从制度主义看可持续性:韩国公司环境、社会和公司治理绩效的决定因素

IF 2.2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Asian Business & Management Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1057/s41291-024-00271-8
{"title":"从制度主义看可持续性:韩国公司环境、社会和公司治理绩效的决定因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1057/s41291-024-00271-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This study delves into the factors influencing the sustainability performance of Korean companies, as measured by ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) scores, through the neo-institutional theory perspective. While existing research has focused on the relationship between an organization’s ESG performance and its financial outcomes, this study concentrates on analyzing how the firm’s legitimacy signaling, stakeholder pressures, visibility, and government industry regulations impact sustainability performance among listed Korean companies. Our empirical analysis indicates that the ESG scores reflecting a firm’s sustainability performance are positively influenced by all four factors. First, this study may contribute to the sustainability literature by providing a coherent and rich theoretical foundation. Second, this study may contribute to viewing the phenomenon related to sustainability from various angles. In addition, by verifying in more detail the impact of gaining legitimacy through the introduction of institutional norms in the existing new institutionalism discourse on organizational survival and growth, legitimacy signals, and corporate visibility, the theoretical contribution of this study can also be made by uncovering an intermediate mechanism in which various institutional factors such as stakeholder pressure and institutional regulations can be advantageous for growth and survival by substantially improving the sustainability management level of an organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":46512,"journal":{"name":"Asian Business & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability from institutionalism: determinants of Korean companies’ ESG performances\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41291-024-00271-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This study delves into the factors influencing the sustainability performance of Korean companies, as measured by ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) scores, through the neo-institutional theory perspective. While existing research has focused on the relationship between an organization’s ESG performance and its financial outcomes, this study concentrates on analyzing how the firm’s legitimacy signaling, stakeholder pressures, visibility, and government industry regulations impact sustainability performance among listed Korean companies. Our empirical analysis indicates that the ESG scores reflecting a firm’s sustainability performance are positively influenced by all four factors. First, this study may contribute to the sustainability literature by providing a coherent and rich theoretical foundation. Second, this study may contribute to viewing the phenomenon related to sustainability from various angles. In addition, by verifying in more detail the impact of gaining legitimacy through the introduction of institutional norms in the existing new institutionalism discourse on organizational survival and growth, legitimacy signals, and corporate visibility, the theoretical contribution of this study can also be made by uncovering an intermediate mechanism in which various institutional factors such as stakeholder pressure and institutional regulations can be advantageous for growth and survival by substantially improving the sustainability management level of an organization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Business & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Business & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-024-00271-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Business & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-024-00271-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 本研究通过新制度理论的视角,深入探讨了影响韩国公司可持续发展绩效的因素,这些因素是通过 ESG(环境、社会和治理)得分来衡量的。现有研究主要关注企业的环境、社会和治理绩效与其财务结果之间的关系,而本研究则集中分析企业的合法性信号、利益相关者压力、知名度和政府行业法规如何影响韩国上市公司的可持续发展绩效。我们的实证分析表明,反映企业可持续发展绩效的 ESG 分数受到这四个因素的积极影响。首先,本研究提供了一个连贯而丰富的理论基础,有助于可持续发展文献的研究。其次,本研究有助于从不同角度看待与可持续发展相关的现象。此外,通过更详细地验证现有新制度主义论述中通过引入制度规范获得合法性对组织生存与发展、合法性信号和企业知名度的影响,本研究的理论贡献还在于揭示了一种中间机制,即利益相关者压力和制度规范等各种制度因素可以通过大幅提高组织的可持续管理水平来促进组织的发展和生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability from institutionalism: determinants of Korean companies’ ESG performances

Abstract

This study delves into the factors influencing the sustainability performance of Korean companies, as measured by ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) scores, through the neo-institutional theory perspective. While existing research has focused on the relationship between an organization’s ESG performance and its financial outcomes, this study concentrates on analyzing how the firm’s legitimacy signaling, stakeholder pressures, visibility, and government industry regulations impact sustainability performance among listed Korean companies. Our empirical analysis indicates that the ESG scores reflecting a firm’s sustainability performance are positively influenced by all four factors. First, this study may contribute to the sustainability literature by providing a coherent and rich theoretical foundation. Second, this study may contribute to viewing the phenomenon related to sustainability from various angles. In addition, by verifying in more detail the impact of gaining legitimacy through the introduction of institutional norms in the existing new institutionalism discourse on organizational survival and growth, legitimacy signals, and corporate visibility, the theoretical contribution of this study can also be made by uncovering an intermediate mechanism in which various institutional factors such as stakeholder pressure and institutional regulations can be advantageous for growth and survival by substantially improving the sustainability management level of an organization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Asian Business & Management (ABM) is an academic management and business journal with a focus on Asia. The journal covers topics in the areas of corporate governance, human resource management, marketing, organizational behavior, organization theory, strategy, technology management, and related areas. ABM distinguishes itself from general business and management journals as it focuses on the Asian context. The focus on Asia is an important and appealing feature of ABM. ABM is open to different methodological approaches, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and conceptual work, contributing to an enhanced understanding of Asian business and management. Please refer to the 2018 Editorial for further details: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41291-017-0028-0  A rigorous double-blind peer review system, involving in-country and international refereeing, ensures that articles meet the highest quality standards.
期刊最新文献
Rural women entrepreneurship: when femininity compensates for institutional hurdles Digital transformation and digital dynamic capabilities improvement in low-medium technology sector: evidence from Thai family firms Political tie diversity and inclusion at work in Asia: a critical view and a roadmap High-performance work systems and firm performance: the mediation effect of the quality of employee turnover Sustainability from institutionalism: determinants of Korean companies’ ESG performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1