改进对砾石河床临界剪应力的预测:确定泥沙运移的起始点并量化泥沙结构

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1002/esp.5842
Rebecca A. Hodge, Hal E. Voepel, Elowyn M. Yager, Julian Leyland, Joel P. L. Johnson, David A. Sear, Sharif Ahmed
{"title":"改进对砾石河床临界剪应力的预测:确定泥沙运移的起始点并量化泥沙结构","authors":"Rebecca A. Hodge,&nbsp;Hal E. Voepel,&nbsp;Elowyn M. Yager,&nbsp;Julian Leyland,&nbsp;Joel P. L. Johnson,&nbsp;David A. Sear,&nbsp;Sharif Ahmed","doi":"10.1002/esp.5842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding when gravel moves in river beds is essential for a range of different applications but is still surprisingly hard to predict. Here we consider how our ability to predict critical shear stress (<i>τ</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>) is being improved by recent advances in two areas: (1) identifying the onset of bedload transport; and (2) quantifying grain-scale gravel bed structure. This paper addresses these areas through both an in-depth review and a comparison of new datasets of gravel structure collected using three different methods. We focus on advances in these two areas because of the need to understand how the conditions for sediment entrainment vary spatially and temporally, and because spatial and temporal changes in grain-scale structure are likely to be a major driver of changes in <i>τ</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>. We use data collected from a small gravel-bed stream using direct field-based measurements, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and computed tomography (CT) scanning, which is the first time that these methods have been directly compared. Using each method, we measure structure-relevant metrics including grain size distribution, grain protrusion and fine matrix content. We find that all three methods produce consistent measures of grain size, but that there is less agreement between measurements of grain protrusion and fine matrix content.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.5842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving predictions of critical shear stress in gravel bed rivers: Identifying the onset of sediment transport and quantifying sediment structure\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca A. Hodge,&nbsp;Hal E. Voepel,&nbsp;Elowyn M. Yager,&nbsp;Julian Leyland,&nbsp;Joel P. L. Johnson,&nbsp;David A. Sear,&nbsp;Sharif Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/esp.5842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Understanding when gravel moves in river beds is essential for a range of different applications but is still surprisingly hard to predict. Here we consider how our ability to predict critical shear stress (<i>τ</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>) is being improved by recent advances in two areas: (1) identifying the onset of bedload transport; and (2) quantifying grain-scale gravel bed structure. This paper addresses these areas through both an in-depth review and a comparison of new datasets of gravel structure collected using three different methods. We focus on advances in these two areas because of the need to understand how the conditions for sediment entrainment vary spatially and temporally, and because spatial and temporal changes in grain-scale structure are likely to be a major driver of changes in <i>τ</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>. We use data collected from a small gravel-bed stream using direct field-based measurements, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and computed tomography (CT) scanning, which is the first time that these methods have been directly compared. Using each method, we measure structure-relevant metrics including grain size distribution, grain protrusion and fine matrix content. We find that all three methods produce consistent measures of grain size, but that there is less agreement between measurements of grain protrusion and fine matrix content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.5842\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.5842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.5842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解砾石在河床中的移动时间对于一系列不同的应用至关重要,但令人惊讶的是,砾石移动时间仍然很难预测。在此,我们将探讨我们预测临界剪应力(τc)的能力是如何通过以下两个领域的最新进展而得到提高的:(1)确定河床载荷迁移的起始时间;(2)量化粒级砾石河床结构。本文通过对使用三种不同方法收集的砾石结构新数据集的深入回顾和比较,探讨了这些领域的问题。我们将重点放在这两个领域的进展上,因为我们需要了解沉积物夹带的条件在空间和时间上是如何变化的,还因为颗粒尺度结构在空间和时间上的变化很可能是 τc 变化的主要驱动力。我们使用直接实地测量、陆地激光扫描(TLS)和计算机断层扫描(CT)从一条小型砾石床溪流收集到的数据,这是首次对这些方法进行直接比较。我们使用每种方法测量与结构相关的指标,包括粒度分布、颗粒突出和细基质含量。我们发现,这三种方法对晶粒尺寸的测量结果一致,但对晶粒突出和细基质含量的测量结果之间的一致性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving predictions of critical shear stress in gravel bed rivers: Identifying the onset of sediment transport and quantifying sediment structure

Understanding when gravel moves in river beds is essential for a range of different applications but is still surprisingly hard to predict. Here we consider how our ability to predict critical shear stress (τc) is being improved by recent advances in two areas: (1) identifying the onset of bedload transport; and (2) quantifying grain-scale gravel bed structure. This paper addresses these areas through both an in-depth review and a comparison of new datasets of gravel structure collected using three different methods. We focus on advances in these two areas because of the need to understand how the conditions for sediment entrainment vary spatially and temporally, and because spatial and temporal changes in grain-scale structure are likely to be a major driver of changes in τc. We use data collected from a small gravel-bed stream using direct field-based measurements, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and computed tomography (CT) scanning, which is the first time that these methods have been directly compared. Using each method, we measure structure-relevant metrics including grain size distribution, grain protrusion and fine matrix content. We find that all three methods produce consistent measures of grain size, but that there is less agreement between measurements of grain protrusion and fine matrix content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Morphology, timing, and drivers of post‐glacial landslides in the northern Yellowstone region Detailed detection and extraction of estuarine tidal channels with multispectral and full‐polarised SAR remote sensing Estimation of friction factor and bed shear stress considering bedform effect in rivers An extreme wave event in Timanfaya National Park: Possible first geological evidence of the 1755 Lisbon tsunami in Lanzarote, Canary Islands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1