用于海上油气钻井平台气体提升优化的经济模型预测控制器比较

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108685
João Bernardo Aranha Ribeiro , José Dolores Vergara Dietrich , Julio Elias Normey-Rico
{"title":"用于海上油气钻井平台气体提升优化的经济模型预测控制器比较","authors":"João Bernardo Aranha Ribeiro ,&nbsp;José Dolores Vergara Dietrich ,&nbsp;Julio Elias Normey-Rico","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comparative study of different control strategies to solve the gas-lift optimization (GLO) problem of offshore rigs. GLO consists of distributing the compressed gas between the wells to maximize oil production, considering several operational and process aspects such as the cost of flaring, price fluctuations, measurable noise, external disturbances, and plant-model mismatches. We compare and evaluate the performance of economic nonlinear model predictive control (ENMPC), Modifier-based EMPC (EMPC-Mod), EMPC with Local Linearization on Trajectory (EMPC-LLT), the static Real-Time Optimizer with Parameter Adaptation (ROPA), and the Active Constraint Control (ACC) based on feedback controllers. The study points out the advantages and drawbacks of each approach being useful for engineers to choose the most appropriate strategy. Moreover, the results show that the linear EMPCs and ROPA have similar performance to the theoretical optimal while maintaining minimal computational burden, and also that ACC is satisfactory for this case study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of economic model predictive controllers for gas-lift optimization in offshore oil and gas rigs\",\"authors\":\"João Bernardo Aranha Ribeiro ,&nbsp;José Dolores Vergara Dietrich ,&nbsp;Julio Elias Normey-Rico\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comparative study of different control strategies to solve the gas-lift optimization (GLO) problem of offshore rigs. GLO consists of distributing the compressed gas between the wells to maximize oil production, considering several operational and process aspects such as the cost of flaring, price fluctuations, measurable noise, external disturbances, and plant-model mismatches. We compare and evaluate the performance of economic nonlinear model predictive control (ENMPC), Modifier-based EMPC (EMPC-Mod), EMPC with Local Linearization on Trajectory (EMPC-LLT), the static Real-Time Optimizer with Parameter Adaptation (ROPA), and the Active Constraint Control (ACC) based on feedback controllers. The study points out the advantages and drawbacks of each approach being useful for engineers to choose the most appropriate strategy. Moreover, the results show that the linear EMPCs and ROPA have similar performance to the theoretical optimal while maintaining minimal computational burden, and also that ACC is satisfactory for this case study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135424001030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135424001030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对不同的控制策略进行了比较研究,以解决海上钻井平台的气体提升优化(GLO)问题。GLO 包括在油井之间分配压缩气体,以最大限度地提高石油产量,同时考虑到燃烧成本、价格波动、可测量噪声、外部干扰和工厂模型不匹配等多个操作和流程方面的问题。我们比较并评估了经济非线性模型预测控制 (ENMPC)、基于修改器的 EMPC (EMPC-Mod)、带轨迹局部线性化的 EMPC (EMPC-LLT)、带参数自适应的静态实时优化器 (ROPA) 以及基于反馈控制器的主动约束控制 (ACC) 的性能。研究指出了每种方法的优缺点,有助于工程师选择最合适的策略。此外,研究结果表明,线性 EMPC 和 ROPA 的性能与理论最佳值相近,同时保持最小的计算负担,而 ACC 在本案例研究中也令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of economic model predictive controllers for gas-lift optimization in offshore oil and gas rigs

This paper presents a comparative study of different control strategies to solve the gas-lift optimization (GLO) problem of offshore rigs. GLO consists of distributing the compressed gas between the wells to maximize oil production, considering several operational and process aspects such as the cost of flaring, price fluctuations, measurable noise, external disturbances, and plant-model mismatches. We compare and evaluate the performance of economic nonlinear model predictive control (ENMPC), Modifier-based EMPC (EMPC-Mod), EMPC with Local Linearization on Trajectory (EMPC-LLT), the static Real-Time Optimizer with Parameter Adaptation (ROPA), and the Active Constraint Control (ACC) based on feedback controllers. The study points out the advantages and drawbacks of each approach being useful for engineers to choose the most appropriate strategy. Moreover, the results show that the linear EMPCs and ROPA have similar performance to the theoretical optimal while maintaining minimal computational burden, and also that ACC is satisfactory for this case study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
期刊最新文献
Integrating smart manufacturing techniques into undergraduate education: A case study with heat exchanger Semi-supervised regression based on Representation Learning for fermentation processes On speeding-up modifier-adaptation schemes for real-time optimization Machine learning-based input-augmented Koopman modeling and predictive control of nonlinear processes Resilience-based explainable reinforcement learning in chemical process safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1