针对精神病患者的正念干预:随机可行性研究

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Mindfulness Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1007/s12671-024-02326-5
{"title":"针对精神病患者的正念干预:随机可行性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s12671-024-02326-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <span> <h3>Objectives</h3> <p>There is a rapidly growing body of research into mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for People Experiencing Psychosis. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of a novel, 6-week 1:1 MBI, as well as the feasibility of the assessment and analysis of between-session practice and metacognitive beliefs as predictors of Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Method</h3> <p>A case series design was used. Eight participants were recruited, with seven completers. The primary outcome, QoL, was assessed up to four times per week, with additional outcomes taken weekly, pre-post, and pre-mid-post. Multilevel modelling was used to examine predictors.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Results</h3> <p>The methods and intervention were feasible. However, most participants preferred shorter, 30-min appointments with one mindfulness practice. Between-session practice varied significantly (0–220 min total), with three participants completing no between-session practice. Pre- to mid-intervention improvement in metacognitive beliefs was lost at post-intervention assessment. Non-significant trends of improvement were noted in most outcomes.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Conclusions</h3> <p>A full-scale trial is recommended to assess the intervention and predictors, with adjustment of intervention length and post-intervention assessment suggested. Future research should also further examine metacognitive processes and factors associated with between-session practice adherence for people experiencing psychosis accessing MBIs.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Preregistration</h3> <p>This study was not preregistered. However, detailed study and intervention protocols were created as part of the ethics application, which was followed throughout the study. These documents are available upon request.</p> </span>","PeriodicalId":18523,"journal":{"name":"Mindfulness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindfulness-Based Interventions for People Experiencing Psychosis: A Randomized Feasibility Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12671-024-02326-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <span> <h3>Objectives</h3> <p>There is a rapidly growing body of research into mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for People Experiencing Psychosis. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of a novel, 6-week 1:1 MBI, as well as the feasibility of the assessment and analysis of between-session practice and metacognitive beliefs as predictors of Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Method</h3> <p>A case series design was used. Eight participants were recruited, with seven completers. The primary outcome, QoL, was assessed up to four times per week, with additional outcomes taken weekly, pre-post, and pre-mid-post. Multilevel modelling was used to examine predictors.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Results</h3> <p>The methods and intervention were feasible. However, most participants preferred shorter, 30-min appointments with one mindfulness practice. Between-session practice varied significantly (0–220 min total), with three participants completing no between-session practice. Pre- to mid-intervention improvement in metacognitive beliefs was lost at post-intervention assessment. Non-significant trends of improvement were noted in most outcomes.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Conclusions</h3> <p>A full-scale trial is recommended to assess the intervention and predictors, with adjustment of intervention length and post-intervention assessment suggested. Future research should also further examine metacognitive processes and factors associated with between-session practice adherence for people experiencing psychosis accessing MBIs.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Preregistration</h3> <p>This study was not preregistered. However, detailed study and intervention protocols were created as part of the ethics application, which was followed throughout the study. These documents are available upon request.</p> </span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mindfulness\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mindfulness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02326-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mindfulness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02326-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的 针对精神病患者的正念干预(MBI)研究正在迅速发展。本研究旨在考察一种新颖的、为期 6 周的 1:1 MBI 的可行性,以及评估和分析作为生活质量(QoL)结果预测因素的疗程间练习和元认知信念的可行性。 方法 采用病例系列设计。共招募了 8 名参与者,其中 7 人完成了治疗。主要结果是生活质量,每周评估多达四次,每周、前后和前中后评估其他结果。采用多层次模型对预测因素进行了研究。 结果 该方法和干预措施是可行的。然而,大多数参与者更喜欢较短的 30 分钟预约,只进行一次正念练习。两次治疗之间的练习时间差异很大(总共 0-220 分钟),其中有三位参与者没有完成两次治疗之间的练习。干预前和干预中期元认知信念的改善在干预后的评估中消失了。大多数结果的改善趋势并不明显。 结论 建议进行全面试验,评估干预措施和预测因素,并建议调整干预时间和干预后评估。未来的研究还应该进一步研究元认知过程以及与接受MBIs的精神病患者在疗程间坚持练习相关的因素。 预先登记 本研究未进行预先登记。但是,作为伦理申请的一部分,我们制定了详细的研究和干预协议,并在整个研究过程中予以遵守。这些文件可应要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mindfulness-Based Interventions for People Experiencing Psychosis: A Randomized Feasibility Study

Abstract

Objectives

There is a rapidly growing body of research into mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for People Experiencing Psychosis. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of a novel, 6-week 1:1 MBI, as well as the feasibility of the assessment and analysis of between-session practice and metacognitive beliefs as predictors of Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes.

Method

A case series design was used. Eight participants were recruited, with seven completers. The primary outcome, QoL, was assessed up to four times per week, with additional outcomes taken weekly, pre-post, and pre-mid-post. Multilevel modelling was used to examine predictors.

Results

The methods and intervention were feasible. However, most participants preferred shorter, 30-min appointments with one mindfulness practice. Between-session practice varied significantly (0–220 min total), with three participants completing no between-session practice. Pre- to mid-intervention improvement in metacognitive beliefs was lost at post-intervention assessment. Non-significant trends of improvement were noted in most outcomes.

Conclusions

A full-scale trial is recommended to assess the intervention and predictors, with adjustment of intervention length and post-intervention assessment suggested. Future research should also further examine metacognitive processes and factors associated with between-session practice adherence for people experiencing psychosis accessing MBIs.

Preregistration

This study was not preregistered. However, detailed study and intervention protocols were created as part of the ethics application, which was followed throughout the study. These documents are available upon request.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mindfulness
Mindfulness Multiple-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
19.40%
发文量
224
期刊介绍: Mindfulness seeks to advance research, clinical practice, and theory on mindfulness. It is interested in manuscripts from diverse viewpoints, including psychology, psychiatry, medicine, neurobiology, psychoneuroendocrinology, cognitive, behavioral, cultural, philosophy, spirituality, and wisdom traditions. Mindfulness encourages research submissions on the reliability and validity of assessment of mindfulness; clinical uses of mindfulness in psychological distress, psychiatric disorders, and medical conditions; alleviation of personal and societal suffering; the nature and foundations of mindfulness; mechanisms of action; and the use of mindfulness across cultures. The Journal also seeks to promote the use of mindfulness by publishing scholarly papers on the training of clinicians, institutional staff, teachers, parents, and industry personnel in mindful provision of services. Examples of topics include: Mindfulness-based psycho-educational interventions for children with learning, emotional, and behavioral disorders Treating depression and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure Yoga and mindfulness Cognitive-behavioral mindfulness group therapy interventions Mindfulnessness and emotional regulation difficulties in children Loving-kindness meditation to increase social connectedness Training for parents and children with ADHD Recovery from substance abuse Changing parents’ mindfulness Child management skills Treating childhood anxiety and depression
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Facilitating Environment for Mindfulness Meditation: Establishing a Framework through Analysis of Means and Exploratory Factor Analysis A Systematic Review on the State of the Art of Culturally Adapted Mindfulness-Based Interventions for First Nations Peoples: Cultural Adaptation, Effectiveness, and Feasibility Mindfulness Training Has Long-Term Therapeutic Benefits in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Brain–Heart Interactions in Novice Meditation Practitioners During Breath Focus and an Arithmetic Task Temporal Dynamics and Long-Term Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Young Adults With Adverse Childhood Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1