利用特征提取分析脑电信号以检测癫痫发作

SciEnggJ Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.54645/202417supcqp-72
Ravikumar Kandagatla, V. J. Naidu, P.S. Sreenivasa Reddy, Veera Kavya Pandilla, Marriwada Joshitha, Chanamala Rakesh
{"title":"利用特征提取分析脑电信号以检测癫痫发作","authors":"Ravikumar Kandagatla, V. J. Naidu, P.S. Sreenivasa Reddy, Veera Kavya Pandilla, Marriwada Joshitha, Chanamala Rakesh","doi":"10.54645/202417supcqp-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electroencephalogram, which tracks electrical signals in the central nervous system, has been extensively used to diagnose epilepsy, which represents a particular sort of brain abnormality. However, developing seizure classification techniques with significantly better precision and reduced complexity remains challenging. The Epileptic Seizure Recognition dataset, which is publicly accessible in the Kaagle and in the machine learning repository, was used to identify seizures. To identify the seizure, we compared six classification methods to determine which one had the highest success rate. The dataset is subsequently divided, trained, and tested in order to categorize it further using six machine learning algorithms: Stochastic Gradient Descent, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm, Extra Tree Classifier and Decision Tree. When contrasted with alternative techniques, Extra Trees Classifier possesses the highest accuracy results. The algorithm attained a 96 percent success rate.","PeriodicalId":518923,"journal":{"name":"SciEnggJ","volume":"134 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of EEG signals for the detection of epileptic seizures using feature extraction\",\"authors\":\"Ravikumar Kandagatla, V. J. Naidu, P.S. Sreenivasa Reddy, Veera Kavya Pandilla, Marriwada Joshitha, Chanamala Rakesh\",\"doi\":\"10.54645/202417supcqp-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The electroencephalogram, which tracks electrical signals in the central nervous system, has been extensively used to diagnose epilepsy, which represents a particular sort of brain abnormality. However, developing seizure classification techniques with significantly better precision and reduced complexity remains challenging. The Epileptic Seizure Recognition dataset, which is publicly accessible in the Kaagle and in the machine learning repository, was used to identify seizures. To identify the seizure, we compared six classification methods to determine which one had the highest success rate. The dataset is subsequently divided, trained, and tested in order to categorize it further using six machine learning algorithms: Stochastic Gradient Descent, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm, Extra Tree Classifier and Decision Tree. When contrasted with alternative techniques, Extra Trees Classifier possesses the highest accuracy results. The algorithm attained a 96 percent success rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SciEnggJ\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SciEnggJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54645/202417supcqp-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SciEnggJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54645/202417supcqp-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑电图可跟踪中枢神经系统中的电信号,已被广泛用于诊断癫痫,癫痫是一种特殊的脑部异常。然而,开发具有更高精度和更低复杂度的癫痫发作分类技术仍具有挑战性。癫痫发作识别数据集用于识别癫痫发作,该数据集可在 Kaagle 和机器学习资料库中公开访问。为了识别癫痫发作,我们比较了六种分类方法,以确定哪种方法的成功率最高。随后对数据集进行划分、训练和测试,以便使用六种机器学习算法进一步分类:随机梯度下降、逻辑回归、奈夫贝叶斯、K-近邻算法、额外树分类器和决策树。与其他技术相比,额外树分类器的准确率最高。该算法的成功率高达 96%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of EEG signals for the detection of epileptic seizures using feature extraction
The electroencephalogram, which tracks electrical signals in the central nervous system, has been extensively used to diagnose epilepsy, which represents a particular sort of brain abnormality. However, developing seizure classification techniques with significantly better precision and reduced complexity remains challenging. The Epileptic Seizure Recognition dataset, which is publicly accessible in the Kaagle and in the machine learning repository, was used to identify seizures. To identify the seizure, we compared six classification methods to determine which one had the highest success rate. The dataset is subsequently divided, trained, and tested in order to categorize it further using six machine learning algorithms: Stochastic Gradient Descent, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm, Extra Tree Classifier and Decision Tree. When contrasted with alternative techniques, Extra Trees Classifier possesses the highest accuracy results. The algorithm attained a 96 percent success rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the organ-system integrated curriculum on the research productivity of a Philippine government medical school: An ARIMA-based bibliometric analysis Intradialytic massage for leg cramps among hemodialysis patients: A single-center, randomized crossover trial Diversity and novelty of venom peptides from Conus (Asprella) rolani revealed by analysis of its venom duct transcriptome Predictors of interdependent happiness among health science students during the COVID-19 pandemic Heated tobacco products: Potentials of harm reduction, improvement of indoor air quality and the need for further studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1