好东西太多?医学教育中的团队合作。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-31 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2331050
Michael Bordonaro
{"title":"好东西太多?医学教育中的团队合作。","authors":"Michael Bordonaro","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2331050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teams and the promotion of teamwork for both faculty and for students can be key components of integrated curriculum and 'flipped classroom' active learning approaches for medical education. The benefits of teams and teamwork are presented to faculty and students, sometimes <i>via</i> indoctrination, but the costs of the team approach, balanced against the purported benefits, are typically not discussed. This unbalanced presentation creates the need for a statement of a contrarian view. I posit that among the problems of teams and teamwork in education are diminishment of individual initiative and individual responsibility, lowering standards to the least common denominator, creating excess obligations with respect toward weaker team members, negative effects on academic freedom, inconsistency with respect to how faculty and students are evaluated, and giving students a somewhat false view of their accountability as a medical professional. Possible ideological considerations and attitudes toward individualism with respect to teams need to be understood as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"166-167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too much of a good thing? Teamwork in medical education.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Bordonaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2331050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Teams and the promotion of teamwork for both faculty and for students can be key components of integrated curriculum and 'flipped classroom' active learning approaches for medical education. The benefits of teams and teamwork are presented to faculty and students, sometimes <i>via</i> indoctrination, but the costs of the team approach, balanced against the purported benefits, are typically not discussed. This unbalanced presentation creates the need for a statement of a contrarian view. I posit that among the problems of teams and teamwork in education are diminishment of individual initiative and individual responsibility, lowering standards to the least common denominator, creating excess obligations with respect toward weaker team members, negative effects on academic freedom, inconsistency with respect to how faculty and students are evaluated, and giving students a somewhat false view of their accountability as a medical professional. Possible ideological considerations and attitudes toward individualism with respect to teams need to be understood as well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"166-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2331050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2331050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

团队以及促进教师和学生的团队合作可以成为医学教育综合课程和 "翻转课堂 "主动学习方法的关键组成部分。团队和团队合作的益处被介绍给教师和学生,有时是通过灌输的方式,但团队方法的成本与所谓的益处之间的平衡通常不被讨论。这种不平衡的表述使得我们有必要陈述一种相反的观点。我认为,团队和团队合作在教育中存在的问题包括:削弱个人主动性和个人责任;降低标准,使之成为最小公分母;对较弱的团队成员产生过多的义务;对学术自由产生负面影响;对教师和学生的评价方式不一致;使学生对自己作为医学专业人员的责任产生错误的看法。此外,还需要了解团队中可能存在的意识形态因素和个人主义态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Too much of a good thing? Teamwork in medical education.

Teams and the promotion of teamwork for both faculty and for students can be key components of integrated curriculum and 'flipped classroom' active learning approaches for medical education. The benefits of teams and teamwork are presented to faculty and students, sometimes via indoctrination, but the costs of the team approach, balanced against the purported benefits, are typically not discussed. This unbalanced presentation creates the need for a statement of a contrarian view. I posit that among the problems of teams and teamwork in education are diminishment of individual initiative and individual responsibility, lowering standards to the least common denominator, creating excess obligations with respect toward weaker team members, negative effects on academic freedom, inconsistency with respect to how faculty and students are evaluated, and giving students a somewhat false view of their accountability as a medical professional. Possible ideological considerations and attitudes toward individualism with respect to teams need to be understood as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Blind spots in medical education - International perspectives. Breaking down barriers and building up facilitators of lecture free curriculum in medical education: An interpretive structural modeling. Physical and biophysical markers of assessment in medical training: A scoping review of the literature. Proposing the Community Triad Model to action social accountability in medical schools. Was it all worth it? A graduating resident perspective on CBME.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1