面对人类世无处不在的人类影响,重新思考生态位和地理分布问题

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1111/brv.13077
Xiao Feng, A. Townsend Peterson, Luis José Aguirre-López, Joseph R. Burger, Xin Chen, Monica Papeş
{"title":"面对人类世无处不在的人类影响,重新思考生态位和地理分布问题","authors":"Xiao Feng,&nbsp;A. Townsend Peterson,&nbsp;Luis José Aguirre-López,&nbsp;Joseph R. Burger,&nbsp;Xin Chen,&nbsp;Monica Papeş","doi":"10.1111/brv.13077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Species are distributed in predictable ways in geographic spaces. The three principal factors that determine geographic distributions of species are biotic interactions (<b>B</b>), abiotic conditions (<b>A</b>), and dispersal ability or mobility (<b>M</b>). A species is expected to be present in areas that are accessible to it and that contain suitable sets of abiotic and biotic conditions for it to persist. A species' probability of presence can be quantified as a combination of responses to <b>B</b>, <b>A</b>, and <b>M</b> <i>via</i> ecological niche modeling (ENM; also frequently referred to as species distribution modeling or SDM). This analytical approach has been used broadly in ecology and biogeography, as well as in conservation planning and decision-making, but commonly in the context of ‘natural’ settings. However, it is increasingly recognized that human impacts, including changes in climate, land cover, and ecosystem function, greatly influence species' geographic ranges. In this light, historical distinctions between natural and anthropogenic factors have become blurred, and a coupled human–natural landscape is recognized as the new norm. Therefore, <b>B</b>, <b>A</b>, and <b>M</b> (BAM) factors need to be reconsidered to understand and quantify species' distributions in a world with a pervasive signature of human impacts. Here, we present a framework, termed human-influenced BAM (Hi-BAM, for distributional ecology that (<i>i</i>) conceptualizes human impacts in the form of six drivers, and (<i>ii</i>) synthesizes previous studies to show how each driver modifies the natural BAM and species' distributions. Given the importance and prevalence of human impacts on species distributions globally, we also discuss implications of this framework for ENM/SDM methods, and explore strategies by which to incorporate increasing human impacts in the methodology. Human impacts are redefining biogeographic patterns; as such, future studies should incorporate signals of human impacts integrally in modeling and forecasting species' distributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"99 4","pages":"1481-1503"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking ecological niches and geographic distributions in face of pervasive human influence in the Anthropocene\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Feng,&nbsp;A. Townsend Peterson,&nbsp;Luis José Aguirre-López,&nbsp;Joseph R. Burger,&nbsp;Xin Chen,&nbsp;Monica Papeş\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.13077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Species are distributed in predictable ways in geographic spaces. The three principal factors that determine geographic distributions of species are biotic interactions (<b>B</b>), abiotic conditions (<b>A</b>), and dispersal ability or mobility (<b>M</b>). A species is expected to be present in areas that are accessible to it and that contain suitable sets of abiotic and biotic conditions for it to persist. A species' probability of presence can be quantified as a combination of responses to <b>B</b>, <b>A</b>, and <b>M</b> <i>via</i> ecological niche modeling (ENM; also frequently referred to as species distribution modeling or SDM). This analytical approach has been used broadly in ecology and biogeography, as well as in conservation planning and decision-making, but commonly in the context of ‘natural’ settings. However, it is increasingly recognized that human impacts, including changes in climate, land cover, and ecosystem function, greatly influence species' geographic ranges. In this light, historical distinctions between natural and anthropogenic factors have become blurred, and a coupled human–natural landscape is recognized as the new norm. Therefore, <b>B</b>, <b>A</b>, and <b>M</b> (BAM) factors need to be reconsidered to understand and quantify species' distributions in a world with a pervasive signature of human impacts. Here, we present a framework, termed human-influenced BAM (Hi-BAM, for distributional ecology that (<i>i</i>) conceptualizes human impacts in the form of six drivers, and (<i>ii</i>) synthesizes previous studies to show how each driver modifies the natural BAM and species' distributions. Given the importance and prevalence of human impacts on species distributions globally, we also discuss implications of this framework for ENM/SDM methods, and explore strategies by which to incorporate increasing human impacts in the methodology. Human impacts are redefining biogeographic patterns; as such, future studies should incorporate signals of human impacts integrally in modeling and forecasting species' distributions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"99 4\",\"pages\":\"1481-1503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13077\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13077\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种在地理空间中的分布是可以预测的。决定物种地理分布的三个主要因素是生物相互作用(B)、非生物条件(A)和扩散能力或流动性(M)。一个物种预计会出现在它可以到达的地区,这些地区包含适合它生存的非生物和生物条件。通过生态位建模(ENM,也常称为物种分布建模或 SDM),可以将物种存在的概率量化为对 B、A 和 M 的反应组合。这种分析方法已广泛应用于生态学和生物地理学以及保护规划和决策中,但通常是在 "自然 "环境下使用。然而,越来越多的人认识到,人类的影响,包括气候、土地覆盖和生态系统功能的变化,会极大地影响物种的地理分布范围。有鉴于此,历史上自然因素与人为因素之间的区别已变得模糊,人类与自然的耦合景观被认为是新的规范。因此,需要重新考虑B、A和M(BAM)因素,以了解和量化物种在人类影响普遍存在的世界中的分布情况。在此,我们为分布生态学提出了一个框架,称为 "受人类影响的BAM(Hi-BAM)",该框架(i)以六种驱动因素的形式将人类影响概念化,(ii)综合先前的研究,说明每种驱动因素如何改变自然BAM和物种分布。鉴于人类影响对全球物种分布的重要性和普遍性,我们还讨论了这一框架对 ENM/SDM 方法的影响,并探讨了将日益增加的人类影响纳入该方法的策略。人类影响正在重新定义生物地理格局;因此,未来的研究应将人类影响的信号综合纳入物种分布的建模和预测中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking ecological niches and geographic distributions in face of pervasive human influence in the Anthropocene

Species are distributed in predictable ways in geographic spaces. The three principal factors that determine geographic distributions of species are biotic interactions (B), abiotic conditions (A), and dispersal ability or mobility (M). A species is expected to be present in areas that are accessible to it and that contain suitable sets of abiotic and biotic conditions for it to persist. A species' probability of presence can be quantified as a combination of responses to B, A, and M via ecological niche modeling (ENM; also frequently referred to as species distribution modeling or SDM). This analytical approach has been used broadly in ecology and biogeography, as well as in conservation planning and decision-making, but commonly in the context of ‘natural’ settings. However, it is increasingly recognized that human impacts, including changes in climate, land cover, and ecosystem function, greatly influence species' geographic ranges. In this light, historical distinctions between natural and anthropogenic factors have become blurred, and a coupled human–natural landscape is recognized as the new norm. Therefore, B, A, and M (BAM) factors need to be reconsidered to understand and quantify species' distributions in a world with a pervasive signature of human impacts. Here, we present a framework, termed human-influenced BAM (Hi-BAM, for distributional ecology that (i) conceptualizes human impacts in the form of six drivers, and (ii) synthesizes previous studies to show how each driver modifies the natural BAM and species' distributions. Given the importance and prevalence of human impacts on species distributions globally, we also discuss implications of this framework for ENM/SDM methods, and explore strategies by which to incorporate increasing human impacts in the methodology. Human impacts are redefining biogeographic patterns; as such, future studies should incorporate signals of human impacts integrally in modeling and forecasting species' distributions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
期刊最新文献
Towards ecosystem-based techniques for tipping point detection. Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion. Testosterone mediates life-history trade-offs in female mammals. Zooming in the plastisphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton-plastic interactions in aquatic ecosystems. Archaeocytes in sponges: simple cells of complicated fate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1