{"title":"古尔根-坎吉扬的剧本《桥上:多年以后》的传记和社会政治背景","authors":"Karen Manucharyan","doi":"10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v4i63.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, we have examined Gurgen Khanjyan's play \"On the Bridge: Years Later\" in the light of biographical and socio-political circumstances. \n The play is based on the biographical events of the author. The episodes from the past of the main character George directly reflect a large period of G. Khanjyan's biography. In the center of the action is the character type of a middle-aged artist, internally divided, isolated, prone to alcoholism and irregular sex life, which generally corresponds to Gurgen Khanjyan. \nTo examine the connection between biography and literature correctly, we have referred to the critical significance of the biographical method, showing its advantages and disadvantages. To avoid a one-sided examination, we also referred to the three \"totalities\" identified by the cultural-historical method founder, Hippolyte Ten, in which the artistic work is located (co-authorship of the author's works, dominant currents and directions of the time, general nature of society). \n Based on these methods, we tried to examine the play in different chains. With the help of the interview conducted with the author, we compiled the early period of his biography, paying special attention to the episode of the suicide attempt. The latter is the core of the play, around which other events are woven. We have also referred to the socio-political circumstances of the country, because the general situation of the newly independent Armenia corresponded to the image of the author who reached the edge of the bridge. We examined the opinions expressed by the main character about painting as the manifestation of Gurgen Khanjyan's literary understanding, partially referring to the co-author of his work. \n We came to the conclusion that the biographical facts were generalized as much as possible in the play and became windows of the aesthetic perception of the world.","PeriodicalId":516798,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES","volume":"34 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GURGEN KHANJYAN'S PLAY \\\"ON THE BRIDGE: YEARS LATER\\\" IN THE LIGHT OF BIOGRAPHICAL AND SOCIO-POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES\",\"authors\":\"Karen Manucharyan\",\"doi\":\"10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v4i63.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article, we have examined Gurgen Khanjyan's play \\\"On the Bridge: Years Later\\\" in the light of biographical and socio-political circumstances. \\n The play is based on the biographical events of the author. The episodes from the past of the main character George directly reflect a large period of G. Khanjyan's biography. In the center of the action is the character type of a middle-aged artist, internally divided, isolated, prone to alcoholism and irregular sex life, which generally corresponds to Gurgen Khanjyan. \\nTo examine the connection between biography and literature correctly, we have referred to the critical significance of the biographical method, showing its advantages and disadvantages. To avoid a one-sided examination, we also referred to the three \\\"totalities\\\" identified by the cultural-historical method founder, Hippolyte Ten, in which the artistic work is located (co-authorship of the author's works, dominant currents and directions of the time, general nature of society). \\n Based on these methods, we tried to examine the play in different chains. With the help of the interview conducted with the author, we compiled the early period of his biography, paying special attention to the episode of the suicide attempt. The latter is the core of the play, around which other events are woven. We have also referred to the socio-political circumstances of the country, because the general situation of the newly independent Armenia corresponded to the image of the author who reached the edge of the bridge. We examined the opinions expressed by the main character about painting as the manifestation of Gurgen Khanjyan's literary understanding, partially referring to the co-author of his work. \\n We came to the conclusion that the biographical facts were generalized as much as possible in the play and became windows of the aesthetic perception of the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"34 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v4i63.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24234/journalforarmenianstudies.v4i63.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇文章中,我们根据古尔根-汗吉扬的传记和社会政治环境,对他的剧本《桥上:多年以后》。 该剧根据作者的生平事迹改编。主人公乔治的往事直接反映了 G. 汗吉扬的一大段传记。剧中的中心人物是一位中年艺术家,他内心分裂、孤僻、酗酒、性生活不规律,这与古尔根-汗吉扬的性格特征基本吻合。为了正确研究传记与文学之间的联系,我们提到了传记方法的批判意义,指出了它的优点和缺点。为了避免片面的研究,我们还参考了文化历史方法创始人希波吕特-滕所确定的艺术作品所处的三个 "总体"(作者作品的共同作者、时代的主流和方向、社会的总体性质)。 基于这些方法,我们试图从不同的链条上对该剧进行研究。借助对作者的访谈,我们梳理了他早期的传记,特别关注了自杀未遂的情节。后者是该剧的核心,其他事件都围绕着它展开。我们还参考了国家的社会政治环境,因为新独立的亚美尼亚的总体情况与作者在桥边的形象相吻合。我们研究了主人公对绘画所表达的观点,这体现了古尔根-汗吉扬对文学的理解,其中部分提到了其作品的合著者。 我们得出的结论是,剧中尽可能地概括了传记事实,使其成为世界美学感知的窗口。
GURGEN KHANJYAN'S PLAY "ON THE BRIDGE: YEARS LATER" IN THE LIGHT OF BIOGRAPHICAL AND SOCIO-POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES
In the article, we have examined Gurgen Khanjyan's play "On the Bridge: Years Later" in the light of biographical and socio-political circumstances.
The play is based on the biographical events of the author. The episodes from the past of the main character George directly reflect a large period of G. Khanjyan's biography. In the center of the action is the character type of a middle-aged artist, internally divided, isolated, prone to alcoholism and irregular sex life, which generally corresponds to Gurgen Khanjyan.
To examine the connection between biography and literature correctly, we have referred to the critical significance of the biographical method, showing its advantages and disadvantages. To avoid a one-sided examination, we also referred to the three "totalities" identified by the cultural-historical method founder, Hippolyte Ten, in which the artistic work is located (co-authorship of the author's works, dominant currents and directions of the time, general nature of society).
Based on these methods, we tried to examine the play in different chains. With the help of the interview conducted with the author, we compiled the early period of his biography, paying special attention to the episode of the suicide attempt. The latter is the core of the play, around which other events are woven. We have also referred to the socio-political circumstances of the country, because the general situation of the newly independent Armenia corresponded to the image of the author who reached the edge of the bridge. We examined the opinions expressed by the main character about painting as the manifestation of Gurgen Khanjyan's literary understanding, partially referring to the co-author of his work.
We came to the conclusion that the biographical facts were generalized as much as possible in the play and became windows of the aesthetic perception of the world.