电诊断与神经肌肉超声在诊断和评估腕管综合征严重程度方面的关联。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13168
Soun Sheen, Aabra Ahmed, Mattie E Raiford, Courtney M C Jones, Eric Morrison, Kurt Hauber, John Orsini, Warren C Hammert, David Speach
{"title":"电诊断与神经肌肉超声在诊断和评估腕管综合征严重程度方面的关联。","authors":"Soun Sheen, Aabra Ahmed, Mattie E Raiford, Courtney M C Jones, Eric Morrison, Kurt Hauber, John Orsini, Warren C Hammert, David Speach","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular ultrasound plays an increasing role in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There are limited data supporting the correlation between the electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound measurements in CTS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between different electrodiagnostic severities and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in CTS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An academic tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 18 years or older evaluated with upper limb electrodiagnostic studies and neuromuscular ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurement: </strong>Ultrasound measurements of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at the wrist and the calculated wrist-to-forearm ratio (WFR) were compared with the electrodiagnostic severity (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Mean analysis and analysis of variance test (α = 0.05) were performed to assess the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1359 limbs were identified. There was a statistically significant association between electrodiagnostic severity of CTS and median nerve CSA at the wrist (p < .001), as well as the WFR (p < .001). The mean median nerve CSA at the wrist and WFR were 7.01 ± 2.06 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 6.80-7.20) and 1.24 ± 0.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.24) in electrodiagnostically normal median nerves, 10.47 ± 2.82 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 10.25-10.75) and 2.06 ± 0.67 (95% CI: 2.04-2.16) in electrodiagnostically mild CTS, 12.95 ± 4.74 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 12.41-13.59) and 2.49 ± 1.04 (95% CI: 2.37, 2.63) in electrodiagnostically moderate CTS, and 14.69 ± 5.38 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 13.95-15.44) and 2.71 ± 1.02 (95% CI: 2.56-2.84) in electrodiagnostically severe CTS, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests a direct association between electrodiagnostic severity and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in patients with suspected CTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"1190-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between electrodiagnosis and neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of carpal tunnel syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Soun Sheen, Aabra Ahmed, Mattie E Raiford, Courtney M C Jones, Eric Morrison, Kurt Hauber, John Orsini, Warren C Hammert, David Speach\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular ultrasound plays an increasing role in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There are limited data supporting the correlation between the electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound measurements in CTS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between different electrodiagnostic severities and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in CTS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An academic tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 18 years or older evaluated with upper limb electrodiagnostic studies and neuromuscular ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurement: </strong>Ultrasound measurements of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at the wrist and the calculated wrist-to-forearm ratio (WFR) were compared with the electrodiagnostic severity (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Mean analysis and analysis of variance test (α = 0.05) were performed to assess the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1359 limbs were identified. There was a statistically significant association between electrodiagnostic severity of CTS and median nerve CSA at the wrist (p < .001), as well as the WFR (p < .001). The mean median nerve CSA at the wrist and WFR were 7.01 ± 2.06 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 6.80-7.20) and 1.24 ± 0.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.24) in electrodiagnostically normal median nerves, 10.47 ± 2.82 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 10.25-10.75) and 2.06 ± 0.67 (95% CI: 2.04-2.16) in electrodiagnostically mild CTS, 12.95 ± 4.74 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 12.41-13.59) and 2.49 ± 1.04 (95% CI: 2.37, 2.63) in electrodiagnostically moderate CTS, and 14.69 ± 5.38 mm<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 13.95-15.44) and 2.71 ± 1.02 (95% CI: 2.56-2.84) in electrodiagnostically severe CTS, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests a direct association between electrodiagnostic severity and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in patients with suspected CTS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1190-1194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经肌肉超声在诊断腕管综合征(CTS)中发挥着越来越重要的作用。支持 CTS 中电诊断研究与超声测量之间相关性的数据有限:评估不同电诊断严重程度与 CTS 正中神经超声测量值之间的关联:设计:一项回顾性队列研究:一家学术性三级医疗中心:主要结果测量:将腕部正中神经横截面积(CSA)的超声测量值和计算得出的腕臂比(WFR)与电诊断严重程度(正常、轻度、中度和重度)进行比较。采用均值分析和方差分析检验(α = 0.05)来评估两者之间的关联:结果:共发现 1359 个肢体。CTS 的电诊断严重程度与腕部正中神经 CSA 之间存在统计学意义上的显著关联(P 2(95% CI:6.80-7.20),电诊断正常的正中神经 CSA 为 1.24 ± 0.36(95% CI:1.16-1.24),电诊断正常的正中神经 CSA 为 10.47 ± 2.82 mm2(95% CI:10.25-10.75),电诊断正常的正中神经 CSA 为 2.06 ± 0.67(95% CI:2.结论:该研究表明,电诊断轻度 CTS 与电诊断中度 CTS 之间存在直接关联:本研究表明,在疑似 CTS 患者中,电诊断严重程度与正中神经超声测量值之间存在直接联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between electrodiagnosis and neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Background: Neuromuscular ultrasound plays an increasing role in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There are limited data supporting the correlation between the electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound measurements in CTS.

Objective: To assess the association between different electrodiagnostic severities and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in CTS.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Setting: An academic tertiary care center.

Patients: Patients 18 years or older evaluated with upper limb electrodiagnostic studies and neuromuscular ultrasound.

Main outcome measurement: Ultrasound measurements of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at the wrist and the calculated wrist-to-forearm ratio (WFR) were compared with the electrodiagnostic severity (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Mean analysis and analysis of variance test (α = 0.05) were performed to assess the association.

Results: A total of 1359 limbs were identified. There was a statistically significant association between electrodiagnostic severity of CTS and median nerve CSA at the wrist (p < .001), as well as the WFR (p < .001). The mean median nerve CSA at the wrist and WFR were 7.01 ± 2.06 mm2 (95% CI: 6.80-7.20) and 1.24 ± 0.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.24) in electrodiagnostically normal median nerves, 10.47 ± 2.82 mm2 (95% CI: 10.25-10.75) and 2.06 ± 0.67 (95% CI: 2.04-2.16) in electrodiagnostically mild CTS, 12.95 ± 4.74 mm2 (95% CI: 12.41-13.59) and 2.49 ± 1.04 (95% CI: 2.37, 2.63) in electrodiagnostically moderate CTS, and 14.69 ± 5.38 mm2 (95% CI: 13.95-15.44) and 2.71 ± 1.02 (95% CI: 2.56-2.84) in electrodiagnostically severe CTS, respectively.

Conclusion: This study suggests a direct association between electrodiagnostic severity and ultrasound measurements of the median nerve in patients with suspected CTS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle. Self-perceived preparedness for practice among graduating physical medicine & rehabilitation residents. Knee joint mechanics during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a partial or full thickness quadriceps tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury. Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1