Mohammed Dauda Goni, Abdulqudus Bola Aroyehun, Shariza Abdul Razak, W. Drammeh, Muhammad Adamu Abbas
{"title":"马来西亚的粮食不安全状况:评估 COVID-19 大流行期间流动管制令的影响","authors":"Mohammed Dauda Goni, Abdulqudus Bola Aroyehun, Shariza Abdul Razak, W. Drammeh, Muhammad Adamu Abbas","doi":"10.1108/nfs-08-2023-0172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to assess the household food insecurity in Malaysia during the initial phase of the movement control order (MCO) to provide insights into the prevalence and predictors of food insecurity in this context.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research used an online cross-sectional survey between March 28 and April 28, 2020. The study collected data from the Radimer/Cornell Hunger Scale and a food insecurity instrument. Analytical tools included chi-square and logistic regression models.\n\n\nFindings\nOf the 411 participating households, 54.3% were food-secure, while 45.7% experienced varying food insecurity. Among these, 29.9% reported mild hunger-associated food insecurity, 8.5% experienced individual food insecurity and 7.3% reported child hunger. The study identified predictors for food insecurity, including household income, as those with total income of < RM 2,300 had 13 times greater odds (odds ratio [OR] 13.8; confidence interval [CI] 5.9–32.1; p < 0.001) than those with income of RM 5,600, marital status as divorced (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.0–19.9; p-value = 0.05) or married (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.52–2.1) compared to those who are single. Self-employed respondents had three times greater odds of living in a household experiencing food insecurity (OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.6–7.7; p-value = 0.001) than those in the private sector (OR 1.48; 95% CI 0.85–2.61) or experiencing job loss (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.62–3.1) compared with those who reported being in full-time government employment.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study acknowledged limitations, such as not considering various dimensions of food insecurity, such as coping strategies, nutritional support, diet quality and well-being, due to the complexity of the issue.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study underscores the importance of targeted support for vulnerable groups and fostering collaborative efforts to address household food insecurity during crises like the MCOs.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe research offers insights into how to address household food insecurity and its impact on society.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIt identifies predictors, quantifies increased odds and emphasizes the necessity of targeted policies and collaborative approaches for fostering resilient recovery and promoting well-being in vulnerable populations.\n","PeriodicalId":509279,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Food Science","volume":"17 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food insecurity in Malaysia: assessing the impact of movement control order during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Dauda Goni, Abdulqudus Bola Aroyehun, Shariza Abdul Razak, W. Drammeh, Muhammad Adamu Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/nfs-08-2023-0172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to assess the household food insecurity in Malaysia during the initial phase of the movement control order (MCO) to provide insights into the prevalence and predictors of food insecurity in this context.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe research used an online cross-sectional survey between March 28 and April 28, 2020. The study collected data from the Radimer/Cornell Hunger Scale and a food insecurity instrument. Analytical tools included chi-square and logistic regression models.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nOf the 411 participating households, 54.3% were food-secure, while 45.7% experienced varying food insecurity. Among these, 29.9% reported mild hunger-associated food insecurity, 8.5% experienced individual food insecurity and 7.3% reported child hunger. The study identified predictors for food insecurity, including household income, as those with total income of < RM 2,300 had 13 times greater odds (odds ratio [OR] 13.8; confidence interval [CI] 5.9–32.1; p < 0.001) than those with income of RM 5,600, marital status as divorced (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.0–19.9; p-value = 0.05) or married (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.52–2.1) compared to those who are single. Self-employed respondents had three times greater odds of living in a household experiencing food insecurity (OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.6–7.7; p-value = 0.001) than those in the private sector (OR 1.48; 95% CI 0.85–2.61) or experiencing job loss (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.62–3.1) compared with those who reported being in full-time government employment.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study acknowledged limitations, such as not considering various dimensions of food insecurity, such as coping strategies, nutritional support, diet quality and well-being, due to the complexity of the issue.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe study underscores the importance of targeted support for vulnerable groups and fostering collaborative efforts to address household food insecurity during crises like the MCOs.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThe research offers insights into how to address household food insecurity and its impact on society.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nIt identifies predictors, quantifies increased odds and emphasizes the necessity of targeted policies and collaborative approaches for fostering resilient recovery and promoting well-being in vulnerable populations.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":509279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Food Science\",\"volume\":\"17 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-08-2023-0172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-08-2023-0172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究旨在评估马来西亚在人口流动管制令(MCO)实施初期的家庭粮食不安全状况,以便深入了解这种情况下粮食不安全的普遍性和预测因素。研究通过 Radimer/Cornell 饥饿量表和粮食不安全工具收集数据。在 411 个参与调查的家庭中,54.3% 的家庭粮食安全可靠,45.7% 的家庭存在不同程度的粮食不安全状况。其中,29.9%的家庭报告了与饥饿相关的轻度粮食不安全,8.5%的家庭经历了个人粮食不安全,7.3%的家庭报告了儿童饥饿。该研究确定了粮食不安全的预测因素,包括家庭收入,总收入低于 2,300 马币的受访者比收入为 5,600 马币的受访者的几率高 13 倍(几率比 [OR] 13.8;置信区间 [CI]5.9-32.1;p < 0.001),婚姻状况为离婚(OR 4.4;95% CI 1.0-19.9;p 值 = 0.05)或已婚(OR 1.04;95% CI 0.52-2.1)的受访者比单身受访者的几率高。与私营部门的受访者(OR 1.48;95% CI 0.85-2.61)或经历失业的受访者(OR 1.39;95% CI 0.62-3.1)相比,自营职业的受访者生活在粮食不安全家庭的几率(OR 3.58;95% CI 1.6-7.7;P 值 = 0.001)高出三倍。研究局限性/启示本研究承认存在局限性,如由于问题的复杂性,没有考虑粮食不安全的各个方面,如应对策略、营养支持、饮食质量和福祉。社会影响该研究为如何解决家庭粮食不安全问题及其对社会的影响提供了见解。原创性/价值它确定了预测因素,量化了增加的几率,并强调了有针对性的政策和合作方法对于促进脆弱人群的恢复能力和福祉的必要性。
Food insecurity in Malaysia: assessing the impact of movement control order during the COVID-19 pandemic
Purpose
This study aims to assess the household food insecurity in Malaysia during the initial phase of the movement control order (MCO) to provide insights into the prevalence and predictors of food insecurity in this context.
Design/methodology/approach
The research used an online cross-sectional survey between March 28 and April 28, 2020. The study collected data from the Radimer/Cornell Hunger Scale and a food insecurity instrument. Analytical tools included chi-square and logistic regression models.
Findings
Of the 411 participating households, 54.3% were food-secure, while 45.7% experienced varying food insecurity. Among these, 29.9% reported mild hunger-associated food insecurity, 8.5% experienced individual food insecurity and 7.3% reported child hunger. The study identified predictors for food insecurity, including household income, as those with total income of < RM 2,300 had 13 times greater odds (odds ratio [OR] 13.8; confidence interval [CI] 5.9–32.1; p < 0.001) than those with income of RM 5,600, marital status as divorced (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.0–19.9; p-value = 0.05) or married (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.52–2.1) compared to those who are single. Self-employed respondents had three times greater odds of living in a household experiencing food insecurity (OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.6–7.7; p-value = 0.001) than those in the private sector (OR 1.48; 95% CI 0.85–2.61) or experiencing job loss (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.62–3.1) compared with those who reported being in full-time government employment.
Research limitations/implications
This study acknowledged limitations, such as not considering various dimensions of food insecurity, such as coping strategies, nutritional support, diet quality and well-being, due to the complexity of the issue.
Practical implications
The study underscores the importance of targeted support for vulnerable groups and fostering collaborative efforts to address household food insecurity during crises like the MCOs.
Social implications
The research offers insights into how to address household food insecurity and its impact on society.
Originality/value
It identifies predictors, quantifies increased odds and emphasizes the necessity of targeted policies and collaborative approaches for fostering resilient recovery and promoting well-being in vulnerable populations.