保护供应链和特定关系投资中的专有信息

IF 2.6 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE FINANCIAL REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1111/fire.12391
In Ji Jang, Kristina Minnick, Alok Nemani
{"title":"保护供应链和特定关系投资中的专有信息","authors":"In Ji Jang,&nbsp;Kristina Minnick,&nbsp;Alok Nemani","doi":"10.1111/fire.12391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine whether the risk of losing proprietary information through the supply chain affects relationship-specific investment (RSI) decisions by supply chain partners. Using state courts' staggered adoption of the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine (IDD) as a shock to the firm's ability to protect proprietary information, we find that customers increase RSI when their supplier is headquartered in a state that adopts IDD. The effect is more substantial for customers who face a higher risk of losing proprietary information and with suppliers that are difficult to substitute. IDD also plays a more prominent role in the absence of alternate mechanisms that reduce contracting frictions, such as shared directors, common ownership, or joint ventures. Our results are robust to using cross-citation measures of RSI and alternative estimations that mitigate potential biases arising from the staggered difference-in-difference approach. Our findings suggest that proprietary information protection enables firms to reduce contracting frictions arising in supply chain relations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"59 4","pages":"923-952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safeguarding proprietary information in the supply chain and relationship-specific investments\",\"authors\":\"In Ji Jang,&nbsp;Kristina Minnick,&nbsp;Alok Nemani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fire.12391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examine whether the risk of losing proprietary information through the supply chain affects relationship-specific investment (RSI) decisions by supply chain partners. Using state courts' staggered adoption of the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine (IDD) as a shock to the firm's ability to protect proprietary information, we find that customers increase RSI when their supplier is headquartered in a state that adopts IDD. The effect is more substantial for customers who face a higher risk of losing proprietary information and with suppliers that are difficult to substitute. IDD also plays a more prominent role in the absence of alternate mechanisms that reduce contracting frictions, such as shared directors, common ownership, or joint ventures. Our results are robust to using cross-citation measures of RSI and alternative estimations that mitigate potential biases arising from the staggered difference-in-difference approach. Our findings suggest that proprietary information protection enables firms to reduce contracting frictions arising in supply chain relations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"923-952\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了通过供应链丢失专有信息的风险是否会影响供应链合作伙伴的特定关系投资(RSI)决策。利用各州法院交错采用 "不可避免披露原则"(IDD)作为对公司保护专有信息能力的冲击,我们发现当供应商的总部位于采用 IDD 的州时,客户会增加 RSI。对于那些面临较高专有信息丢失风险的客户和难以替代的供应商来说,这种影响更为显著。在缺乏减少契约摩擦的替代机制(如共享董事、共同所有权或合资企业)的情况下,IDD 的作用也更为显著。使用交叉引用的 RSI 测量方法和其他估算方法来减轻交错差分法可能产生的偏差,我们的结果都是稳健的。我们的研究结果表明,专有信息保护能使企业减少供应链关系中产生的契约摩擦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safeguarding proprietary information in the supply chain and relationship-specific investments

We examine whether the risk of losing proprietary information through the supply chain affects relationship-specific investment (RSI) decisions by supply chain partners. Using state courts' staggered adoption of the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine (IDD) as a shock to the firm's ability to protect proprietary information, we find that customers increase RSI when their supplier is headquartered in a state that adopts IDD. The effect is more substantial for customers who face a higher risk of losing proprietary information and with suppliers that are difficult to substitute. IDD also plays a more prominent role in the absence of alternate mechanisms that reduce contracting frictions, such as shared directors, common ownership, or joint ventures. Our results are robust to using cross-citation measures of RSI and alternative estimations that mitigate potential biases arising from the staggered difference-in-difference approach. Our findings suggest that proprietary information protection enables firms to reduce contracting frictions arising in supply chain relations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
28.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Issue Information From anecdotes to insights: Streamlining the research idea generation process Mandatory audit partner rotation and earnings informativeness in the bond market Carbon risk and equity prices The value of talents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1