处理患者对静止期炎症性肠病腹痛和肠易激综合征类似症状的报告:共同感知的作用

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY British Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1177/20494637241230807
Danielle Huisman, Felice Fernhout, Faye Moxham, Christine Norton, Kirsty Bannister, R. Moss‐Morris
{"title":"处理患者对静止期炎症性肠病腹痛和肠易激综合征类似症状的报告:共同感知的作用","authors":"Danielle Huisman, Felice Fernhout, Faye Moxham, Christine Norton, Kirsty Bannister, R. Moss‐Morris","doi":"10.1177/20494637241230807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often faced with distressing and confusing abdominal pain during remission. Some people respond adversely to healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) suggestions that this pain and related symptoms are due to secondary irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Exploring how HCPs view, manage, and explain pain during quiescent disease may provide insights into how communication can be improved to increase understanding and mitigate negative responses. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 IBD-nurses ( n = 4) and gastroenterologists ( n = 8) working in the United Kingdom or the Netherlands. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews. Findings suggest that HCPs pay relatively little attention to pain when there is no underlying pathology and prefer to concentrate on objectifiable causes of symptoms and treating disease activity ( Theme 1: Focus on disease activity, not pain and associated symptoms). Explanations of abdominal pain and IBS-like symptoms during remission were not standardised ( Theme 2: Idiosyncratic and uncertain explanations for pain during remission). Processes of shared decision-making were outlined and shared sensemaking was reported as a strategy to enhance acceptance of IBS explanations ( Theme 3: Shared decision making versus shared sensemaking). Future work should focus on establishing how pain during remission may be best defined, when to diagnose IBS in the context of IBD, and how to explain both to patients. The formulation of standardised explanations is recommended as they might help HCPs to adopt practices of shared sensemaking and shared decision-making. Explanations should be adaptable to specific symptom presentations and different health literacy levels.","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing patients’ reports of abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms during quiescent inflammatory bowel disease: a role for shared sensemaking\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Huisman, Felice Fernhout, Faye Moxham, Christine Norton, Kirsty Bannister, R. Moss‐Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20494637241230807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often faced with distressing and confusing abdominal pain during remission. Some people respond adversely to healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) suggestions that this pain and related symptoms are due to secondary irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Exploring how HCPs view, manage, and explain pain during quiescent disease may provide insights into how communication can be improved to increase understanding and mitigate negative responses. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 IBD-nurses ( n = 4) and gastroenterologists ( n = 8) working in the United Kingdom or the Netherlands. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews. Findings suggest that HCPs pay relatively little attention to pain when there is no underlying pathology and prefer to concentrate on objectifiable causes of symptoms and treating disease activity ( Theme 1: Focus on disease activity, not pain and associated symptoms). Explanations of abdominal pain and IBS-like symptoms during remission were not standardised ( Theme 2: Idiosyncratic and uncertain explanations for pain during remission). Processes of shared decision-making were outlined and shared sensemaking was reported as a strategy to enhance acceptance of IBS explanations ( Theme 3: Shared decision making versus shared sensemaking). Future work should focus on establishing how pain during remission may be best defined, when to diagnose IBS in the context of IBD, and how to explain both to patients. The formulation of standardised explanations is recommended as they might help HCPs to adopt practices of shared sensemaking and shared decision-making. Explanations should be adaptable to specific symptom presentations and different health literacy levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241230807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241230807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

炎症性肠病(IBD)患者在缓解期经常会遇到令人痛苦和困惑的腹痛。有些人对医护人员(HCPs)关于这种疼痛和相关症状是由继发性肠易激综合征(IBS)引起的建议反应消极。探究医护人员如何看待、处理和解释疾病静止期的疼痛,可以帮助我们了解如何改善沟通以增加理解和减轻负面反应。我们对在英国或荷兰工作的 12 名 IBD 护士(4 人)和胃肠病专家(8 人)进行了深入的半结构式访谈。访谈分析采用了反思性主题分析法。研究结果表明,在没有潜在病理的情况下,保健医生对疼痛的关注相对较少,他们更愿意将注意力集中在症状的客观原因和疾病活动的治疗上(主题 1:关注疾病活动,而非疼痛和相关症状)。对缓解期腹痛和类似肠易激综合征症状的解释并不规范(主题 2:对缓解期疼痛的解释具有随意性和不确定性)。研究人员概述了共同决策的过程,并报告了共同感知决策是提高对 IBS 解释接受度的一种策略(主题 3:共同决策与共同感知决策)。今后的工作应侧重于确定如何最好地定义缓解期疼痛,何时在 IBD 的背景下诊断 IBS,以及如何向患者解释这两种情况。建议制定标准化的解释,因为它们可能有助于保健医生采用共同感知和共同决策的做法。解释应适应特定的症状表现和不同的健康知识水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing patients’ reports of abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms during quiescent inflammatory bowel disease: a role for shared sensemaking
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often faced with distressing and confusing abdominal pain during remission. Some people respond adversely to healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) suggestions that this pain and related symptoms are due to secondary irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Exploring how HCPs view, manage, and explain pain during quiescent disease may provide insights into how communication can be improved to increase understanding and mitigate negative responses. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 IBD-nurses ( n = 4) and gastroenterologists ( n = 8) working in the United Kingdom or the Netherlands. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews. Findings suggest that HCPs pay relatively little attention to pain when there is no underlying pathology and prefer to concentrate on objectifiable causes of symptoms and treating disease activity ( Theme 1: Focus on disease activity, not pain and associated symptoms). Explanations of abdominal pain and IBS-like symptoms during remission were not standardised ( Theme 2: Idiosyncratic and uncertain explanations for pain during remission). Processes of shared decision-making were outlined and shared sensemaking was reported as a strategy to enhance acceptance of IBS explanations ( Theme 3: Shared decision making versus shared sensemaking). Future work should focus on establishing how pain during remission may be best defined, when to diagnose IBS in the context of IBD, and how to explain both to patients. The formulation of standardised explanations is recommended as they might help HCPs to adopt practices of shared sensemaking and shared decision-making. Explanations should be adaptable to specific symptom presentations and different health literacy levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
期刊最新文献
What influences post-operative opioid requirements for tibial fractures? Botulinum toxin: Should we reconsider its place in the treatment of neuropathic pain? Experience of compassion-based practice in mindfulness for health for individuals with persistent pain. Prehabilitation: The underutilised weapon for chronic pain management. The interaction between psychological factors and conditioned pain modulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1