 E 测试法","authors":"Mohammad-Hassan Akhavan Karbassi, Faraz Kheirollahi, Hengameh Zandi, Mohammadhossein Falahzadeh, Alireza Reza Navab Azam","doi":"10.5812/semj-141304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antibiotics are used to treat and prevent oral infections. Clindamycin and penicillin are widely used drugs in this field. Poor use of antibacterial agents causes the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Objectives: The present study examined and compared the frequency distribution of resistance of streptococci isolated from the root surface of extracted teeth to penicillin V and clindamycin. This study was conducted in 2021 in Yazd, Iran. Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study performed in vitro. The samples were taken from the root surfaces of 50 teeth immediately after extraction and transferred to the laboratory in a transfer medium. After cultivation, isolation, and identification, the antibiotic resistance of isolates was measured by the E-test method. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 23). Results: Streptococci spp. were isolated from 46 samples (92%) without environmental contamination. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 50 and MIC 90 for penicillin V were 0.5 μg/mL and 1 μg/mL, respectively, and for clindamycin, 0.125 μg/mL and 0.19 μg/mL, respectively, which was significantly (P = 0.0001) lower for clindamycin. Intermediate sensitivity to penicillin V was 95.6%, and resistance to clindamycin was 21.8%. Conclusions: It seems that except in limited cases where there is resistance to clindamycin, this antibiotic is a more effective drug to control the bacteria in the mouth. However, in some cases, aerobic isolates showed intermediate sensitivity to penicillin V; however, resistance to clindamycin was observed.","PeriodicalId":507014,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E-Medical Journal","volume":"100 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic Resistance of Streptococcus spp. Isolated from the Root Surface of Extracted Teeth to Penicillin V and Clindamycin Using an E-Test\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad-Hassan Akhavan Karbassi, Faraz Kheirollahi, Hengameh Zandi, Mohammadhossein Falahzadeh, Alireza Reza Navab Azam\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/semj-141304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Antibiotics are used to treat and prevent oral infections. Clindamycin and penicillin are widely used drugs in this field. Poor use of antibacterial agents causes the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Objectives: The present study examined and compared the frequency distribution of resistance of streptococci isolated from the root surface of extracted teeth to penicillin V and clindamycin. This study was conducted in 2021 in Yazd, Iran. Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study performed in vitro. The samples were taken from the root surfaces of 50 teeth immediately after extraction and transferred to the laboratory in a transfer medium. After cultivation, isolation, and identification, the antibiotic resistance of isolates was measured by the E-test method. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 23). Results: Streptococci spp. were isolated from 46 samples (92%) without environmental contamination. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 50 and MIC 90 for penicillin V were 0.5 μg/mL and 1 μg/mL, respectively, and for clindamycin, 0.125 μg/mL and 0.19 μg/mL, respectively, which was significantly (P = 0.0001) lower for clindamycin. Intermediate sensitivity to penicillin V was 95.6%, and resistance to clindamycin was 21.8%. Conclusions: It seems that except in limited cases where there is resistance to clindamycin, this antibiotic is a more effective drug to control the bacteria in the mouth. However, in some cases, aerobic isolates showed intermediate sensitivity to penicillin V; however, resistance to clindamycin was observed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shiraz E-Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"100 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shiraz E-Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-141304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E-Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-141304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗生素用于治疗和预防口腔感染。克林霉素和青霉素是这一领域广泛使用的药物。抗菌药使用不当会导致抗生素耐药菌的出现。研究目的本研究考察并比较了从拔牙的牙根表面分离出的链球菌对青霉素 V 和克林霉素的耐药性频率分布。本研究于 2021 年在伊朗亚兹德进行。研究方法这是一项在体外进行的横断面分析研究。样本取自拔牙后的 50 颗牙齿的根部表面,并在转移培养基中转移到实验室。经过培养、分离和鉴定后,用 E 测试法测量分离物的抗生素耐药性。数据使用 SPSS 软件(23 版)进行分析。结果从 46 份样本(92%)中分离出链球菌,未受环境污染。青霉素 V 的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC) 50 和 MIC 90 分别为 0.5 μg/mL 和 1 μg/mL,克林霉素的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC) 50 和 MIC 90 分别为 0.125 μg/mL 和 0.19 μg/mL,克林霉素的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC) 50 和 MIC 90 明显较低(P = 0.0001)。对青霉素 V 的中间敏感性为 95.6%,对克林霉素的耐药性为 21.8%。结论:看来,除了对克林霉素产生耐药性的少数病例外,克林霉素是控制口腔细菌的更有效药物。不过,在某些病例中,需氧菌分离物对青霉素 V 呈中度敏感性,但对克林霉素产生了耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic Resistance of Streptococcus spp. Isolated from the Root Surface of Extracted Teeth to Penicillin V and Clindamycin Using an E-Test
Background: Antibiotics are used to treat and prevent oral infections. Clindamycin and penicillin are widely used drugs in this field. Poor use of antibacterial agents causes the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Objectives: The present study examined and compared the frequency distribution of resistance of streptococci isolated from the root surface of extracted teeth to penicillin V and clindamycin. This study was conducted in 2021 in Yazd, Iran. Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study performed in vitro. The samples were taken from the root surfaces of 50 teeth immediately after extraction and transferred to the laboratory in a transfer medium. After cultivation, isolation, and identification, the antibiotic resistance of isolates was measured by the E-test method. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 23). Results: Streptococci spp. were isolated from 46 samples (92%) without environmental contamination. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 50 and MIC 90 for penicillin V were 0.5 μg/mL and 1 μg/mL, respectively, and for clindamycin, 0.125 μg/mL and 0.19 μg/mL, respectively, which was significantly (P = 0.0001) lower for clindamycin. Intermediate sensitivity to penicillin V was 95.6%, and resistance to clindamycin was 21.8%. Conclusions: It seems that except in limited cases where there is resistance to clindamycin, this antibiotic is a more effective drug to control the bacteria in the mouth. However, in some cases, aerobic isolates showed intermediate sensitivity to penicillin V; however, resistance to clindamycin was observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Iranian Family Physicians’ Knowledge Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening, Risk Factors, and Sings and Symptoms Persian Mobile Apps for Diabetic Patients: App Review and Evaluation Study The Correlation Between Lighting Intensity, Eye Fatigue, Occupational Stress, and Sleep Quality in the Control Room Operators of Abadan Refinery Restricting Driving Privileges of Individuals with Mental Health Problems: A Legal Gap in Iran Artificial Intelligence in Diabetes Management: Revolutionizing the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus; a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1