三管锥形能量吸收器在轴向压缩下的性能

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.15282/jmes.18.1.2024.6.0781
Asad Khalid, S. M. Rohaizan
{"title":"三管锥形能量吸收器在轴向压缩下的性能","authors":"Asad Khalid, S. M. Rohaizan","doi":"10.15282/jmes.18.1.2024.6.0781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quasi static axial compression loading on tri-tubular cone (TC) has been carried out using LS-DYNA finite element analysis method. Tri-tubular cones of three arrangements; the first arrangement (model TC-1) consists of cone heights of 50 mm, 75 mm and 100 mm where the inner cone is the maximum height. The second arrangement (model TC-2) consists of cone heights of 100 mm, 75 mm, and 50 mm where the outer cone is the maximum height. The third arrangement (model TC-3) consists of three cones of the same height of 100 mm. Cone semi vertex angle of 20o was maintained for all tri-tubular cones tested. Materials used for this research are glass, jute and jute-glass/epoxy. Crashworthiness analyses were performed to investigate the effect of material used, and tri-tubular cone arrangement on peak load. Crush efficiency, and absorbed energy were drawn and discussed. Failure mechanism of the fractured specimens was also discussed. Effect of number of layers and fiber stacking sequence were also investigated. Results show that the cone arrangement TC-3 gives better performance than the cone arrangement TC-2 followed by the cone arrangement TC-1. Maximum load obtained by tri-tubular cone type TC-3 was found higher 7.09% and 14.96% than TC-2 and TC-1 respectively for glass/epoxy. Material saving was achieved by using tri-tubular cones of different heights under compression. Material used has significant influence on the absorbed energy. Failure mode of tri-tubular conical energy absorber was presented and discussed.","PeriodicalId":16166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of tri-tubular conical energy absorber under axial compression\",\"authors\":\"Asad Khalid, S. M. Rohaizan\",\"doi\":\"10.15282/jmes.18.1.2024.6.0781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quasi static axial compression loading on tri-tubular cone (TC) has been carried out using LS-DYNA finite element analysis method. Tri-tubular cones of three arrangements; the first arrangement (model TC-1) consists of cone heights of 50 mm, 75 mm and 100 mm where the inner cone is the maximum height. The second arrangement (model TC-2) consists of cone heights of 100 mm, 75 mm, and 50 mm where the outer cone is the maximum height. The third arrangement (model TC-3) consists of three cones of the same height of 100 mm. Cone semi vertex angle of 20o was maintained for all tri-tubular cones tested. Materials used for this research are glass, jute and jute-glass/epoxy. Crashworthiness analyses were performed to investigate the effect of material used, and tri-tubular cone arrangement on peak load. Crush efficiency, and absorbed energy were drawn and discussed. Failure mechanism of the fractured specimens was also discussed. Effect of number of layers and fiber stacking sequence were also investigated. Results show that the cone arrangement TC-3 gives better performance than the cone arrangement TC-2 followed by the cone arrangement TC-1. Maximum load obtained by tri-tubular cone type TC-3 was found higher 7.09% and 14.96% than TC-2 and TC-1 respectively for glass/epoxy. Material saving was achieved by using tri-tubular cones of different heights under compression. Material used has significant influence on the absorbed energy. Failure mode of tri-tubular conical energy absorber was presented and discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.18.1.2024.6.0781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.18.1.2024.6.0781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用 LS-DYNA 有限元分析方法对三管状锥体 (TC) 进行了准静态轴向压缩加载。三管状锥体有三种排列方式:第一种排列方式(TC-1 型)的锥体高度分别为 50 毫米、75 毫米和 100 毫米,其中内锥体为最大高度。第二种布置(TC-2 型)的锥体高度分别为 100 毫米、75 毫米和 50 毫米,其中外锥体为最大高度。第三种布置(TC-3 型)由三个高度相同的锥体组成,高度均为 100 毫米。所有测试的三管锥体的半顶角都保持在 20o。本研究使用的材料有玻璃、黄麻和黄麻-玻璃/环氧树脂。进行了耐撞性分析,以研究所用材料和三管锥体排列对峰值载荷的影响。得出并讨论了挤压效率和吸收能量。还讨论了断裂试样的失效机理。此外,还研究了层数和纤维堆叠顺序的影响。结果表明,锥形排列 TC-3 比锥形排列 TC-2 性能更好,其次是锥形排列 TC-1。对于玻璃/环氧树脂,TC-3 型三管锥获得的最大载荷分别比 TC-2 和 TC-1 高出 7.09% 和 14.96%。使用不同高度的三管锥体进行压缩可以节省材料。所用材料对吸收的能量有很大影响。介绍并讨论了三管锥形能量吸收器的失效模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of tri-tubular conical energy absorber under axial compression
Quasi static axial compression loading on tri-tubular cone (TC) has been carried out using LS-DYNA finite element analysis method. Tri-tubular cones of three arrangements; the first arrangement (model TC-1) consists of cone heights of 50 mm, 75 mm and 100 mm where the inner cone is the maximum height. The second arrangement (model TC-2) consists of cone heights of 100 mm, 75 mm, and 50 mm where the outer cone is the maximum height. The third arrangement (model TC-3) consists of three cones of the same height of 100 mm. Cone semi vertex angle of 20o was maintained for all tri-tubular cones tested. Materials used for this research are glass, jute and jute-glass/epoxy. Crashworthiness analyses were performed to investigate the effect of material used, and tri-tubular cone arrangement on peak load. Crush efficiency, and absorbed energy were drawn and discussed. Failure mechanism of the fractured specimens was also discussed. Effect of number of layers and fiber stacking sequence were also investigated. Results show that the cone arrangement TC-3 gives better performance than the cone arrangement TC-2 followed by the cone arrangement TC-1. Maximum load obtained by tri-tubular cone type TC-3 was found higher 7.09% and 14.96% than TC-2 and TC-1 respectively for glass/epoxy. Material saving was achieved by using tri-tubular cones of different heights under compression. Material used has significant influence on the absorbed energy. Failure mode of tri-tubular conical energy absorber was presented and discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Engineering & Sciences "JMES" (ISSN (Print): 2289-4659; e-ISSN: 2231-8380) is an open access peer-review journal (Indexed by Emerging Source Citation Index (ESCI), WOS; SCOPUS Index (Elsevier); EBSCOhost; Index Copernicus; Ulrichsweb, DOAJ, Google Scholar) which publishes original and review articles that advance the understanding of both the fundamentals of engineering science and its application to the solution of challenges and problems in mechanical engineering systems, machines and components. It is particularly concerned with the demonstration of engineering science solutions to specific industrial problems. Original contributions providing insight into the use of analytical, computational modeling, structural mechanics, metal forming, behavior and application of advanced materials, impact mechanics, strain localization and other effects of nonlinearity, fluid mechanics, robotics, tribology, thermodynamics, and materials processing generally from the core of the journal contents are encouraged. Only original, innovative and novel papers will be considered for publication in the JMES. The authors are required to confirm that their paper has not been submitted to any other journal in English or any other language. The JMES welcome contributions from all who wishes to report on new developments and latest findings in mechanical engineering.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of collision estimation with vehicle and pedestrian using CARLA simulation software Active suspension for all-terrain vehicle with intelligent control using artificial neural networks The influence of helmet certification in motorcycle helmets protective performance Sustainable considerations in additive manufacturing processes: A review Co-simulation approach for computational aero-acoustic modeling: Investigating wind-induced noise within two-way radio microphone ports cavity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1