环境、社会和治理基金是否为获得更高的流动性而进行投资组合抽水?本福德定律的应用

Aineas Mallios, Taylan Mavruk
{"title":"环境、社会和治理基金是否为获得更高的流动性而进行投资组合抽水?本福德定律的应用","authors":"Aineas Mallios, Taylan Mavruk","doi":"10.1002/ijfe.2976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portfolio pumping is identified as an ‘illegal’ trading practice that involves inflating quarter‐ and year‐end portfolio returns. Utilizing U.S. domestic equity mutual fund daily return data, we examine whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) funds engage in portfolio pumping to generate higher flows. Our findings reveal that, on average, ESG funds attract 0.4% higher flows than other funds. However, they engage in portfolio pumping and achieve returns that are 5.3 basis points (bps) higher at quarter ends compared to their returns during the rest of the year. This practice does not result in additional fund flows. Notably, compared to other funds, ESG funds exhibit a significant 4 bps reduction through portfolio pumping. This implies that, on the last day of the quarter, ESG funds earn approximately 4 bps lower returns compared to other funds. Portfolio pumping is costly for both investors and financial markets since it leads to trading activities that cause stock prices to deviate from their fundamental values. ESG funds engage less in portfolio pumping than other funds, which indicates that their primary focus is to maximize fund flows rather than enhance or create a positive social impact on the underlying firm portfolio. Investors seem to understand this goal, particularly when ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping and avoid investing in ESG funds.","PeriodicalId":501193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance and Economics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping to gain higher flows? An application of Benford's Law\",\"authors\":\"Aineas Mallios, Taylan Mavruk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijfe.2976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Portfolio pumping is identified as an ‘illegal’ trading practice that involves inflating quarter‐ and year‐end portfolio returns. Utilizing U.S. domestic equity mutual fund daily return data, we examine whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) funds engage in portfolio pumping to generate higher flows. Our findings reveal that, on average, ESG funds attract 0.4% higher flows than other funds. However, they engage in portfolio pumping and achieve returns that are 5.3 basis points (bps) higher at quarter ends compared to their returns during the rest of the year. This practice does not result in additional fund flows. Notably, compared to other funds, ESG funds exhibit a significant 4 bps reduction through portfolio pumping. This implies that, on the last day of the quarter, ESG funds earn approximately 4 bps lower returns compared to other funds. Portfolio pumping is costly for both investors and financial markets since it leads to trading activities that cause stock prices to deviate from their fundamental values. ESG funds engage less in portfolio pumping than other funds, which indicates that their primary focus is to maximize fund flows rather than enhance or create a positive social impact on the underlying firm portfolio. Investors seem to understand this goal, particularly when ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping and avoid investing in ESG funds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Finance and Economics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Finance and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

投资组合抽水被认为是一种 "非法 "交易行为,涉及夸大季度和年终投资组合回报。利用美国国内股票共同基金的每日回报数据,我们研究了环境、社会和治理(ESG)基金是否参与投资组合抽水以获得更高的流量。我们的研究结果表明,ESG 基金吸引的流量平均比其他基金高 0.4%。然而,与一年中其他时间的回报相比,ESG 基金在季度末进行投资组合抽水并获得了高出 5.3 个基点的回报。这种做法并没有带来额外的资金流量。值得注意的是,与其他基金相比,ESG 基金的投资组合抽水大幅减少了 4 个基点。这意味着,在季度的最后一天,ESG 基金的收益比其他基金低约 4 个基点。投资组合抽水对投资者和金融市场来说都是代价高昂的,因为它会导致交易活动,使股票价格偏离其基本价值。与其他基金相比,ESG 基金的投资组合抽水行为较少,这表明其主要关注点是最大限度地提高资金流量,而不是增强或创造对相关公司投资组合的积极社会影响。投资者似乎理解这一目标,尤其是当 ESG 基金参与投资组合抽水时,投资者会避免投资 ESG 基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping to gain higher flows? An application of Benford's Law
Portfolio pumping is identified as an ‘illegal’ trading practice that involves inflating quarter‐ and year‐end portfolio returns. Utilizing U.S. domestic equity mutual fund daily return data, we examine whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) funds engage in portfolio pumping to generate higher flows. Our findings reveal that, on average, ESG funds attract 0.4% higher flows than other funds. However, they engage in portfolio pumping and achieve returns that are 5.3 basis points (bps) higher at quarter ends compared to their returns during the rest of the year. This practice does not result in additional fund flows. Notably, compared to other funds, ESG funds exhibit a significant 4 bps reduction through portfolio pumping. This implies that, on the last day of the quarter, ESG funds earn approximately 4 bps lower returns compared to other funds. Portfolio pumping is costly for both investors and financial markets since it leads to trading activities that cause stock prices to deviate from their fundamental values. ESG funds engage less in portfolio pumping than other funds, which indicates that their primary focus is to maximize fund flows rather than enhance or create a positive social impact on the underlying firm portfolio. Investors seem to understand this goal, particularly when ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping and avoid investing in ESG funds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Monetary policy and equity returns: The role of investor risk aversion Monetary policy transmission under pandemic uncertainty: Effect on banks' risk and capital adjustments International mergers and acquisitions and institutional differences: An integrated approach Islamic mutual funds: Seasonal patterns and determinants of performance across regions The moderating role of governance on the nexus of financial crime and sustainable development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1