Chao Zhang , Juan Li , Ping-Li Wang , Hua-Yun Chen , Yu-Hang Zhao , Ning Wang , Zhi-Tao Zhang , Yan-Wei Dang , Hong-Quan Wang , Jun Wang , Chu-Hua Fu
{"title":"多模态图像融合辅助自发性脑内出血内窥镜清除术","authors":"Chao Zhang , Juan Li , Ping-Li Wang , Hua-Yun Chen , Yu-Hang Zhao , Ning Wang , Zhi-Tao Zhang , Yan-Wei Dang , Hong-Quan Wang , Jun Wang , Chu-Hua Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Although traditional craniotomy (TC) surgery has failed to show benefits for the functional outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, a minimally invasive hematoma removal plan to avoid white matter fiber damage may be a safer and more feasible surgical approach, which may improve the prognosis of ICH. We conducted a historical cohort study on the use of multimodal image fusion-assisted neuroendoscopic surgery (MINS) for the treatment of ICH, and compared its safety and effectiveness with traditional methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a historical cohort study involving 241 patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Divided into MINS group and TC group based on surgical methods. Multimodal images (CT skull, CT angiography, and white matter fiber of MRI diffusion-tensor imaging) were fused into 3 dimensional images for preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance of endoscopic hematoma removal in the MINS group. Clinical features, operative efficiency, perioperative complications, and prognoses between 2 groups were compared. Normally distributed data were analyzed using <em>t</em>-test of 2 independent samples, Non-normally distributed data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Meanwhile categorical data were analyzed via the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. All statistical tests were two-sided, and <em>p</em> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 patients with ICH were enrolled, who underwent TC surgery or MINS. Patients who underwent MINS had shorter operative time (<em>p</em> < 0.001), less blood loss (<em>p</em> < 0.001), better hematoma evacuation (<em>p</em> = 0.003), and a shorter stay in the intensive care unit (<em>p</em> = 0.002) than patients who underwent TC. Based on clinical characteristics and analysis of perioperative complications, there is no significant difference between the 2 surgical methods. Modified Rankin scale scores at 180 days were better in the MINS than in the TC group (<em>p</em> = 0.014).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with TC for the treatment of ICH, MINS is safer and more efficient in cleaning ICH, which improved the prognosis of the patients. In the future, a larger sample size clinical trial will be needed to evaluate its efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"27 6","pages":"Pages 340-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal image fusion-assisted endoscopic evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Chao Zhang , Juan Li , Ping-Li Wang , Hua-Yun Chen , Yu-Hang Zhao , Ning Wang , Zhi-Tao Zhang , Yan-Wei Dang , Hong-Quan Wang , Jun Wang , Chu-Hua Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Although traditional craniotomy (TC) surgery has failed to show benefits for the functional outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, a minimally invasive hematoma removal plan to avoid white matter fiber damage may be a safer and more feasible surgical approach, which may improve the prognosis of ICH. We conducted a historical cohort study on the use of multimodal image fusion-assisted neuroendoscopic surgery (MINS) for the treatment of ICH, and compared its safety and effectiveness with traditional methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a historical cohort study involving 241 patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Divided into MINS group and TC group based on surgical methods. Multimodal images (CT skull, CT angiography, and white matter fiber of MRI diffusion-tensor imaging) were fused into 3 dimensional images for preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance of endoscopic hematoma removal in the MINS group. Clinical features, operative efficiency, perioperative complications, and prognoses between 2 groups were compared. Normally distributed data were analyzed using <em>t</em>-test of 2 independent samples, Non-normally distributed data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Meanwhile categorical data were analyzed via the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. All statistical tests were two-sided, and <em>p</em> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 patients with ICH were enrolled, who underwent TC surgery or MINS. Patients who underwent MINS had shorter operative time (<em>p</em> < 0.001), less blood loss (<em>p</em> < 0.001), better hematoma evacuation (<em>p</em> = 0.003), and a shorter stay in the intensive care unit (<em>p</em> = 0.002) than patients who underwent TC. Based on clinical characteristics and analysis of perioperative complications, there is no significant difference between the 2 surgical methods. Modified Rankin scale scores at 180 days were better in the MINS than in the TC group (<em>p</em> = 0.014).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with TC for the treatment of ICH, MINS is safer and more efficient in cleaning ICH, which improved the prognosis of the patients. In the future, a larger sample size clinical trial will be needed to evaluate its efficacy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 340-347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000336\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的虽然传统的开颅手术(TC)未能显示出对脑内出血(ICH)功能预后的益处。然而,避免白质纤维损伤的微创血肿清除计划可能是一种更安全、更可行的手术方法,可改善 ICH 的预后。我们对使用多模态图像融合辅助神经内镜手术(MINS)治疗 ICH 进行了历史队列研究,并比较了其与传统方法的安全性和有效性。根据手术方法分为 MINS 组和 TC 组。将多模态图像(头颅 CT、CT 血管造影和核磁共振成像弥散张量成像的白质纤维)融合为三维图像,用于 MINS 组的术前规划和内镜血肿清除术的术中指导。比较两组患者的临床特征、手术效率、围手术期并发症和预后。正态分布数据采用 2 个独立样本的 t 检验,非正态分布数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。同时,分类数据通过卡方检验或费雪精确检验进行分析。所有统计检验均为双侧检验,以 p < 0.05 为差异有统计学意义。与接受 TC 手术的患者相比,接受 MINS 手术的患者手术时间更短(p < 0.001),失血量更少(p < 0.001),血肿清除率更高(p = 0.003),在重症监护室的住院时间更短(p = 0.002)。根据临床特征和围手术期并发症分析,两种手术方法没有显著差异。结论与 TC 治疗 ICH 相比,MINS 在清理 ICH 方面更安全、更有效,改善了患者的预后。今后,需要进行更大样本量的临床试验来评估其疗效。
Multimodal image fusion-assisted endoscopic evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Purpose
Although traditional craniotomy (TC) surgery has failed to show benefits for the functional outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, a minimally invasive hematoma removal plan to avoid white matter fiber damage may be a safer and more feasible surgical approach, which may improve the prognosis of ICH. We conducted a historical cohort study on the use of multimodal image fusion-assisted neuroendoscopic surgery (MINS) for the treatment of ICH, and compared its safety and effectiveness with traditional methods.
Methods
This is a historical cohort study involving 241 patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Divided into MINS group and TC group based on surgical methods. Multimodal images (CT skull, CT angiography, and white matter fiber of MRI diffusion-tensor imaging) were fused into 3 dimensional images for preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance of endoscopic hematoma removal in the MINS group. Clinical features, operative efficiency, perioperative complications, and prognoses between 2 groups were compared. Normally distributed data were analyzed using t-test of 2 independent samples, Non-normally distributed data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Meanwhile categorical data were analyzed via the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 42 patients with ICH were enrolled, who underwent TC surgery or MINS. Patients who underwent MINS had shorter operative time (p < 0.001), less blood loss (p < 0.001), better hematoma evacuation (p = 0.003), and a shorter stay in the intensive care unit (p = 0.002) than patients who underwent TC. Based on clinical characteristics and analysis of perioperative complications, there is no significant difference between the 2 surgical methods. Modified Rankin scale scores at 180 days were better in the MINS than in the TC group (p = 0.014).
Conclusions
Compared with TC for the treatment of ICH, MINS is safer and more efficient in cleaning ICH, which improved the prognosis of the patients. In the future, a larger sample size clinical trial will be needed to evaluate its efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.