挪威动物源食品的情感形象模式:陆地与海洋

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105168
Nienke Böhm , Rouven Doran , Gisela Böhm , Charles A. Ogunbode
{"title":"挪威动物源食品的情感形象模式:陆地与海洋","authors":"Nienke Böhm ,&nbsp;Rouven Doran ,&nbsp;Gisela Böhm ,&nbsp;Charles A. Ogunbode","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To get an understanding of drivers of animal-sourced protein consumption, we explored laypeople’s affective images of animal-sourced food. A national representative sample of the Norwegian population (<em>N =</em> 783) provided free associations to six food products originating either from livestock, capture fishery, aquaculture, or hunting. Subsequently, participants evaluated their own free associations as either positive, negative, or neutral. We found that people show different associative patterns for animal-sourced food from land than from sea. Livestock and hunting are mostly related to traditions and food, whereas capture fishery relates to production, consequences, and evaluations. People reported to have little knowledge about food products in the aquaculture category. Livestock was the most positively evaluated category, followed by hunting and capture fishery; aquaculture elicited the most negative associations. The current findings suggest a need to consider different strategies to encourage consumption of specific categories of food products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000703/pdfft?md5=537ba637f4a43353a5b1694fc5e19c76&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000703-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of affective images of animal-sourced food in Norway: Land versus sea\",\"authors\":\"Nienke Böhm ,&nbsp;Rouven Doran ,&nbsp;Gisela Böhm ,&nbsp;Charles A. Ogunbode\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To get an understanding of drivers of animal-sourced protein consumption, we explored laypeople’s affective images of animal-sourced food. A national representative sample of the Norwegian population (<em>N =</em> 783) provided free associations to six food products originating either from livestock, capture fishery, aquaculture, or hunting. Subsequently, participants evaluated their own free associations as either positive, negative, or neutral. We found that people show different associative patterns for animal-sourced food from land than from sea. Livestock and hunting are mostly related to traditions and food, whereas capture fishery relates to production, consequences, and evaluations. People reported to have little knowledge about food products in the aquaculture category. Livestock was the most positively evaluated category, followed by hunting and capture fishery; aquaculture elicited the most negative associations. The current findings suggest a need to consider different strategies to encourage consumption of specific categories of food products.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000703/pdfft?md5=537ba637f4a43353a5b1694fc5e19c76&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000703-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000703\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了了解动物源性蛋白质消费的驱动因素,我们探讨了普通人对动物源性食品的情感形象。一个具有全国代表性的挪威人口样本(N = 783)提供了六种食品的自由联想,这六种食品分别来自畜牧业、捕捞渔业、水产养殖业或狩猎业。随后,参与者将自己的自由联想评价为积极、消极或中性。我们发现,人们对来自陆地和海洋的动物食品表现出不同的联想模式。牲畜和狩猎主要与传统和食物有关,而捕捞渔业则与生产、后果和评价有关。人们对水产养殖类食品知之甚少。牲畜是评价最积极的类别,其次是狩猎和捕捞渔业;水产养殖引起了最消极的联想。目前的研究结果表明,有必要考虑采取不同的策略来鼓励人们消费特定类别的食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of affective images of animal-sourced food in Norway: Land versus sea

To get an understanding of drivers of animal-sourced protein consumption, we explored laypeople’s affective images of animal-sourced food. A national representative sample of the Norwegian population (N = 783) provided free associations to six food products originating either from livestock, capture fishery, aquaculture, or hunting. Subsequently, participants evaluated their own free associations as either positive, negative, or neutral. We found that people show different associative patterns for animal-sourced food from land than from sea. Livestock and hunting are mostly related to traditions and food, whereas capture fishery relates to production, consequences, and evaluations. People reported to have little knowledge about food products in the aquaculture category. Livestock was the most positively evaluated category, followed by hunting and capture fishery; aquaculture elicited the most negative associations. The current findings suggest a need to consider different strategies to encourage consumption of specific categories of food products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Snack attack: What factors affect American snacking behavior? Themes and sentiments in conversations about food waste on Twitter: Proposal of a framework using neural topic modeling Health Star Rating Labels: A systematic review and future research agenda Momentum for organic food purchase intention and actual adoption- moderating effects of social media influencer and celebrity endorser Segmenting and profiling seaweed consumers: A cross-cultural comparison of Australia, the United Kingdom and Croatia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1