Pietro Li Volsi, G. Brogna, R. Gojon, T. Jardin, H. Parisot-Dupuis, J. Moschetta
{"title":"分析在运行限制条件下为实现低噪音和气动效率而优化的无人飞行器旋翼","authors":"Pietro Li Volsi, G. Brogna, R. Gojon, T. Jardin, H. Parisot-Dupuis, J. Moschetta","doi":"10.3390/fluids9040096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid growth of drone use in urban areas has prompted authorities to review airspace regulations, forcing drone manufacturers to anticipate and reduce the noise emissions during the design stage. Additionally, micro air vehicles (MAVs) are designed to be aerodynamically efficient, allowing them to fly farther, longer and safer. In this study, a steady aerodynamic code and an acoustic propagator based on the non-linear vortex lattice method (NVLM) and Farassat’s formulation-1A of the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) acoustic analogy, respectively, are coupled with pymoo, a python-based optimization framework. This tool is used to perform a multi-objective (noise and aerodynamic efficiency) optimization of a 20 cm diameter two-bladed rotor under hovering conditions. From the set of optimized results, (i.e., the Pareto front), three different rotors are 3D-printed using a stereolithography (SLA) technique and tested in an anechoic room. Here, an array of far-field microphones captures the acoustic radiation and directivity of the rotor, while a balance measures the aerodynamic performance. Both the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of the three different rotors, in line with what has been predicted by the numerical codes, are compared and guidelines for the design of aerodynamically and aeroacoustically efficient MAV rotors are extracted.","PeriodicalId":12397,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of MAV Rotors Optimized for Low Noise and Aerodynamic Efficiency with Operational Constraints\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Li Volsi, G. Brogna, R. Gojon, T. Jardin, H. Parisot-Dupuis, J. Moschetta\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/fluids9040096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid growth of drone use in urban areas has prompted authorities to review airspace regulations, forcing drone manufacturers to anticipate and reduce the noise emissions during the design stage. Additionally, micro air vehicles (MAVs) are designed to be aerodynamically efficient, allowing them to fly farther, longer and safer. In this study, a steady aerodynamic code and an acoustic propagator based on the non-linear vortex lattice method (NVLM) and Farassat’s formulation-1A of the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) acoustic analogy, respectively, are coupled with pymoo, a python-based optimization framework. This tool is used to perform a multi-objective (noise and aerodynamic efficiency) optimization of a 20 cm diameter two-bladed rotor under hovering conditions. From the set of optimized results, (i.e., the Pareto front), three different rotors are 3D-printed using a stereolithography (SLA) technique and tested in an anechoic room. Here, an array of far-field microphones captures the acoustic radiation and directivity of the rotor, while a balance measures the aerodynamic performance. Both the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of the three different rotors, in line with what has been predicted by the numerical codes, are compared and guidelines for the design of aerodynamically and aeroacoustically efficient MAV rotors are extracted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9040096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9040096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
无人机在城市地区的使用量迅速增长,促使有关部门审查空域法规,迫使无人机制造商在设计阶段就预测并减少噪音排放。此外,微型飞行器(MAVs)在设计上注重空气动力学效率,使其飞得更远、更长、更安全。在这项研究中,分别基于非线性涡流晶格法(NVLM)和 Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings(FW-H)声学类比的 Farassat 公式-1A 的稳定空气动力学代码和声学传播器与基于 python- 的优化框架 pymoo 相结合。该工具用于在悬停条件下对直径 20 厘米的双叶旋翼进行多目标(噪声和气动效率)优化。从优化结果集(即帕累托前沿)中,使用立体光刻(SLA)技术三维打印出三个不同的转子,并在消声室中进行测试。在这里,远场麦克风阵列捕捉转子的声辐射和指向性,而平衡器则测量空气动力性能。对三种不同旋翼的气动和气声性能进行了比较,结果与数值代码的预测结果一致,并得出了设计气动和气声效率高的无人飞行器旋翼的指导原则。
Analysis of MAV Rotors Optimized for Low Noise and Aerodynamic Efficiency with Operational Constraints
The rapid growth of drone use in urban areas has prompted authorities to review airspace regulations, forcing drone manufacturers to anticipate and reduce the noise emissions during the design stage. Additionally, micro air vehicles (MAVs) are designed to be aerodynamically efficient, allowing them to fly farther, longer and safer. In this study, a steady aerodynamic code and an acoustic propagator based on the non-linear vortex lattice method (NVLM) and Farassat’s formulation-1A of the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) acoustic analogy, respectively, are coupled with pymoo, a python-based optimization framework. This tool is used to perform a multi-objective (noise and aerodynamic efficiency) optimization of a 20 cm diameter two-bladed rotor under hovering conditions. From the set of optimized results, (i.e., the Pareto front), three different rotors are 3D-printed using a stereolithography (SLA) technique and tested in an anechoic room. Here, an array of far-field microphones captures the acoustic radiation and directivity of the rotor, while a balance measures the aerodynamic performance. Both the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of the three different rotors, in line with what has been predicted by the numerical codes, are compared and guidelines for the design of aerodynamically and aeroacoustically efficient MAV rotors are extracted.