非正式练习与仁爱和同情训练的结果有关吗?事后和每日日记评估的证据

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104537
Qiang Xie , Kevin M. Riordan , Scott A. Baldwin , Otto Simonsson , Matthew J. Hirshberg , Cortland J. Dahl , Inbal Nahum-Shani , Richard J. Davidson , Simon B. Goldberg
{"title":"非正式练习与仁爱和同情训练的结果有关吗?事后和每日日记评估的证据","authors":"Qiang Xie ,&nbsp;Kevin M. Riordan ,&nbsp;Scott A. Baldwin ,&nbsp;Otto Simonsson ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Hirshberg ,&nbsp;Cortland J. Dahl ,&nbsp;Inbal Nahum-Shani ,&nbsp;Richard J. Davidson ,&nbsp;Simon B. Goldberg","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated whether informal meditation practice (i.e., self-reported application of meditative techniques outside a period of formal meditation) was associated with outcomes in smartphone-based loving-kindness and compassion training. Meditation-naïve participants (<em>n</em> = 351) with clinically elevated symptoms completed measures of psychological distress, loneliness, empathy, and prosociality at baseline and following a two-week intervention. Informal practice, psychological distress, and loneliness were also assessed daily. Steeper increases in informal practice had small associations with pre-post improvements in distress (<em>r</em> = −.18, <em>p</em> = .008) and loneliness (<em>r</em> = −.19, <em>p</em> = .009) but not empathy or prosociality. Using a currently recommended approach for establishing cross-lagged effects in longitudinal data (latent curve model with structured residuals), higher current-day informal practice was associated with decreased next-day distress with a very small effect size (<em>β</em>s = −.06 to −.04, <em>p</em> = .018) but not decreased next-day loneliness. No cross-lagged associations emerged from distress or loneliness to informal practice. Findings suggest that further investigation into a potential causal role of informal practice is warranted. Future studies experimentally manipulating informal practice are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104537"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is informal practice associated with outcomes in loving-kindness and compassion training? Evidence from pre-post and daily diary assessments\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Xie ,&nbsp;Kevin M. Riordan ,&nbsp;Scott A. Baldwin ,&nbsp;Otto Simonsson ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Hirshberg ,&nbsp;Cortland J. Dahl ,&nbsp;Inbal Nahum-Shani ,&nbsp;Richard J. Davidson ,&nbsp;Simon B. Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigated whether informal meditation practice (i.e., self-reported application of meditative techniques outside a period of formal meditation) was associated with outcomes in smartphone-based loving-kindness and compassion training. Meditation-naïve participants (<em>n</em> = 351) with clinically elevated symptoms completed measures of psychological distress, loneliness, empathy, and prosociality at baseline and following a two-week intervention. Informal practice, psychological distress, and loneliness were also assessed daily. Steeper increases in informal practice had small associations with pre-post improvements in distress (<em>r</em> = −.18, <em>p</em> = .008) and loneliness (<em>r</em> = −.19, <em>p</em> = .009) but not empathy or prosociality. Using a currently recommended approach for establishing cross-lagged effects in longitudinal data (latent curve model with structured residuals), higher current-day informal practice was associated with decreased next-day distress with a very small effect size (<em>β</em>s = −.06 to −.04, <em>p</em> = .018) but not decreased next-day loneliness. No cross-lagged associations emerged from distress or loneliness to informal practice. Findings suggest that further investigation into a potential causal role of informal practice is warranted. Future studies experimentally manipulating informal practice are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"177 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000640\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了非正式冥想练习(即在正式冥想之外自我报告的冥想技巧应用)是否与基于智能手机的爱心和同情心训练的结果有关。未参加过冥想的临床症状升高者(351 人)在基线和两周干预后完成了心理压力、孤独感、同情心和亲社会性的测量。每天还对非正式练习、心理困扰和孤独感进行评估。非正式实践的逐步增加与干预前的心理困扰(r = -.18,p = .008)和孤独感(r = -.19,p = .009)改善有微小关联,但与移情或亲社会性无关。使用目前推荐的纵向数据交叉滞后效应(具有结构化残差的潜在曲线模型),当日较高的非正式实践与次日较低的苦恼相关,但影响很小(βs = -.06 至 -.04, p = .018),而与次日较低的孤独感无关。苦恼或孤独感与非正式实践之间没有交叉滞后关系。研究结果表明,有必要进一步研究非正式实践的潜在因果作用。未来的研究需要通过实验来操纵非正式实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is informal practice associated with outcomes in loving-kindness and compassion training? Evidence from pre-post and daily diary assessments

We investigated whether informal meditation practice (i.e., self-reported application of meditative techniques outside a period of formal meditation) was associated with outcomes in smartphone-based loving-kindness and compassion training. Meditation-naïve participants (n = 351) with clinically elevated symptoms completed measures of psychological distress, loneliness, empathy, and prosociality at baseline and following a two-week intervention. Informal practice, psychological distress, and loneliness were also assessed daily. Steeper increases in informal practice had small associations with pre-post improvements in distress (r = −.18, p = .008) and loneliness (r = −.19, p = .009) but not empathy or prosociality. Using a currently recommended approach for establishing cross-lagged effects in longitudinal data (latent curve model with structured residuals), higher current-day informal practice was associated with decreased next-day distress with a very small effect size (βs = −.06 to −.04, p = .018) but not decreased next-day loneliness. No cross-lagged associations emerged from distress or loneliness to informal practice. Findings suggest that further investigation into a potential causal role of informal practice is warranted. Future studies experimentally manipulating informal practice are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
期刊最新文献
Sleep bad, feel bad: Unpacking the role of exercise and socializing Intolerance of uncertainty enhances adolescent fear generalization in both perceptual-based and category-based tasks: fNIRS studies Positive cognitive reappraisal flexibility is associated with lower levels of perceived stress The future of the eating disorder field: Inclusive, aware of systems, and personalized Active contextualization reduces traumatic memory intrusions via memory integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1