审查电子健康记录中用于定义高血压的代码表,并制定用于研究的代码表

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002640
Georgie May Massen, Philip W Stone, Harley H Y Kwok, Gisli Jenkins, Richard J Allen, Louise V Wain, Iain Stewart, Jennifer Kathleen Quint
{"title":"审查电子健康记录中用于定义高血压的代码表,并制定用于研究的代码表","authors":"Georgie May Massen, Philip W Stone, Harley H Y Kwok, Gisli Jenkins, Richard J Allen, Louise V Wain, Iain Stewart, Jennifer Kathleen Quint","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Electronic health records (EHRs) are routinely collected throughout a person’s care, recording all aspects of health status, including current and past conditions, prescriptions and test results. EHRs can be used for epidemiological research. However, there are nuances in the way conditions are recorded using clinical coding; it is important to understand the methods which have been applied to define exposures, covariates and outcomes to enable interpretation of study findings. This study aimed to identify codelists used to define hypertension in studies that use EHRs and generate recommended codelists to support reproducibility and consistency. Eligibility criteria Studies included populations with hypertension defined within an EHR between January 2010 and August 2023 and were systematically identified using MEDLINE and Embase. A summary of the most frequently used sources and codes is described. Due to an absence of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) codelists in the literature, a recommended SNOMED CT codelist was developed to aid consistency and standardisation of hypertension research using EHRs. Findings 375 manuscripts met the study criteria and were eligible for inclusion, and 112 (29.9%) reported codelists. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) was the most frequently used clinical terminology, 59 manuscripts provided ICD 9 codelists (53%) and 58 included ICD 10 codelists (52%). Informed by commonly used ICD and Read codes, usage recommendations were made. We derived SNOMED CT codelists informed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for hypertension management. It is recommended that these codelists be used to identify hypertension in EHRs using SNOMED CT codes. Conclusions Less than one-third of hypertension studies using EHRs included their codelists. Transparent methodology for codelist creation is essential for replication and will aid interpretation of study findings. We created SNOMED CT codelists to support and standardise hypertension definitions in EHR studies. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All works included in this analysis are referenced in the supplementary Excel file. No additional data not located within the manuscripts were used.","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of codelists used to define hypertension in electronic health records and development of a codelist for research\",\"authors\":\"Georgie May Massen, Philip W Stone, Harley H Y Kwok, Gisli Jenkins, Richard J Allen, Louise V Wain, Iain Stewart, Jennifer Kathleen Quint\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aims Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Electronic health records (EHRs) are routinely collected throughout a person’s care, recording all aspects of health status, including current and past conditions, prescriptions and test results. EHRs can be used for epidemiological research. However, there are nuances in the way conditions are recorded using clinical coding; it is important to understand the methods which have been applied to define exposures, covariates and outcomes to enable interpretation of study findings. This study aimed to identify codelists used to define hypertension in studies that use EHRs and generate recommended codelists to support reproducibility and consistency. Eligibility criteria Studies included populations with hypertension defined within an EHR between January 2010 and August 2023 and were systematically identified using MEDLINE and Embase. A summary of the most frequently used sources and codes is described. Due to an absence of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) codelists in the literature, a recommended SNOMED CT codelist was developed to aid consistency and standardisation of hypertension research using EHRs. Findings 375 manuscripts met the study criteria and were eligible for inclusion, and 112 (29.9%) reported codelists. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) was the most frequently used clinical terminology, 59 manuscripts provided ICD 9 codelists (53%) and 58 included ICD 10 codelists (52%). Informed by commonly used ICD and Read codes, usage recommendations were made. We derived SNOMED CT codelists informed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for hypertension management. It is recommended that these codelists be used to identify hypertension in EHRs using SNOMED CT codes. Conclusions Less than one-third of hypertension studies using EHRs included their codelists. Transparent methodology for codelist creation is essential for replication and will aid interpretation of study findings. We created SNOMED CT codelists to support and standardise hypertension definitions in EHR studies. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All works included in this analysis are referenced in the supplementary Excel file. No additional data not located within the manuscripts were used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 高血压是心血管疾病的主要风险因素。电子健康记录(EHR)是在个人护理过程中定期收集的,记录了健康状况的各个方面,包括当前和过去的状况、处方和检查结果。电子健康记录可用于流行病学研究。然而,使用临床编码记录病情的方式存在细微差别;了解用于定义暴露、协变量和结果的方法对于解释研究结果非常重要。本研究旨在确定使用电子病历的研究中用于定义高血压的代码表,并生成推荐的代码表,以支持可重复性和一致性。资格标准 研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间电子病历中定义的高血压人群,并通过 MEDLINE 和 Embase 进行了系统识别。本文概述了最常用的来源和代码。由于文献中缺乏系统化医学临床术语(SNOMED CT)编码表,因此开发了一个推荐的 SNOMED CT 编码表,以帮助使用电子病历进行高血压研究的一致性和标准化。研究结果 有 375 篇手稿符合研究标准并有资格纳入,其中 112 篇(29.9%)报告了编码表。国际疾病分类 (ICD) 是最常用的临床术语,59 篇稿件提供了 ICD 9 编码表(53%),58 篇提供了 ICD 10 编码表(52%)。根据常用的 ICD 和 Read 代码,我们提出了使用建议。我们根据美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)的高血压管理指南得出了 SNOMED CT 编码表。建议在使用 SNOMED CT 代码的电子病历中使用这些代码表来识别高血压。结论 在使用电子病历的高血压研究中,只有不到三分之一的研究纳入了其代码表。透明的代码表创建方法对于复制至关重要,并有助于解释研究结果。我们创建了 SNOMED CT 编码表,以支持电子病历研究中的高血压定义并使之标准化。所有与研究相关的数据均包含在文章中或作为补充信息上传。本分析中包含的所有作品均在补充 Excel 文件中提供了参考。未使用手稿中没有的其他数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of codelists used to define hypertension in electronic health records and development of a codelist for research
Background and aims Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Electronic health records (EHRs) are routinely collected throughout a person’s care, recording all aspects of health status, including current and past conditions, prescriptions and test results. EHRs can be used for epidemiological research. However, there are nuances in the way conditions are recorded using clinical coding; it is important to understand the methods which have been applied to define exposures, covariates and outcomes to enable interpretation of study findings. This study aimed to identify codelists used to define hypertension in studies that use EHRs and generate recommended codelists to support reproducibility and consistency. Eligibility criteria Studies included populations with hypertension defined within an EHR between January 2010 and August 2023 and were systematically identified using MEDLINE and Embase. A summary of the most frequently used sources and codes is described. Due to an absence of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) codelists in the literature, a recommended SNOMED CT codelist was developed to aid consistency and standardisation of hypertension research using EHRs. Findings 375 manuscripts met the study criteria and were eligible for inclusion, and 112 (29.9%) reported codelists. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) was the most frequently used clinical terminology, 59 manuscripts provided ICD 9 codelists (53%) and 58 included ICD 10 codelists (52%). Informed by commonly used ICD and Read codes, usage recommendations were made. We derived SNOMED CT codelists informed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for hypertension management. It is recommended that these codelists be used to identify hypertension in EHRs using SNOMED CT codes. Conclusions Less than one-third of hypertension studies using EHRs included their codelists. Transparent methodology for codelist creation is essential for replication and will aid interpretation of study findings. We created SNOMED CT codelists to support and standardise hypertension definitions in EHR studies. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All works included in this analysis are referenced in the supplementary Excel file. No additional data not located within the manuscripts were used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Composition of cardiac troponin release differs after marathon running and myocardial infarction. Association of prior tuberculosis with cardiovascular status in perinatally HIV-1-infected adolescents. Myocarditis after COVID-19 and influenza infections: insights from a large data set. Spectrum of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis due to T60A(p.Thr80Ala) variant in an Irish Amyloidosis Network. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in aortic stenosis patients before and after aortic valve replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1