Shu Guo , Ka Ming Li , Min Liu , Weining Wang , Changhua Fan , Xingliang Xu , Xiaoyong Cui
{"title":"由种内相互作用形成的植物根系性状变异具有物种特异性","authors":"Shu Guo , Ka Ming Li , Min Liu , Weining Wang , Changhua Fan , Xingliang Xu , Xiaoyong Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intraspecific plant interactions are crucial in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in artificially controlled ecosystems. Understanding plant root development can facilitate the manipulation of root traits to enhance the productivity and sustainability of agricultural and pastoral ecosystems. To date, most studies on interactions between the plants have focused on environmental factors or individual species; however, the lack of cross-species comparative analyses has resulted in a significant disparity in findings. In this study, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using five dominant species from alpine grasslands, including three legume species (<em>Thermopsis lanceolata, Oxytropis ochrocephala</em>, and <em>Tibetia himalaica</em>) and two grass species (<em>Elymus nutans</em> and <em>Stipa aliena</em>). Using single-plant cultivation as the control, we investigated the overall changes in plant biomass and root traits when two conspecific plants are grown together (intraspecifically). Simultaneously, we explored the differences in roots traits between the interaction and no-interaction zones. The results showed that, firstly, there was no significant difference in biomass and root traits of different zones when single-planted. But the impact of intraspecific interactions on neighboring plants exhibited significant species-specific. In terms of biomass and root traits (except for forks), <em>E. nutans</em>, <em>T. lanceolata</em> and <em>T. himalaica</em> responded significantly negatively to their neighbors. Whereas <em>S. aliena</em> and <em>O. ochrocephala</em> showed no significant changes and even positive responses. The overall trend of changes in the root zones, whether interactive or non-interactive, was consistent, either increasing or decreasing simultaneously, albeit to different extents. For instance, the difference between the interaction and no-interaction zones of <em>T. lanceolata</em> and <em>O. ochrocephala</em> was substantial, leading to allometric growth. Finally, our results showed poor correlations of physicochemical and nutrient factors with root traits in four of the five species, all except for <em>E. nutans</em>. Altogether, our findings confirmed that root trait variations resulting from intraspecific plant interactions are species-specific. These findings underscored the importance of species-specific in intraspecific plant interactions involving biological interactions among plants, which should be considered in future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in plant root traits shaped by intraspecific interactions are species-specific\",\"authors\":\"Shu Guo , Ka Ming Li , Min Liu , Weining Wang , Changhua Fan , Xingliang Xu , Xiaoyong Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intraspecific plant interactions are crucial in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in artificially controlled ecosystems. Understanding plant root development can facilitate the manipulation of root traits to enhance the productivity and sustainability of agricultural and pastoral ecosystems. To date, most studies on interactions between the plants have focused on environmental factors or individual species; however, the lack of cross-species comparative analyses has resulted in a significant disparity in findings. In this study, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using five dominant species from alpine grasslands, including three legume species (<em>Thermopsis lanceolata, Oxytropis ochrocephala</em>, and <em>Tibetia himalaica</em>) and two grass species (<em>Elymus nutans</em> and <em>Stipa aliena</em>). Using single-plant cultivation as the control, we investigated the overall changes in plant biomass and root traits when two conspecific plants are grown together (intraspecifically). Simultaneously, we explored the differences in roots traits between the interaction and no-interaction zones. The results showed that, firstly, there was no significant difference in biomass and root traits of different zones when single-planted. But the impact of intraspecific interactions on neighboring plants exhibited significant species-specific. In terms of biomass and root traits (except for forks), <em>E. nutans</em>, <em>T. lanceolata</em> and <em>T. himalaica</em> responded significantly negatively to their neighbors. Whereas <em>S. aliena</em> and <em>O. ochrocephala</em> showed no significant changes and even positive responses. The overall trend of changes in the root zones, whether interactive or non-interactive, was consistent, either increasing or decreasing simultaneously, albeit to different extents. For instance, the difference between the interaction and no-interaction zones of <em>T. lanceolata</em> and <em>O. ochrocephala</em> was substantial, leading to allometric growth. Finally, our results showed poor correlations of physicochemical and nutrient factors with root traits in four of the five species, all except for <em>E. nutans</em>. Altogether, our findings confirmed that root trait variations resulting from intraspecific plant interactions are species-specific. These findings underscored the importance of species-specific in intraspecific plant interactions involving biological interactions among plants, which should be considered in future studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452219824000429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452219824000429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在陆地生态系统中,尤其是在人工控制的生态系统中,植物种内相互作用至关重要。了解植物根系的发育有助于控制根系的性状,从而提高农牧业生态系统的生产力和可持续性。迄今为止,大多数关于植物间相互作用的研究都集中在环境因素或单个物种上;然而,由于缺乏跨物种比较分析,研究结果存在很大差异。在这项研究中,我们利用高山草地的五个优势物种进行了温室实验,包括三个豆科物种(Thermopsis lanceolata、Oxytropis ochrocephala 和 Tibetia himalaica)和两个禾本科物种(Elymus nutans 和 Stipa aliena)。以单株栽培为对照,我们研究了两株同种植物一起生长(种内)时植物生物量和根系性状的总体变化。同时,我们还探讨了互作区和非互作区根系性状的差异。结果表明:首先,单株种植时,不同区域的生物量和根系性状没有显著差异。但种内交互作用对邻近植物的影响表现出明显的物种特异性。在生物量和根系性状方面(除分叉外),E. nutans、T. lanceolata 和 T. himalaica 对邻近植物的反应显著为负。而 S. aliena 和 O. ochrocephala 没有出现明显变化,甚至出现了正反应。无论是交互作用还是非交互作用,根区变化的总体趋势是一致的,要么同时增加,要么同时减少,只是程度不同。例如,T. lanceolata 和 O. ochrocephala 的交互作用区和非交互作用区之间的差异很大,导致异速生长。最后,我们的研究结果表明,除 E. nutans 外,五个物种中有四个物种的理化和营养因子与根系特征的相关性较差。总之,我们的研究结果证实,植物种内相互作用导致的根系性状变化具有物种特异性。这些发现强调了物种特异性在涉及植物间生物相互作用的种内植物相互作用中的重要性,在今后的研究中应加以考虑。
Variations in plant root traits shaped by intraspecific interactions are species-specific
Intraspecific plant interactions are crucial in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in artificially controlled ecosystems. Understanding plant root development can facilitate the manipulation of root traits to enhance the productivity and sustainability of agricultural and pastoral ecosystems. To date, most studies on interactions between the plants have focused on environmental factors or individual species; however, the lack of cross-species comparative analyses has resulted in a significant disparity in findings. In this study, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using five dominant species from alpine grasslands, including three legume species (Thermopsis lanceolata, Oxytropis ochrocephala, and Tibetia himalaica) and two grass species (Elymus nutans and Stipa aliena). Using single-plant cultivation as the control, we investigated the overall changes in plant biomass and root traits when two conspecific plants are grown together (intraspecifically). Simultaneously, we explored the differences in roots traits between the interaction and no-interaction zones. The results showed that, firstly, there was no significant difference in biomass and root traits of different zones when single-planted. But the impact of intraspecific interactions on neighboring plants exhibited significant species-specific. In terms of biomass and root traits (except for forks), E. nutans, T. lanceolata and T. himalaica responded significantly negatively to their neighbors. Whereas S. aliena and O. ochrocephala showed no significant changes and even positive responses. The overall trend of changes in the root zones, whether interactive or non-interactive, was consistent, either increasing or decreasing simultaneously, albeit to different extents. For instance, the difference between the interaction and no-interaction zones of T. lanceolata and O. ochrocephala was substantial, leading to allometric growth. Finally, our results showed poor correlations of physicochemical and nutrient factors with root traits in four of the five species, all except for E. nutans. Altogether, our findings confirmed that root trait variations resulting from intraspecific plant interactions are species-specific. These findings underscored the importance of species-specific in intraspecific plant interactions involving biological interactions among plants, which should be considered in future studies.