{"title":"牧草分配频率和面积对比下奶牛的放牧行为","authors":"","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to compare grazing behavior of dairy cows with highly contrasting pasture allocation frequencies. The study ran from September 9, 2022, to December 2, 2022 (12 wk), during a time when daily pasture growth was expected to exceed daily herd intake. Three pasture allocation frequencies were compared, each with 11 spring-calving cows grazing a 4-ha farmlet. The allocations were high frequency rotational grazing (HFRG; 32.5 m<sup>2</sup>/cow per allocation and 4 allocations/d), rotational grazing with weekly allocations (7RG; 909 m<sup>2</sup>/cow per allocation and each allocated area continuously grazed over 7 d), and continuous grazing (CG; 1,818 m<sup>2</sup>/cow per allocation). Animal behavior was monitored using IceQube accelerometers (Peacock Technology) and CowManager ear tags (Agis Automatisering BV). Milk yield and composition were measured and pasture cover was estimated. Daily eating time was highest for CG animals, whereas lying time, lying bouts, and ruminating time were lowest, with no differences between HFRG and 7RG. There were no differences in fat- and protein-corrected milk yield between farmlets; however, estimated accumulated pasture yield was greater with more frequent allocations. Although milk production did not differ between treatment groups, this appeared to be achieved through greater eating times when allocated pasture less frequently, at the expense of time spent lying.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"5 5","pages":"Pages 436-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000280/pdfft?md5=39204f0431336c7fff7a88f16bf78658&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910224000280-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grazing behavior of dairy cows under contrasting pasture allocation frequencies and areas\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to compare grazing behavior of dairy cows with highly contrasting pasture allocation frequencies. The study ran from September 9, 2022, to December 2, 2022 (12 wk), during a time when daily pasture growth was expected to exceed daily herd intake. Three pasture allocation frequencies were compared, each with 11 spring-calving cows grazing a 4-ha farmlet. The allocations were high frequency rotational grazing (HFRG; 32.5 m<sup>2</sup>/cow per allocation and 4 allocations/d), rotational grazing with weekly allocations (7RG; 909 m<sup>2</sup>/cow per allocation and each allocated area continuously grazed over 7 d), and continuous grazing (CG; 1,818 m<sup>2</sup>/cow per allocation). Animal behavior was monitored using IceQube accelerometers (Peacock Technology) and CowManager ear tags (Agis Automatisering BV). Milk yield and composition were measured and pasture cover was estimated. Daily eating time was highest for CG animals, whereas lying time, lying bouts, and ruminating time were lowest, with no differences between HFRG and 7RG. There were no differences in fat- and protein-corrected milk yield between farmlets; however, estimated accumulated pasture yield was greater with more frequent allocations. Although milk production did not differ between treatment groups, this appeared to be achieved through greater eating times when allocated pasture less frequently, at the expense of time spent lying.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 436-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000280/pdfft?md5=39204f0431336c7fff7a88f16bf78658&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910224000280-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Grazing behavior of dairy cows under contrasting pasture allocation frequencies and areas
This study aimed to compare grazing behavior of dairy cows with highly contrasting pasture allocation frequencies. The study ran from September 9, 2022, to December 2, 2022 (12 wk), during a time when daily pasture growth was expected to exceed daily herd intake. Three pasture allocation frequencies were compared, each with 11 spring-calving cows grazing a 4-ha farmlet. The allocations were high frequency rotational grazing (HFRG; 32.5 m2/cow per allocation and 4 allocations/d), rotational grazing with weekly allocations (7RG; 909 m2/cow per allocation and each allocated area continuously grazed over 7 d), and continuous grazing (CG; 1,818 m2/cow per allocation). Animal behavior was monitored using IceQube accelerometers (Peacock Technology) and CowManager ear tags (Agis Automatisering BV). Milk yield and composition were measured and pasture cover was estimated. Daily eating time was highest for CG animals, whereas lying time, lying bouts, and ruminating time were lowest, with no differences between HFRG and 7RG. There were no differences in fat- and protein-corrected milk yield between farmlets; however, estimated accumulated pasture yield was greater with more frequent allocations. Although milk production did not differ between treatment groups, this appeared to be achieved through greater eating times when allocated pasture less frequently, at the expense of time spent lying.