在成年智障人士中验证德文版 DSQIID

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Research in Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104721
Daria Tarasova , Peggy Rösner , Shoumitro Deb , Tanja Sappok
{"title":"在成年智障人士中验证德文版 DSQIID","authors":"Daria Tarasova ,&nbsp;Peggy Rösner ,&nbsp;Shoumitro Deb ,&nbsp;Tanja Sappok","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An observer-rated screening questionnaire for dementia for people with intellectual disabilities (ID), DSQIID, was developed in the UK. So far, the German version has not yet been validated in adults with ID.</p></div><div><h3>Aims/Methods</h3><p>We validated a German version of DSQIID (DSQIID-G) among adults with ID attending a German clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Procedures/Outcomes</h3><p>DSQIID-G was completed by the caregivers of 104 adults with ID at baseline (T1), 94 at six months (T2) and 83 at 12 months (T3). A Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) was used to determine the total DSQIID-G cutoff score for the best fit between sensitivity and specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen of the 104 participants at T1 (15%) received a diagnosis of dementia. At T1, the scores among the non-dementia group ranged from 0 to 33 (mean: 6.7; SD: 7.65), and the dementia group ranged from 3 to 43 (mean: 22.12; SD: 11.6). The intergroup difference was statistically significant (W: 158; p &lt; .001) (AUC:.89). A total score of 9 provided the best fit between sensitivity (.94) and specificity (.72).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>DSQIID-G total score can discriminate between dementia and non-dementia cases in adults with ID. A lower cutoff score with a higher sensitivity is desirable for a screening instrument.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000532/pdfft?md5=e95948aa748d6e462a871b19f647139c&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000532-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the German version of the DSQIID in adults with intellectual disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Daria Tarasova ,&nbsp;Peggy Rösner ,&nbsp;Shoumitro Deb ,&nbsp;Tanja Sappok\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An observer-rated screening questionnaire for dementia for people with intellectual disabilities (ID), DSQIID, was developed in the UK. So far, the German version has not yet been validated in adults with ID.</p></div><div><h3>Aims/Methods</h3><p>We validated a German version of DSQIID (DSQIID-G) among adults with ID attending a German clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Procedures/Outcomes</h3><p>DSQIID-G was completed by the caregivers of 104 adults with ID at baseline (T1), 94 at six months (T2) and 83 at 12 months (T3). A Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) was used to determine the total DSQIID-G cutoff score for the best fit between sensitivity and specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen of the 104 participants at T1 (15%) received a diagnosis of dementia. At T1, the scores among the non-dementia group ranged from 0 to 33 (mean: 6.7; SD: 7.65), and the dementia group ranged from 3 to 43 (mean: 22.12; SD: 11.6). The intergroup difference was statistically significant (W: 158; p &lt; .001) (AUC:.89). A total score of 9 provided the best fit between sensitivity (.94) and specificity (.72).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>DSQIID-G total score can discriminate between dementia and non-dementia cases in adults with ID. A lower cutoff score with a higher sensitivity is desirable for a screening instrument.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000532/pdfft?md5=e95948aa748d6e462a871b19f647139c&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000532-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景由观察者评分的智障人士痴呆症筛查问卷 DSQIID 由英国开发。程序/结果104 名成年智障人士的照顾者分别在基线(T1)、6 个月(T2)和 12 个月(T3)时填写了 DSQIID-G 的问卷,其中 94 人填写了问卷,83 人填写了问卷。采用接收者工作曲线(ROC)来确定灵敏度和特异性之间最匹配的 DSQIID-G 临界总分。结果104 名参与者中有 16 人(15%)在 T1 时被诊断为痴呆。在 T1 阶段,非痴呆组的得分范围为 0 到 33(平均值:6.7;标清值:7.65),痴呆组的得分范围为 3 到 43(平均值:22.12;标清值:11.6)。组间差异具有统计学意义(W:158;p <;.001)(AUC:.89)。总分 9 分是灵敏度(.94)和特异度(.72)之间的最佳匹配值。结论和启示DSQIID-G 总分可以区分智障成人痴呆和非痴呆病例。对于筛查工具而言,较低的临界值和较高的灵敏度是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the German version of the DSQIID in adults with intellectual disabilities

Background

An observer-rated screening questionnaire for dementia for people with intellectual disabilities (ID), DSQIID, was developed in the UK. So far, the German version has not yet been validated in adults with ID.

Aims/Methods

We validated a German version of DSQIID (DSQIID-G) among adults with ID attending a German clinic.

Procedures/Outcomes

DSQIID-G was completed by the caregivers of 104 adults with ID at baseline (T1), 94 at six months (T2) and 83 at 12 months (T3). A Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) was used to determine the total DSQIID-G cutoff score for the best fit between sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Sixteen of the 104 participants at T1 (15%) received a diagnosis of dementia. At T1, the scores among the non-dementia group ranged from 0 to 33 (mean: 6.7; SD: 7.65), and the dementia group ranged from 3 to 43 (mean: 22.12; SD: 11.6). The intergroup difference was statistically significant (W: 158; p < .001) (AUC:.89). A total score of 9 provided the best fit between sensitivity (.94) and specificity (.72).

Conclusions and Implications

DSQIID-G total score can discriminate between dementia and non-dementia cases in adults with ID. A lower cutoff score with a higher sensitivity is desirable for a screening instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Being the other child - A systematic review on the quality of life and mental health of siblings of children with rare diseases SPAN-ASD: Pilot implementation to promote functional goals of autistic adolescents and young adults A systematic review of educational interventions to enhance cancer awareness and screening in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A mixed-methods approach Working memory training in students with dyslexia: Additional effects to reading and spelling remediation not likely The effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information processing speed in children with intellectual disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1