快讯:禁止评论(来自您):了解禁用社交媒体评论的人际和职业后果

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1177/00222429241252842
Michelle E. Daniels, Freeman Wu
{"title":"快讯:禁止评论(来自您):了解禁用社交媒体评论的人际和职业后果","authors":"Michelle E. Daniels, Freeman Wu","doi":"10.1177/00222429241252842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presumably in an effort to reduce cyberbullying and promote mental health, online influencers often limit viewers’ ability to post comments. In this research, we find that influencers incur significant interpersonal and professional repercussions for doing so. Across a Twitter dataset and six experiments utilizing both consequential and hypothetical dependent measures, we find that consumers form more negative impressions of and are less persuaded by influencers who disable social media comments. These outcomes are driven by the perception that the influencer is less receptive to consumer voice (e.g., consumers’ thoughts, opinions, and suggestions) and, thus, less sincere. However, we find that this effect is mitigated in situations where consumers feel that it is reasonable for influencers to prioritize self-protection.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: No Comments (from You): Understanding the Interpersonal and Professional Consequences of Disabling Social Media Comments\",\"authors\":\"Michelle E. Daniels, Freeman Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222429241252842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presumably in an effort to reduce cyberbullying and promote mental health, online influencers often limit viewers’ ability to post comments. In this research, we find that influencers incur significant interpersonal and professional repercussions for doing so. Across a Twitter dataset and six experiments utilizing both consequential and hypothetical dependent measures, we find that consumers form more negative impressions of and are less persuaded by influencers who disable social media comments. These outcomes are driven by the perception that the influencer is less receptive to consumer voice (e.g., consumers’ thoughts, opinions, and suggestions) and, thus, less sincere. However, we find that this effect is mitigated in situations where consumers feel that it is reasonable for influencers to prioritize self-protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241252842\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241252842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可能是为了减少网络欺凌和促进心理健康,网络影响者经常限制观众发表评论。在这项研究中,我们发现有影响力的人这样做会招致严重的人际和职业影响。在 Twitter 数据集和六个实验中,我们利用后果性和假设性因果测量方法,发现消费者对禁用社交媒体评论的有影响力者形成的负面印象更深,说服力更弱。造成这些结果的原因是消费者认为影响者不太愿意接受消费者的声音(如消费者的想法、意见和建议),因此也不太真诚。然而,我们发现在消费者认为影响者优先考虑自我保护是合理的情况下,这种影响会得到缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: No Comments (from You): Understanding the Interpersonal and Professional Consequences of Disabling Social Media Comments
Presumably in an effort to reduce cyberbullying and promote mental health, online influencers often limit viewers’ ability to post comments. In this research, we find that influencers incur significant interpersonal and professional repercussions for doing so. Across a Twitter dataset and six experiments utilizing both consequential and hypothetical dependent measures, we find that consumers form more negative impressions of and are less persuaded by influencers who disable social media comments. These outcomes are driven by the perception that the influencer is less receptive to consumer voice (e.g., consumers’ thoughts, opinions, and suggestions) and, thus, less sincere. However, we find that this effect is mitigated in situations where consumers feel that it is reasonable for influencers to prioritize self-protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Sales Performance Rankings: Examining the Impact of the Type of Information Displayed on Sales Force Outcomes EXPRESS: Positive Emotions During Search Engine Use: How You Feel Impacts What You Search for and Click On EXPRESS: Emotional Energy: When Customer Interactions Energize Service Employees EXPRESS: Self-Donations and Charitable Contributions in Online Crowdfunding: an Empirical Analysis EXPRESS: Intersectionality in Marketing: a Paradigm for Understanding Understudied Consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1