让差异发挥作用:基于多主体感知的金融欺诈检测

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Emerging Markets Review Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101134
Guowen Li , Shuai Wang , Yuyao Feng
{"title":"让差异发挥作用:基于多主体感知的金融欺诈检测","authors":"Guowen Li ,&nbsp;Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Yuyao Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines whether internal and external perceptions and perception differences can significantly improve the effectiveness of financial fraud detection. Specifically, we construct and validate management and media perceptions using various state-of-the-art methods. The empirical research is based on data from 2017–2021 from the Chinese market. The results reveal that the enhancement effect is more significant when considering multi-subject perceptions. A cross-sectional analysis and application of real scenarios further support the conclusions. The predictive direction and implications of perception indicators are fully discussed. The results imply that the media can perceive firms' potentially fraudulent behaviour and play a regulatory role.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47886,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making differences work: Financial fraud detection based on multi-subject perceptions\",\"authors\":\"Guowen Li ,&nbsp;Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Yuyao Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines whether internal and external perceptions and perception differences can significantly improve the effectiveness of financial fraud detection. Specifically, we construct and validate management and media perceptions using various state-of-the-art methods. The empirical research is based on data from 2017–2021 from the Chinese market. The results reveal that the enhancement effect is more significant when considering multi-subject perceptions. A cross-sectional analysis and application of real scenarios further support the conclusions. The predictive direction and implications of perception indicators are fully discussed. The results imply that the media can perceive firms' potentially fraudulent behaviour and play a regulatory role.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging Markets Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging Markets Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014124000293\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014124000293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了内部和外部认知以及认知差异能否显著提高金融欺诈检测的有效性。具体而言,我们使用各种最先进的方法构建并验证了管理层和媒体的认知。实证研究基于 2017-2021 年中国市场的数据。结果显示,考虑多主体感知时,增强效应更为显著。横截面分析和真实场景的应用进一步支持了结论。对感知指标的预测方向和影响进行了充分讨论。研究结果表明,媒体可以感知企业潜在的欺诈行为并发挥监管作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making differences work: Financial fraud detection based on multi-subject perceptions

This study examines whether internal and external perceptions and perception differences can significantly improve the effectiveness of financial fraud detection. Specifically, we construct and validate management and media perceptions using various state-of-the-art methods. The empirical research is based on data from 2017–2021 from the Chinese market. The results reveal that the enhancement effect is more significant when considering multi-subject perceptions. A cross-sectional analysis and application of real scenarios further support the conclusions. The predictive direction and implications of perception indicators are fully discussed. The results imply that the media can perceive firms' potentially fraudulent behaviour and play a regulatory role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
100 days
期刊介绍: The intent of the editors is to consolidate Emerging Markets Review as the premier vehicle for publishing high impact empirical and theoretical studies in emerging markets finance. Preference will be given to comparative studies that take global and regional perspectives, detailed single country studies that address critical policy issues and have significant global and regional implications, and papers that address the interactions of national and international financial architecture. We especially welcome papers that take institutional as well as financial perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Disruptive technology and audit risks: Evidence from FTSE 100 companies Will Southeast Asia be the next global manufacturing hub? A multiway cointegration, causality, and dynamic connectedness analyses Climate policy and China's external balances International financial integration and financial stress of emerging market economies: The role of institutional quality CEO early-life experience and corporate accounting conservatism: Insights from the socio-political context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1