教师每天的压力与浮力之间的关系:两项每日日记研究

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Contemporary Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102276
Joost Jansen in de Wal , Thijmen van Alphen , Jaap Schuitema , Lucija Andre , Joran Jongerling , Thea Peetsma
{"title":"教师每天的压力与浮力之间的关系:两项每日日记研究","authors":"Joost Jansen in de Wal ,&nbsp;Thijmen van Alphen ,&nbsp;Jaap Schuitema ,&nbsp;Lucija Andre ,&nbsp;Joran Jongerling ,&nbsp;Thea Peetsma","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the pertinence of teachers’ buoyancy to ‘everyday work’, existing studies do not investigate buoyancy in close proximity to everyday experiences. Nor does existing research longitudinally investigate teachers’ buoyancy and how it relates to stress. This paper describes two quantitative daily diary studies on this relationship. Study 1 includes a relatively large sample of teachers (N = 151), compared to the number of days that they were followed (T = 15). Study 2 includes relatively few teachers (N = 10), but follows them for an extended period of time (T = 61). Both studies tested hypotheses regarding the extent to which teachers’ stress and buoyancy beliefs vary − and carry over − from day to day and the extent to which teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress experiences co-occur and predict each other from day to day and from teacher to teacher. Results showed that both teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress experiences varied and carried over significantly from day to day, although carryover effects were small. The relationship between buoyancy beliefs and stress was negative from teacher to teacher and concurrently from day to day. However, cross-lagged effects between both constructs from day to day were not significant. These results imply that both teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress are malleable, state-like constructs to a considerable extent, but their dynamics likely occur on a timescale that is smaller than daily.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000213/pdfft?md5=bff0ffa0f910d20eb78ed786e583ae5d&pid=1-s2.0-S0361476X24000213-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between teachers’ stress and buoyancy from day to day: Two daily diary studies\",\"authors\":\"Joost Jansen in de Wal ,&nbsp;Thijmen van Alphen ,&nbsp;Jaap Schuitema ,&nbsp;Lucija Andre ,&nbsp;Joran Jongerling ,&nbsp;Thea Peetsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the pertinence of teachers’ buoyancy to ‘everyday work’, existing studies do not investigate buoyancy in close proximity to everyday experiences. Nor does existing research longitudinally investigate teachers’ buoyancy and how it relates to stress. This paper describes two quantitative daily diary studies on this relationship. Study 1 includes a relatively large sample of teachers (N = 151), compared to the number of days that they were followed (T = 15). Study 2 includes relatively few teachers (N = 10), but follows them for an extended period of time (T = 61). Both studies tested hypotheses regarding the extent to which teachers’ stress and buoyancy beliefs vary − and carry over − from day to day and the extent to which teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress experiences co-occur and predict each other from day to day and from teacher to teacher. Results showed that both teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress experiences varied and carried over significantly from day to day, although carryover effects were small. The relationship between buoyancy beliefs and stress was negative from teacher to teacher and concurrently from day to day. However, cross-lagged effects between both constructs from day to day were not significant. These results imply that both teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress are malleable, state-like constructs to a considerable extent, but their dynamics likely occur on a timescale that is smaller than daily.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000213/pdfft?md5=bff0ffa0f910d20eb78ed786e583ae5d&pid=1-s2.0-S0361476X24000213-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000213\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000213","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管教师的浮力与 "日常工作 "密切相关,但现有的研究并没有对浮力与日常经 历的密切关系进行调查。现有研究也没有纵向调查教师的浮力及其与压力的关系。本文介绍了关于这种关系的两项每日日记定量研究。研究 1 包括了相对较多的教师样本(N = 151),而对他们进行跟踪调查的天数(T = 15)则相对较少。研究 2 的教师人数相对较少(N = 10),但对他们进行了较长时间的跟踪调查(T = 61)。这两项研究都检验了以下假设:教师的压力和浮力信念在多大程度上每天都会发生变化和延续,以及教师的浮力信念和压力体验在多大程度上每天都会同时出现并相互预测。结果表明,教师的浮力信念和压力体验每天都有显著的变化和延续,尽管延续效应很小。浮力信念与压力之间的关系在教师与教师之间是负相关的,在一天与一天之间也是同时存在的。然而,这两个构念之间每天的交叉滞后效应并不显著。这些结果表明,教师的浮力信念和压力在很大程度上都是可塑的、类似于状态的建构,但其动态变化的时间尺度可能小于每天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between teachers’ stress and buoyancy from day to day: Two daily diary studies

Despite the pertinence of teachers’ buoyancy to ‘everyday work’, existing studies do not investigate buoyancy in close proximity to everyday experiences. Nor does existing research longitudinally investigate teachers’ buoyancy and how it relates to stress. This paper describes two quantitative daily diary studies on this relationship. Study 1 includes a relatively large sample of teachers (N = 151), compared to the number of days that they were followed (T = 15). Study 2 includes relatively few teachers (N = 10), but follows them for an extended period of time (T = 61). Both studies tested hypotheses regarding the extent to which teachers’ stress and buoyancy beliefs vary − and carry over − from day to day and the extent to which teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress experiences co-occur and predict each other from day to day and from teacher to teacher. Results showed that both teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress experiences varied and carried over significantly from day to day, although carryover effects were small. The relationship between buoyancy beliefs and stress was negative from teacher to teacher and concurrently from day to day. However, cross-lagged effects between both constructs from day to day were not significant. These results imply that both teachers’ buoyancy beliefs and stress are malleable, state-like constructs to a considerable extent, but their dynamics likely occur on a timescale that is smaller than daily.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
期刊最新文献
It’s not all about recognition and Influence: The role of communal and agentic goals and motives in science for diverse high school students Three applications of semantic network analysis to individual student think-aloud data An exploratory experiment investigating teachers’ attributional race and gender bias and the moderating effects of personal experience of racial discrimination How much active teaching should be incorporated into college course lectures to promote active learning? Self-efficacy inertia: The role of competency beliefs and academic burden in achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1