{"title":"对现代国际关系理论的评估","authors":"Bledar Kurti","doi":"10.58885/ijllis.v13i1.49bk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scholarship of traditional International Relations Theory (IR) seems that has little to say to students, academicians and analysts at present days. The events of the last decade in world politics and the present geopolitical situation seem to have passed the centuries old relations between nations, accompanied with a new and unprecedented approach to international formal conventions and agreements. Modern political leaders often use elements of traditional IR theory when articulating solutions to national and international security dilemmas. But these solutions then translate into modern policies capturing courses of action for accomplishing national objectives with varying strategic implications. It appears that policies of today convert into acts aiming at strengthening power and influence, via corporations and military means. This paper presents the incompatibility of traditional IR theory with the modern one, accompanied with examples and analysis of the key events that have startled academicians, students and interpreters of IR studies.","PeriodicalId":364929,"journal":{"name":"ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN ASSESSMENT OF MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY\",\"authors\":\"Bledar Kurti\",\"doi\":\"10.58885/ijllis.v13i1.49bk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scholarship of traditional International Relations Theory (IR) seems that has little to say to students, academicians and analysts at present days. The events of the last decade in world politics and the present geopolitical situation seem to have passed the centuries old relations between nations, accompanied with a new and unprecedented approach to international formal conventions and agreements. Modern political leaders often use elements of traditional IR theory when articulating solutions to national and international security dilemmas. But these solutions then translate into modern policies capturing courses of action for accomplishing national objectives with varying strategic implications. It appears that policies of today convert into acts aiming at strengthening power and influence, via corporations and military means. This paper presents the incompatibility of traditional IR theory with the modern one, accompanied with examples and analysis of the key events that have startled academicians, students and interpreters of IR studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58885/ijllis.v13i1.49bk\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58885/ijllis.v13i1.49bk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
传统的国际关系理论(IR)对当今的学生、学者和分析家来说似乎已经没有什么可说的了。过去十年中发生的世界政治事件和当前的地缘政治局势似乎已经超越了几个世纪以来的国家间关系,并伴随着一种前所未有的新方法来处理国际正式公约和协定。现代政治领导人在阐述国家和国际安全困境的解决方案时,经常使用传统国际关系理论的要素。但这些解决方案随后会转化为现代政策,成为实现国家目标的行动方针,并产生不同的战略影响。当今的政策似乎转化为旨在通过企业和军事手段加强权力和影响力的行为。本文介绍了传统 IR 理论与现代 IR 理论的不相容性,并举例分析了令 IR 研究的学者、学生和解释者震惊的关键事件。
AN ASSESSMENT OF MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY
The scholarship of traditional International Relations Theory (IR) seems that has little to say to students, academicians and analysts at present days. The events of the last decade in world politics and the present geopolitical situation seem to have passed the centuries old relations between nations, accompanied with a new and unprecedented approach to international formal conventions and agreements. Modern political leaders often use elements of traditional IR theory when articulating solutions to national and international security dilemmas. But these solutions then translate into modern policies capturing courses of action for accomplishing national objectives with varying strategic implications. It appears that policies of today convert into acts aiming at strengthening power and influence, via corporations and military means. This paper presents the incompatibility of traditional IR theory with the modern one, accompanied with examples and analysis of the key events that have startled academicians, students and interpreters of IR studies.