韩国慢性阻塞性肺病干粉吸入器使用者吸气流速峰值不达标的情况

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102298
Ji-Yong Moon , Sang Hyuk Kim , Youlim Kim , Hyun Lee , Chin Kook Rhee , Seung Won Ra , Chang Youl Lee , Joo Hun Park , Yong Bum Park , Kwang Ha Yoo
{"title":"韩国慢性阻塞性肺病干粉吸入器使用者吸气流速峰值不达标的情况","authors":"Ji-Yong Moon ,&nbsp;Sang Hyuk Kim ,&nbsp;Youlim Kim ,&nbsp;Hyun Lee ,&nbsp;Chin Kook Rhee ,&nbsp;Seung Won Ra ,&nbsp;Chang Youl Lee ,&nbsp;Joo Hun Park ,&nbsp;Yong Bum Park ,&nbsp;Kwang Ha Yoo","doi":"10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) in dry-powder inhaler (DPI) users can lead to insufficient therapeutic effects in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, few data on the prevalence of and factors associated with suboptimal PIFR in Korean patients with COPD are available.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with COPD who had been using DPIs for more than three months. PIFR was measured using an In-Check DIAL G16 device. Suboptimal PIFR was defined as below the resistance-matched threshold. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with suboptimal PIFR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 444 DPI users with COPD, the rate of suboptimal PIFR was 22.0 % (98/444). In a multivariable analysis, significant factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.06 by 1-year increase; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.09), male sex (aOR = 0.28; 95 % CI = 0.11–0.73), body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 0.91 by 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup> increase; 95 % CI = 0.85–0.99), post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (FVC) %pred (aOR = 0.97 by 1%pred increase; 95 % CI = 0.95–0.99), and In-Check DIAL R2-type inhaler [medium-low resistance] use (aOR = 3.70 compared with R1-type inhalers [low resistance]; 95 % CI = 2.03–7.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In Korea, more than one-fifth of DPI users with COPD had a suboptimal PIFR. The factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age, female gender, low BMI, low FVC, and R2-type inhaler use. Therefore, clinicians should carefully evaluate the possibility of suboptimal PIFR when prescribing DPIs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20799,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102298"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553924000142/pdfft?md5=b93e2894d7969eaf9d3d3e9beac1d9f6&pid=1-s2.0-S1094553924000142-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate in dry-powder inhaler users for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Korea\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Yong Moon ,&nbsp;Sang Hyuk Kim ,&nbsp;Youlim Kim ,&nbsp;Hyun Lee ,&nbsp;Chin Kook Rhee ,&nbsp;Seung Won Ra ,&nbsp;Chang Youl Lee ,&nbsp;Joo Hun Park ,&nbsp;Yong Bum Park ,&nbsp;Kwang Ha Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) in dry-powder inhaler (DPI) users can lead to insufficient therapeutic effects in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, few data on the prevalence of and factors associated with suboptimal PIFR in Korean patients with COPD are available.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with COPD who had been using DPIs for more than three months. PIFR was measured using an In-Check DIAL G16 device. Suboptimal PIFR was defined as below the resistance-matched threshold. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with suboptimal PIFR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 444 DPI users with COPD, the rate of suboptimal PIFR was 22.0 % (98/444). In a multivariable analysis, significant factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.06 by 1-year increase; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.09), male sex (aOR = 0.28; 95 % CI = 0.11–0.73), body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 0.91 by 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup> increase; 95 % CI = 0.85–0.99), post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (FVC) %pred (aOR = 0.97 by 1%pred increase; 95 % CI = 0.95–0.99), and In-Check DIAL R2-type inhaler [medium-low resistance] use (aOR = 3.70 compared with R1-type inhalers [low resistance]; 95 % CI = 2.03–7.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In Korea, more than one-fifth of DPI users with COPD had a suboptimal PIFR. The factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age, female gender, low BMI, low FVC, and R2-type inhaler use. Therefore, clinicians should carefully evaluate the possibility of suboptimal PIFR when prescribing DPIs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553924000142/pdfft?md5=b93e2894d7969eaf9d3d3e9beac1d9f6&pid=1-s2.0-S1094553924000142-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553924000142\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553924000142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景干粉吸入器(DPI)使用者吸气峰流速(PIFR)不达标会导致慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)治疗效果不佳。我们对使用干粉吸入器三个月以上的慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了一项横断面研究。使用 In-Check DIAL G16 设备测量了 PIFR。低于阻力匹配阈值即为PIFR不达标。结果 在 444 名患有慢性阻塞性肺病的干粉吸入器使用者中,PIFR 次优率为 22.0%(98/444)。在一项多变量分析中,与次优 PIFR 相关的重要因素包括年龄(调整后的几率比 [aOR] = 1.06,增加 1 年;95 % 置信区间 [CI] = 1.02-1.09)、男性性别(aOR = 0.28;95 % CI = 0.11-0.73)、体重指数 (BMI)(aOR = 0.91,增加 1 kg/m2; 95 % CI = 0.85-0.99)、支气管舒张术后 (COPD)、哮喘 (COPD)、呼吸道感染 (COPD)。结论在韩国,超过五分之一的慢性阻塞性肺病 DPI 使用者的 PIFR 不达标。与 PIFR 不达标相关的因素包括年龄、女性、低体重指数、低 FVC 和使用 R2 型吸入器。因此,临床医生在开具 DPI 处方时应仔细评估 PIFR 达不到最佳值的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate in dry-powder inhaler users for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Korea

Background

A suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) in dry-powder inhaler (DPI) users can lead to insufficient therapeutic effects in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, few data on the prevalence of and factors associated with suboptimal PIFR in Korean patients with COPD are available.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with COPD who had been using DPIs for more than three months. PIFR was measured using an In-Check DIAL G16 device. Suboptimal PIFR was defined as below the resistance-matched threshold. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with suboptimal PIFR.

Results

Of 444 DPI users with COPD, the rate of suboptimal PIFR was 22.0 % (98/444). In a multivariable analysis, significant factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.06 by 1-year increase; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.09), male sex (aOR = 0.28; 95 % CI = 0.11–0.73), body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 0.91 by 1 kg/m2 increase; 95 % CI = 0.85–0.99), post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (FVC) %pred (aOR = 0.97 by 1%pred increase; 95 % CI = 0.95–0.99), and In-Check DIAL R2-type inhaler [medium-low resistance] use (aOR = 3.70 compared with R1-type inhalers [low resistance]; 95 % CI = 2.03–7.03).

Conclusions

In Korea, more than one-fifth of DPI users with COPD had a suboptimal PIFR. The factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age, female gender, low BMI, low FVC, and R2-type inhaler use. Therefore, clinicians should carefully evaluate the possibility of suboptimal PIFR when prescribing DPIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (formerly Pulmonary Pharmacology) is concerned with lung pharmacology from molecular to clinical aspects. The subject matter encompasses the major diseases of the lung including asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary circulation, ARDS, carcinoma, bronchitis, emphysema and drug delivery. Laboratory and clinical research on man and animals will be considered including studies related to chemotherapy of cancer, tuberculosis and infection. In addition to original research papers the journal will include review articles and book reviews. Research Areas Include: • All major diseases of the lung • Physiology • Pathology • Drug delivery • Metabolism • Pulmonary Toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Triple inhaled therapy in asthma: beliefs, behaviours and doubts. Prevalence and clinical significance of pre- and post-bronchodilator airflow obstruction in COPD patients Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an immunomodulatory intervention in COVID-19-induced ARDS: Exploring clinical outcomes and transcriptomic signatures in a randomised controlled trial Interaction between fluticasone furoate and umeclidinium in passively sensitized isolated human airways Chest CT assess the impact of omalizumab treatment on airway remodeling in refractory asthma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1