醋和碳酸氢钠对耐抗生素大肠杆菌的协同和拮抗作用

F. Al-Khikani, Hassan Tahir Fareeq, Hassan Abbas Mohammed, Baraa Waleed Jassem, Baraa Wissam Abdul-Hussein, Aya Abdul-Kadhim Banay, Baneen Abd-Ali Jawad, Tabarak Hakeem Hamza, Balqees Malik Hilal
{"title":"醋和碳酸氢钠对耐抗生素大肠杆菌的协同和拮抗作用","authors":"F. Al-Khikani, Hassan Tahir Fareeq, Hassan Abbas Mohammed, Baraa Waleed Jassem, Baraa Wissam Abdul-Hussein, Aya Abdul-Kadhim Banay, Baneen Abd-Ali Jawad, Tabarak Hakeem Hamza, Balqees Malik Hilal","doi":"10.4103/abhs.abhs_82_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n Escherichia coli with antimicrobial resistance has become a frequent global problem in recent decades, which makes it challenging to treat with conventional medicines. This study aimed to evaluate different strategies for managing microbial resistance.\n \n \n \n \n E. coli was isolated from wounds and the urinary tract infections and then cultured on blood agar, MacConkey agar and EMB media. The well diffusion method was used to evaluate the activity of vinegar (5%) alone and combined with three concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) of sodium bicarbonate (SBC). The diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured in millimeters. Statistical analyses were performed using Excel and the SPSS 26 software.\n \n \n \n Of the 24 E. coli isolates, approximately 66.6% were sensitive to vinegar combined with 5% SBC compared to 75% sensitivity to vinegar alone. Furthermore, 41.66% of the bacteria were sensitive to vinegar combined with 10% SBC. This study showed that 33.33% of the bacteria were sensitive to vinegar combined with 20% SBC. Comparison of the mean of the inhibition zone for vinegar 13 ± 6.04 mm alone with 20% SBC plus vinegar 7.83 ± 5.56 mm was significant (P = 0.01). Vinegar combined with 10% SBC had an inhibitory effect (antagonism) on the antibacterial activity of vinegar (P = 0.02).\n \n \n \n The antibacterial efficacy of vinegar with SBC decreased with increasing SBC concentrations, demonstrating an antagonistic effect owing to sodium acetate formation.\n","PeriodicalId":502560,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences","volume":"1 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic and antagonistic effects of vinegar and sodium bicarbonate on antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli\",\"authors\":\"F. Al-Khikani, Hassan Tahir Fareeq, Hassan Abbas Mohammed, Baraa Waleed Jassem, Baraa Wissam Abdul-Hussein, Aya Abdul-Kadhim Banay, Baneen Abd-Ali Jawad, Tabarak Hakeem Hamza, Balqees Malik Hilal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/abhs.abhs_82_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\n Escherichia coli with antimicrobial resistance has become a frequent global problem in recent decades, which makes it challenging to treat with conventional medicines. This study aimed to evaluate different strategies for managing microbial resistance.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n E. coli was isolated from wounds and the urinary tract infections and then cultured on blood agar, MacConkey agar and EMB media. The well diffusion method was used to evaluate the activity of vinegar (5%) alone and combined with three concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) of sodium bicarbonate (SBC). The diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured in millimeters. Statistical analyses were performed using Excel and the SPSS 26 software.\\n \\n \\n \\n Of the 24 E. coli isolates, approximately 66.6% were sensitive to vinegar combined with 5% SBC compared to 75% sensitivity to vinegar alone. Furthermore, 41.66% of the bacteria were sensitive to vinegar combined with 10% SBC. This study showed that 33.33% of the bacteria were sensitive to vinegar combined with 20% SBC. Comparison of the mean of the inhibition zone for vinegar 13 ± 6.04 mm alone with 20% SBC plus vinegar 7.83 ± 5.56 mm was significant (P = 0.01). Vinegar combined with 10% SBC had an inhibitory effect (antagonism) on the antibacterial activity of vinegar (P = 0.02).\\n \\n \\n \\n The antibacterial efficacy of vinegar with SBC decreased with increasing SBC concentrations, demonstrating an antagonistic effect owing to sodium acetate formation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":502560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/abhs.abhs_82_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abhs.abhs_82_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,对抗生素产生抗药性的大肠埃希菌已成为一个频发的全球性问题,这使得用常规药物治疗具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估管理微生物耐药性的不同策略。 研究人员从伤口和尿路感染处分离出大肠杆菌,然后在血琼脂、麦康凯琼脂和 EMB 培养基上进行培养。采用井扩散法评估醋(5%)单独和与三种浓度(5%、10% 和 20%)的碳酸氢钠(SBC)混合后的活性。抑制区的直径以毫米为单位。统计分析使用 Excel 和 SPSS 26 软件进行。 在 24 个大肠杆菌分离物中,约有 66.6% 对结合了 5% SBC 的食醋敏感,而对单独食醋的敏感度为 75%。此外,41.66%的细菌对醋和 10%的 SBC 混合液敏感。这项研究表明,33.33% 的细菌对醋与 20% SBC 混合使用敏感。单独使用食醋的抑菌区平均值为 13 ± 6.04 mm,而 20% SBC 加食醋的抑菌区平均值为 7.83 ± 5.56 mm,两者相比差异显著(P = 0.01)。醋与 10% SBC 的结合对醋的抗菌活性有抑制作用(拮抗作用)(P = 0.02)。 醋与 SBC 的抗菌效果随着 SBC 浓度的增加而降低,这表明醋酸钠的形成产生了拮抗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synergistic and antagonistic effects of vinegar and sodium bicarbonate on antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli with antimicrobial resistance has become a frequent global problem in recent decades, which makes it challenging to treat with conventional medicines. This study aimed to evaluate different strategies for managing microbial resistance. E. coli was isolated from wounds and the urinary tract infections and then cultured on blood agar, MacConkey agar and EMB media. The well diffusion method was used to evaluate the activity of vinegar (5%) alone and combined with three concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) of sodium bicarbonate (SBC). The diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured in millimeters. Statistical analyses were performed using Excel and the SPSS 26 software. Of the 24 E. coli isolates, approximately 66.6% were sensitive to vinegar combined with 5% SBC compared to 75% sensitivity to vinegar alone. Furthermore, 41.66% of the bacteria were sensitive to vinegar combined with 10% SBC. This study showed that 33.33% of the bacteria were sensitive to vinegar combined with 20% SBC. Comparison of the mean of the inhibition zone for vinegar 13 ± 6.04 mm alone with 20% SBC plus vinegar 7.83 ± 5.56 mm was significant (P = 0.01). Vinegar combined with 10% SBC had an inhibitory effect (antagonism) on the antibacterial activity of vinegar (P = 0.02). The antibacterial efficacy of vinegar with SBC decreased with increasing SBC concentrations, demonstrating an antagonistic effect owing to sodium acetate formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synergistic and antagonistic effects of vinegar and sodium bicarbonate on antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli Hydropneumothorax as a rare manifestation of primary pulmonary hydatid disease Review of occupational exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in wastewater and its implications in the gulf region Strategies for humanizing technology in health profession education Heat-induced changes in the histomorphometry of human femur bone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1