欧洲五国消费者在购买肉类和乳制品时,将动物福利置于环境可持续性之上

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105179
Jeanine Ammann , Gabriele Mack , Nadja El Benni , Shan Jin , Paul Newell-Price , Sophie Tindale , Erik Hunter , Victoria Vicario-Modroño , Rosa Gallardo-Cobos , Pedro Sánchez-Zamora , Simona Miškolci , Lynn J. Frewer
{"title":"欧洲五国消费者在购买肉类和乳制品时,将动物福利置于环境可持续性之上","authors":"Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Gabriele Mack ,&nbsp;Nadja El Benni ,&nbsp;Shan Jin ,&nbsp;Paul Newell-Price ,&nbsp;Sophie Tindale ,&nbsp;Erik Hunter ,&nbsp;Victoria Vicario-Modroño ,&nbsp;Rosa Gallardo-Cobos ,&nbsp;Pedro Sánchez-Zamora ,&nbsp;Simona Miškolci ,&nbsp;Lynn J. Frewer","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food production systems, especially meat and dairy supply chains, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. An important question emerges as to whether consumers care about environmental sustainability when buying food products, as this can determine their consumption practices. Further, if sustainability labels are available, identifying information that is relevant to consumers is important. This research therefore aimed to identify the attributes that are most important for consumers when buying meat or dairy products and the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels for meat and dairy products and important label properties. An online survey was conducted in five European countries (i.e. Czechia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK). Consumers valued similar attributes when buying meat and dairy products across all countries. <em>Freshness</em>, <em>quality/taste</em> and <em>animal welfare</em> emerged as the most important attributes, while environmental attributes such as <em>food miles</em>, <em>carbon footprint</em>, and <em>organic production</em> were the least important. Sustainability labels for meat and dairy products were perceived as helpful. Regression analysis identified similar patterns within all five countries regarding the predictors of the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels. Attitudes towards <em>sustainable food consumption</em>, <em>environmental attitudes</em>, and <em>food production and policies</em> emerged as significant positive predictors in most models. Most importantly, information regarding <em>animal welfare</em>, <em>food safety</em>, and <em>health and nutrition</em> was perceived as being more important than <em>environmental sustainability</em>. This suggests that food choice decisions are unlikely to be made based on the environmental sustainability of a food product’s production alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818/pdfft?md5=6563bdfad7d26639e1ed49a9f622fce6&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000818-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers across five European countries prioritise animal welfare above environmental sustainability when buying meat and dairy products\",\"authors\":\"Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Gabriele Mack ,&nbsp;Nadja El Benni ,&nbsp;Shan Jin ,&nbsp;Paul Newell-Price ,&nbsp;Sophie Tindale ,&nbsp;Erik Hunter ,&nbsp;Victoria Vicario-Modroño ,&nbsp;Rosa Gallardo-Cobos ,&nbsp;Pedro Sánchez-Zamora ,&nbsp;Simona Miškolci ,&nbsp;Lynn J. Frewer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Food production systems, especially meat and dairy supply chains, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. An important question emerges as to whether consumers care about environmental sustainability when buying food products, as this can determine their consumption practices. Further, if sustainability labels are available, identifying information that is relevant to consumers is important. This research therefore aimed to identify the attributes that are most important for consumers when buying meat or dairy products and the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels for meat and dairy products and important label properties. An online survey was conducted in five European countries (i.e. Czechia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK). Consumers valued similar attributes when buying meat and dairy products across all countries. <em>Freshness</em>, <em>quality/taste</em> and <em>animal welfare</em> emerged as the most important attributes, while environmental attributes such as <em>food miles</em>, <em>carbon footprint</em>, and <em>organic production</em> were the least important. Sustainability labels for meat and dairy products were perceived as helpful. Regression analysis identified similar patterns within all five countries regarding the predictors of the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels. Attitudes towards <em>sustainable food consumption</em>, <em>environmental attitudes</em>, and <em>food production and policies</em> emerged as significant positive predictors in most models. Most importantly, information regarding <em>animal welfare</em>, <em>food safety</em>, and <em>health and nutrition</em> was perceived as being more important than <em>environmental sustainability</em>. This suggests that food choice decisions are unlikely to be made based on the environmental sustainability of a food product’s production alone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818/pdfft?md5=6563bdfad7d26639e1ed49a9f622fce6&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000818-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食品生产系统,尤其是肉类和乳制品供应链,会造成温室气体排放。一个重要的问题是,消费者在购买食品时是否关心环境的可持续性,因为这可以决定他们的消费行为。此外,如果有可持续标签,确定与消费者相关的信息也很重要。因此,本研究旨在确定消费者在购买肉类或乳制品时最关心的属性,以及肉类和乳制品可持续性标签的有用性和重要的标签属性。在五个欧洲国家(即捷克、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士和英国)进行了在线调查。所有国家的消费者在购买肉类和乳制品时都看重类似的属性。新鲜度、质量/口味和动物福利成为最重要的属性,而食物里程、碳足迹和有机生产等环境属性则最不重要。人们认为肉类和乳制品的可持续性标签很有帮助。回归分析表明,在所有五个国家中,对可持续标签有用性的预测因素存在相似的模式。在大多数模型中,对可持续食品消费的态度、环保态度以及食品生产和政策都是重要的正向预测因素。最重要的是,动物福利、食品安全、健康和营养方面的信息被认为比环境可持续性更重要。这表明,人们不太可能仅仅根据食品生产的环境可持续性来做出食品选择决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumers across five European countries prioritise animal welfare above environmental sustainability when buying meat and dairy products

Food production systems, especially meat and dairy supply chains, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. An important question emerges as to whether consumers care about environmental sustainability when buying food products, as this can determine their consumption practices. Further, if sustainability labels are available, identifying information that is relevant to consumers is important. This research therefore aimed to identify the attributes that are most important for consumers when buying meat or dairy products and the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels for meat and dairy products and important label properties. An online survey was conducted in five European countries (i.e. Czechia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK). Consumers valued similar attributes when buying meat and dairy products across all countries. Freshness, quality/taste and animal welfare emerged as the most important attributes, while environmental attributes such as food miles, carbon footprint, and organic production were the least important. Sustainability labels for meat and dairy products were perceived as helpful. Regression analysis identified similar patterns within all five countries regarding the predictors of the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels. Attitudes towards sustainable food consumption, environmental attitudes, and food production and policies emerged as significant positive predictors in most models. Most importantly, information regarding animal welfare, food safety, and health and nutrition was perceived as being more important than environmental sustainability. This suggests that food choice decisions are unlikely to be made based on the environmental sustainability of a food product’s production alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Snack attack: What factors affect American snacking behavior? Themes and sentiments in conversations about food waste on Twitter: Proposal of a framework using neural topic modeling Health Star Rating Labels: A systematic review and future research agenda Momentum for organic food purchase intention and actual adoption- moderating effects of social media influencer and celebrity endorser Segmenting and profiling seaweed consumers: A cross-cultural comparison of Australia, the United Kingdom and Croatia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1