{"title":"迪米特里-坎特米尔的《圣洁的科学--独立的意象》(1700 年)中的时间","authors":"Vlad Alexandrescu","doi":"10.33993/tr.2023.3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educated in Constantinople in the last decades of the 17th century, Dimitrie Cantemir (1673–\n1723) encountered, on the one hand, the Paduan Aristotelianism transmitted by the Greek philo sophical teachers trained in Venice and Padua, and, on the other, was inspired by a Platonic, \nNeoplatonic and Pseudo-Dionysian tradition, still alive in Eastern Christian thought. Written \nafter a thorough study of the work of J. B. van Helmont, his treatise on time echoes these mul tiple roots and proposes a conception of time which affirms the non-categoriality and neutrality of \nthe notion of time, its continuous, uniform, immovable, non-successive, immiscible, immutable \ncharacter, distributive in the singular time of each creature (according to the model of Platonic \nparticipation), its participation in eternity, the emanation of eternity from the divine Intellect, and \nthe precedence of time over Creation","PeriodicalId":23235,"journal":{"name":"Transylvanian Review","volume":"38 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time in Dimitrie Cantemir’s \\nSacro-sanctae Scientiae \\nIndepingibilis Imago (1700)\",\"authors\":\"Vlad Alexandrescu\",\"doi\":\"10.33993/tr.2023.3.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Educated in Constantinople in the last decades of the 17th century, Dimitrie Cantemir (1673–\\n1723) encountered, on the one hand, the Paduan Aristotelianism transmitted by the Greek philo sophical teachers trained in Venice and Padua, and, on the other, was inspired by a Platonic, \\nNeoplatonic and Pseudo-Dionysian tradition, still alive in Eastern Christian thought. Written \\nafter a thorough study of the work of J. B. van Helmont, his treatise on time echoes these mul tiple roots and proposes a conception of time which affirms the non-categoriality and neutrality of \\nthe notion of time, its continuous, uniform, immovable, non-successive, immiscible, immutable \\ncharacter, distributive in the singular time of each creature (according to the model of Platonic \\nparticipation), its participation in eternity, the emanation of eternity from the divine Intellect, and \\nthe precedence of time over Creation\",\"PeriodicalId\":23235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transylvanian Review\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transylvanian Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33993/tr.2023.3.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transylvanian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33993/tr.2023.3.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
迪米特里-坎特米尔(1673-1723 年)于 17 世纪最后几十年在君士坦丁堡接受教育,一方面接触到由威尼斯和帕多瓦培养的希腊哲学教师所传播的帕多瓦亚里士多德主义,另一方面受到柏拉图主义、新柏拉图主义和伪狄奥尼派传统的启发,这些传统在东方基督教思想中依然存在。在对 J. B. van Helmont 的著作进行深入研究后,他撰写了这篇论文。van Helmont 的著作后撰写的,他的时间论呼应了这些根源,并提出了一种时间概念,肯定了时间概念的非分类性和中立性、时间的连续性、统一性、不可移动性、不可继承性、不可混溶性、不可改变性、在每个生物的单个时间中的分配性(根据柏拉图式的参与模式)、时间在永恒中的参与性、永恒从神圣的智慧中产生,以及时间优先于创造
Time in Dimitrie Cantemir’s
Sacro-sanctae Scientiae
Indepingibilis Imago (1700)
Educated in Constantinople in the last decades of the 17th century, Dimitrie Cantemir (1673–
1723) encountered, on the one hand, the Paduan Aristotelianism transmitted by the Greek philo sophical teachers trained in Venice and Padua, and, on the other, was inspired by a Platonic,
Neoplatonic and Pseudo-Dionysian tradition, still alive in Eastern Christian thought. Written
after a thorough study of the work of J. B. van Helmont, his treatise on time echoes these mul tiple roots and proposes a conception of time which affirms the non-categoriality and neutrality of
the notion of time, its continuous, uniform, immovable, non-successive, immiscible, immutable
character, distributive in the singular time of each creature (according to the model of Platonic
participation), its participation in eternity, the emanation of eternity from the divine Intellect, and
the precedence of time over Creation
期刊介绍:
Scientific periodical of the Center for Transylvanian Studies, the Transylvanian Review quarterly is published exclusively in widely spoken languages (English, French, German, Italian) and regularly sent to nearly 200 Romanian and foreign libraries. Transylvanian Review is a peer reviewed journal, with evaluators selected from reputable specialists in their field. Transylvanian Review features studies, articles, debates and book reviews pertaining to various cultural fields, with direct reference to Transylvania, seen as a multicultural space of ethnic, linguistic, religious contacts.