Zhoupeng Lu, Hui Zou, Peng Zhao, Jialin Wang, Ruirui Wang
{"title":"治疗紧张型颈源性头痛或偏头痛的肌筋膜松解术:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Zhoupeng Lu, Hui Zou, Peng Zhao, Jialin Wang, Ruirui Wang","doi":"10.1155/2024/2042069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To assess the effectiveness of myofascial release (MFR) techniques on the intensity of headache pain and associated disability in patients with tension-type headache (TTH), cervicogenic headache (CGH), or migraine. Design. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods. Eight databases were searched on September 15, 2023, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang Database. The risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Results. Pooled results showed that MFR intervention significantly reduces pain intensity [SMD = −2.01, 95% CI (−2.98, −1.03), I2 = 90%, P<0.001] and improves disability [SMD = −1.3, 95% CI (−1.82, −0.79), I2 = 74%, P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis based on the type of headache revealed significant reductions in pain intensity for CGH [SMD = −2.01, 95% CI (−2.73, −1.29), I2 = 63%, P<0.001], TTH [SMD = −0.86, 95% CI (−1.52, −0.20), I2 = 50%, P=0.01] and migraine [SMD = −6.52, 95% CI (−8.15, −4.89), P<0.001] and in disability for CGH [SMD = −1.45, 95% CI (−2.07, −0.83), I2 = 0%, P<0.001]; TTH [SMD = −0.98, 95% CI (−1.32, −0.65), I2 = 0%, P<0.001] but not migraine [SMD = −2.44, 95% CI (−6.04, 1.16), I2 = 97%, P=0.18]. Conclusion. The meta-analysis results indicate that MFR intervention can significantly alleviate pain and disability in TTH and CGH. For migraine, however, the results were inconsistent, and there was only moderate quality evidence of disability improvement for TTH and CGH. In contrast, the quality of other evidence was low or very low.","PeriodicalId":501829,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Management","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myofascial Release for the Treatment of Tension-Type, Cervicogenic Headache or Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zhoupeng Lu, Hui Zou, Peng Zhao, Jialin Wang, Ruirui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2042069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To assess the effectiveness of myofascial release (MFR) techniques on the intensity of headache pain and associated disability in patients with tension-type headache (TTH), cervicogenic headache (CGH), or migraine. Design. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods. Eight databases were searched on September 15, 2023, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang Database. The risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Results. Pooled results showed that MFR intervention significantly reduces pain intensity [SMD = −2.01, 95% CI (−2.98, −1.03), I2 = 90%, P<0.001] and improves disability [SMD = −1.3, 95% CI (−1.82, −0.79), I2 = 74%, P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis based on the type of headache revealed significant reductions in pain intensity for CGH [SMD = −2.01, 95% CI (−2.73, −1.29), I2 = 63%, P<0.001], TTH [SMD = −0.86, 95% CI (−1.52, −0.20), I2 = 50%, P=0.01] and migraine [SMD = −6.52, 95% CI (−8.15, −4.89), P<0.001] and in disability for CGH [SMD = −1.45, 95% CI (−2.07, −0.83), I2 = 0%, P<0.001]; TTH [SMD = −0.98, 95% CI (−1.32, −0.65), I2 = 0%, P<0.001] but not migraine [SMD = −2.44, 95% CI (−6.04, 1.16), I2 = 97%, P=0.18]. Conclusion. The meta-analysis results indicate that MFR intervention can significantly alleviate pain and disability in TTH and CGH. For migraine, however, the results were inconsistent, and there was only moderate quality evidence of disability improvement for TTH and CGH. In contrast, the quality of other evidence was low or very low.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research and Management\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2042069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2042069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估肌筋膜松解(MFR)技术对紧张型头痛(TTH)、颈源性头痛(CGH)或偏头痛患者的头痛疼痛强度和相关残疾的有效性。设计。系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法。于 2023 年 9 月 15 日检索了 8 个数据库,包括 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Embase、CNKI 和万方数据库。利用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2(RoB 2)工具评估了偏倚风险。结果显示汇总结果显示,MFR 干预能显著降低疼痛强度[SMD = -2.01,95% CI (-2.98, -1.03), I2 = 90%, P<0.001]并改善残疾状况[SMD = -1.3, 95% CI (-1.82, -0.79),I2 = 74%, P<0.001]。基于头痛类型的亚组分析显示,CGH [SMD = -2.01,95% CI (-2.73,-1.29),I2 = 63%,P<0.001]、TTH [SMD = -0.86,95% CI (-1.52,-0.20),I2 = 50%, P=0.01] 和偏头痛 [SMD = -6.52,95% CI (-8.15,-4.89),P<0.001],以及CGH[SMD =-1.45,95% CI (-2.07,-0.83),I2 = 0%,P<0.001];TTH[SMD = -0.98,95% CI (-1.32,-0.65),I2 = 0%,P<0.001],但偏头痛没有[SMD = -2.44,95% CI (-6.04,1.16),I2 = 97%,P=0.18]。结论荟萃分析结果表明,MFR干预能显著减轻TTH和CGH的疼痛和残疾。然而,偏头痛的研究结果并不一致,仅有中等质量的证据表明TTH和CGH的残疾情况有所改善。相比之下,其他证据的质量较低或很低。
Myofascial Release for the Treatment of Tension-Type, Cervicogenic Headache or Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective. To assess the effectiveness of myofascial release (MFR) techniques on the intensity of headache pain and associated disability in patients with tension-type headache (TTH), cervicogenic headache (CGH), or migraine. Design. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods. Eight databases were searched on September 15, 2023, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang Database. The risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Results. Pooled results showed that MFR intervention significantly reduces pain intensity [SMD = −2.01, 95% CI (−2.98, −1.03), I2 = 90%, P<0.001] and improves disability [SMD = −1.3, 95% CI (−1.82, −0.79), I2 = 74%, P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis based on the type of headache revealed significant reductions in pain intensity for CGH [SMD = −2.01, 95% CI (−2.73, −1.29), I2 = 63%, P<0.001], TTH [SMD = −0.86, 95% CI (−1.52, −0.20), I2 = 50%, P=0.01] and migraine [SMD = −6.52, 95% CI (−8.15, −4.89), P<0.001] and in disability for CGH [SMD = −1.45, 95% CI (−2.07, −0.83), I2 = 0%, P<0.001]; TTH [SMD = −0.98, 95% CI (−1.32, −0.65), I2 = 0%, P<0.001] but not migraine [SMD = −2.44, 95% CI (−6.04, 1.16), I2 = 97%, P=0.18]. Conclusion. The meta-analysis results indicate that MFR intervention can significantly alleviate pain and disability in TTH and CGH. For migraine, however, the results were inconsistent, and there was only moderate quality evidence of disability improvement for TTH and CGH. In contrast, the quality of other evidence was low or very low.