制定肿瘤心理远程保健指南:改良德尔菲共识研究

Claire Cooper, J. Gilchrist, L. Beatty, L. Kirsten, Louise Sharpe, Nienke Zomerdijk, Maree Grier, Jane Turner, Kim Hobbs, H. Haydon, Haryana Dhillon, B. Kelly, Joanne Shaw
{"title":"制定肿瘤心理远程保健指南:改良德尔菲共识研究","authors":"Claire Cooper, J. Gilchrist, L. Beatty, L. Kirsten, Louise Sharpe, Nienke Zomerdijk, Maree Grier, Jane Turner, Kim Hobbs, H. Haydon, Haryana Dhillon, B. Kelly, Joanne Shaw","doi":"10.1097/or9.0000000000000123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n In response to COVID-19, psycho-oncology clinicians moved to a model of telephone and videoconference treatment in Australia. The Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG) identified a paucity of evidence available to guide adaptation of therapy for remote delivery. This research aimed to develop consensus for evidence-based guidelines on ways to adapt psychological therapies in psycho-oncology for remote delivery.\n \n \n \n A national expert advisory group (N = 11) was convened consisting of psycho-oncology clinicians and clinical researchers. An iterative codesign methodology was used to draft psycho-oncology telehealth guidelines. Australian psycho-oncology clinicians participated in a Delphi consensus process to guide the content included in the guidelines. Content was presented under six domains: (i) screening and outcome measures, (ii) formulation, (iii) safety considerations, (iv) resource adaptation, (v) adaptations to therapy, and (vi) example case studies. Participants rated items based on importance, therapeutic appropriateness, and/or usefulness. Consensus was defined as >80% agreement.\n \n \n \n Thirty-two psycho-oncology clinicians with telehealth experience participated in three Delphi rounds. Agreement was reached on (i) the importance of including screening and outcome measures (90%) and items (n = 5) related to how best to facilitate this; (ii) the importance of addressing provision of a formulation (100%), although only 2/6 strategies presented to facilitate formulation reached consensus; (iii) the appropriateness of proposed risk assessment and management strategies (84%); (iv) therapeutic appropriateness of simplifying resources (100%), including 3/5 visual optimization strategies; and (v) common behavioral components of therapy (n=5).\n \n \n \n Providing guidance to psycho-oncology clinicians for integrating telehealth into routine clinical practice must go beyond logistical considerations. These consensus-based guidelines provide support to clinicians for adaptation of psycho-oncology therapy to telehealth and will ensure evidence-based practice.\n","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of psycho-oncology telehealth guidelines: a modified Delphi consensus study\",\"authors\":\"Claire Cooper, J. Gilchrist, L. Beatty, L. Kirsten, Louise Sharpe, Nienke Zomerdijk, Maree Grier, Jane Turner, Kim Hobbs, H. Haydon, Haryana Dhillon, B. Kelly, Joanne Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/or9.0000000000000123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n In response to COVID-19, psycho-oncology clinicians moved to a model of telephone and videoconference treatment in Australia. The Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG) identified a paucity of evidence available to guide adaptation of therapy for remote delivery. This research aimed to develop consensus for evidence-based guidelines on ways to adapt psychological therapies in psycho-oncology for remote delivery.\\n \\n \\n \\n A national expert advisory group (N = 11) was convened consisting of psycho-oncology clinicians and clinical researchers. An iterative codesign methodology was used to draft psycho-oncology telehealth guidelines. Australian psycho-oncology clinicians participated in a Delphi consensus process to guide the content included in the guidelines. Content was presented under six domains: (i) screening and outcome measures, (ii) formulation, (iii) safety considerations, (iv) resource adaptation, (v) adaptations to therapy, and (vi) example case studies. Participants rated items based on importance, therapeutic appropriateness, and/or usefulness. Consensus was defined as >80% agreement.\\n \\n \\n \\n Thirty-two psycho-oncology clinicians with telehealth experience participated in three Delphi rounds. Agreement was reached on (i) the importance of including screening and outcome measures (90%) and items (n = 5) related to how best to facilitate this; (ii) the importance of addressing provision of a formulation (100%), although only 2/6 strategies presented to facilitate formulation reached consensus; (iii) the appropriateness of proposed risk assessment and management strategies (84%); (iv) therapeutic appropriateness of simplifying resources (100%), including 3/5 visual optimization strategies; and (v) common behavioral components of therapy (n=5).\\n \\n \\n \\n Providing guidance to psycho-oncology clinicians for integrating telehealth into routine clinical practice must go beyond logistical considerations. These consensus-based guidelines provide support to clinicians for adaptation of psycho-oncology therapy to telehealth and will ensure evidence-based practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":73915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/or9.0000000000000123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/or9.0000000000000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为对 COVID-19 的回应,澳大利亚的肿瘤心理临床医生开始采用电话和视频会议治疗模式。肿瘤心理合作研究小组(PoCoG)发现,用于指导远程治疗调整的证据十分匮乏。这项研究旨在就如何调整肿瘤心理疗法以适应远程治疗的循证指南达成共识。 我们召集了一个由肿瘤心理临床医生和临床研究人员组成的全国专家顾问小组(N = 11)。采用迭代编码设计方法起草肿瘤心理远程医疗指南。澳大利亚肿瘤心理临床医生参与了德尔菲共识过程,以指导指南中的内容。指南内容分为六个方面:(i) 筛选和结果测量;(ii) 制定;(iii) 安全考虑;(iv) 资源调整;(v) 治疗调整;(vi) 案例研究。参与者根据重要性、治疗适宜性和/或实用性对项目进行评分。一致同意率>80%即为达成共识。 32 名具有远程医疗经验的肿瘤心理临床医生参加了三轮德尔菲讨论。在以下方面达成了一致意见:(i) 包括筛查和结果测量的重要性(90%)以及与如何最好地促进筛查和结果测量相关的项目(n=5);(ii) 提供配方的重要性(100%),尽管只有 2/6 个促进配方的策略达成了共识;(iii) 建议的风险评估和管理策略的适当性(84%);(iv) 简化资源的治疗适当性(100%),包括 3/5 个可视化优化策略;以及 (v) 治疗的常见行为组成部分(n=5)。 为肿瘤心理临床医生提供将远程医疗纳入常规临床实践的指导必须超越后勤方面的考虑。这些基于共识的指南为临床医生将肿瘤心理治疗应用于远程医疗提供了支持,并将确保循证实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of psycho-oncology telehealth guidelines: a modified Delphi consensus study
In response to COVID-19, psycho-oncology clinicians moved to a model of telephone and videoconference treatment in Australia. The Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG) identified a paucity of evidence available to guide adaptation of therapy for remote delivery. This research aimed to develop consensus for evidence-based guidelines on ways to adapt psychological therapies in psycho-oncology for remote delivery. A national expert advisory group (N = 11) was convened consisting of psycho-oncology clinicians and clinical researchers. An iterative codesign methodology was used to draft psycho-oncology telehealth guidelines. Australian psycho-oncology clinicians participated in a Delphi consensus process to guide the content included in the guidelines. Content was presented under six domains: (i) screening and outcome measures, (ii) formulation, (iii) safety considerations, (iv) resource adaptation, (v) adaptations to therapy, and (vi) example case studies. Participants rated items based on importance, therapeutic appropriateness, and/or usefulness. Consensus was defined as >80% agreement. Thirty-two psycho-oncology clinicians with telehealth experience participated in three Delphi rounds. Agreement was reached on (i) the importance of including screening and outcome measures (90%) and items (n = 5) related to how best to facilitate this; (ii) the importance of addressing provision of a formulation (100%), although only 2/6 strategies presented to facilitate formulation reached consensus; (iii) the appropriateness of proposed risk assessment and management strategies (84%); (iv) therapeutic appropriateness of simplifying resources (100%), including 3/5 visual optimization strategies; and (v) common behavioral components of therapy (n=5). Providing guidance to psycho-oncology clinicians for integrating telehealth into routine clinical practice must go beyond logistical considerations. These consensus-based guidelines provide support to clinicians for adaptation of psycho-oncology therapy to telehealth and will ensure evidence-based practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1