服务学习和社区参与中的体验提取主义

Sarah Eliza Stanlick
{"title":"服务学习和社区参与中的体验提取主义","authors":"Sarah Eliza Stanlick","doi":"10.18060/27581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extractivism is so often characterized as resource extractivism – the exploitation of a community’s natural resources for economic gain. However, when we think about the relationships between community and university, there are many ways in which the university can take out of the community or benefit to an extent that extracts human, capital, and natural resources. I contend that some of the university-community engagement work that has been done in the last 20 years replicates colonial structures in ways that have harmed communities under the well-intentioned guise of service-learning, community-based learning, or “development.” Drawing on Du Bois (1947) and on Riofrancos’ (2020) work on colonialism and extractivism, this paper will explore the role of the university as both a transformer and oppressor through global learning. I will explore the promise and pitfalls for these engaged pedagogies, and propose pathways to avoiding unjust, extractive practices in the pursuit of learning and student development. I will end with recommendations for just, equitable, and critical community-based global learning and some promising examples.","PeriodicalId":34289,"journal":{"name":"Metropolitan Universities","volume":"18 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiential Extractivism in Service-Learning and Community Engagement\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Eliza Stanlick\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/27581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extractivism is so often characterized as resource extractivism – the exploitation of a community’s natural resources for economic gain. However, when we think about the relationships between community and university, there are many ways in which the university can take out of the community or benefit to an extent that extracts human, capital, and natural resources. I contend that some of the university-community engagement work that has been done in the last 20 years replicates colonial structures in ways that have harmed communities under the well-intentioned guise of service-learning, community-based learning, or “development.” Drawing on Du Bois (1947) and on Riofrancos’ (2020) work on colonialism and extractivism, this paper will explore the role of the university as both a transformer and oppressor through global learning. I will explore the promise and pitfalls for these engaged pedagogies, and propose pathways to avoiding unjust, extractive practices in the pursuit of learning and student development. I will end with recommendations for just, equitable, and critical community-based global learning and some promising examples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metropolitan Universities\",\"volume\":\"18 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metropolitan Universities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/27581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metropolitan Universities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

榨取主义通常被描述为资源榨取主义--为了经济利益而榨取社区的自然资源。然而,当我们思考社区与大学之间的关系时,我们会发现大学可以通过多种方式从社区攫取利益,或在一定程度上攫取人力资源、资本和自然资源。我认为,在过去 20 年中开展的一些大学与社区的互动工作,打着服务学习、社区学习或 "发展 "等善意的幌子,以损害社区的方式复制了殖民结构。本文将借鉴杜波依斯(Du Bois,1947 年)和里奥弗朗科斯(Riofrancos,2020 年)关于殖民主义和榨取主义的著作,探讨大学通过全球学习既是变革者又是压迫者的角色。我将探讨这些参与式教学法的前景和陷阱,并提出在追求学习和学生发展的过程中避免不公正、榨取性做法的途径。最后,我将就基于社区的公正、公平和批判性全球学习提出建议,并列举一些有前途的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiential Extractivism in Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Extractivism is so often characterized as resource extractivism – the exploitation of a community’s natural resources for economic gain. However, when we think about the relationships between community and university, there are many ways in which the university can take out of the community or benefit to an extent that extracts human, capital, and natural resources. I contend that some of the university-community engagement work that has been done in the last 20 years replicates colonial structures in ways that have harmed communities under the well-intentioned guise of service-learning, community-based learning, or “development.” Drawing on Du Bois (1947) and on Riofrancos’ (2020) work on colonialism and extractivism, this paper will explore the role of the university as both a transformer and oppressor through global learning. I will explore the promise and pitfalls for these engaged pedagogies, and propose pathways to avoiding unjust, extractive practices in the pursuit of learning and student development. I will end with recommendations for just, equitable, and critical community-based global learning and some promising examples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scholar-Administrators as Leaders Finances and Future Health Student Support and Retention Diversity and Free Expression in Higher Education Intersecting Assets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1