从研究到蟑螂陷阱:家庭哮喘计划的实际考虑因素。

Natalie Talis, Nathaniel Lewis, Prakash Doraiswamy, Zhiyong Wu, Brittney Boakye
{"title":"从研究到蟑螂陷阱:家庭哮喘计划的实际考虑因素。","authors":"Natalie Talis, Nathaniel Lewis, Prakash Doraiswamy, Zhiyong Wu, Brittney Boakye","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nHome-based asthma interventions have a significant evidence base as an effective means to address moderate and severe breathing concerns triggered by home conditions. However, the literature lacks logistical and staffing considerations necessary to successfully implement such a program at a governmental level. This practice report and process evaluation outlines practical details and lessons learned during a healthy homes pilot, and how they were addressed in the design of a permanent program.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo inform the creation of a permanent home-based asthma intervention at the Alexandria Health Department (AHD) (City of Alexandria, Virginia) and understand the tools and resources necessary for success.\n\n\nINTERVENTION\nParticipating households received a health and environmental assessment, followed by cleaning supplies, relevant education, and referrals to partners for services. AHD staff tracked challenges and insights at each step of the intervention. At the end of the pilot, staff worked with the community to identify solutions and design a permanent program.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlthough the pilot model was constructed based on existing case studies, technical assistance from national experts, and guidance documents, the team still experienced challenges around recruitment, staff support, home visit implementation, and impact evaluation. While pilots and existing literature can be instructive for identifying issues, work with residents and partners to develop a uniquely tailored community program was essential for practical success.\n\n\nIMPLICATIONS ON POLICY AND PRACTICE\nHealth departments developing new initiatives should consider both the staff and participant experience throughout the creation of administrative and programmatic processes. Testing out draft versions of these processes and materials using internal and external focus groups can identify potential bottlenecks and solutions upfront.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"1 1","pages":"E94-E101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Research to Roach Traps: Practical Considerations for a Home-Based Asthma Program.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Talis, Nathaniel Lewis, Prakash Doraiswamy, Zhiyong Wu, Brittney Boakye\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nHome-based asthma interventions have a significant evidence base as an effective means to address moderate and severe breathing concerns triggered by home conditions. However, the literature lacks logistical and staffing considerations necessary to successfully implement such a program at a governmental level. This practice report and process evaluation outlines practical details and lessons learned during a healthy homes pilot, and how they were addressed in the design of a permanent program.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nTo inform the creation of a permanent home-based asthma intervention at the Alexandria Health Department (AHD) (City of Alexandria, Virginia) and understand the tools and resources necessary for success.\\n\\n\\nINTERVENTION\\nParticipating households received a health and environmental assessment, followed by cleaning supplies, relevant education, and referrals to partners for services. AHD staff tracked challenges and insights at each step of the intervention. At the end of the pilot, staff worked with the community to identify solutions and design a permanent program.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nAlthough the pilot model was constructed based on existing case studies, technical assistance from national experts, and guidance documents, the team still experienced challenges around recruitment, staff support, home visit implementation, and impact evaluation. While pilots and existing literature can be instructive for identifying issues, work with residents and partners to develop a uniquely tailored community program was essential for practical success.\\n\\n\\nIMPLICATIONS ON POLICY AND PRACTICE\\nHealth departments developing new initiatives should consider both the staff and participant experience throughout the creation of administrative and programmatic processes. Testing out draft versions of these processes and materials using internal and external focus groups can identify potential bottlenecks and solutions upfront.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"E94-E101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景以家庭为基础的哮喘干预措施作为解决由家庭条件引发的中度和重度呼吸问题的有效手段,已经有了大量的证据基础。然而,文献中缺乏在政府层面成功实施此类计划所需的后勤和人员配备方面的考虑。本实践报告和过程评估概述了健康家庭试点过程中的实际细节和经验教训,以及在设计永久性计划时如何处理这些细节和经验教训。目标为亚历山大卫生局(AHD)(弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市)建立永久性家庭哮喘干预措施提供信息,并了解成功所需的工具和资源。干预措施参与家庭接受健康和环境评估,随后获得清洁用品、相关教育以及合作伙伴服务转介。美国卫生与发展协会的工作人员对干预措施每一步所面临的挑战和见解进行了跟踪。结论虽然试点模式是在现有案例研究、国家专家的技术援助和指导文件的基础上构建的,但团队在招募、员工支持、家访实施和影响评估方面仍然遇到了挑战。虽然试点项目和现有文献对发现问题具有指导意义,但与居民和合作伙伴合作开发独特的社区项目对取得实际成功至关重要。利用内部和外部焦点小组测试这些流程和材料的草案版本,可以提前发现潜在的瓶颈和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Research to Roach Traps: Practical Considerations for a Home-Based Asthma Program.
CONTEXT Home-based asthma interventions have a significant evidence base as an effective means to address moderate and severe breathing concerns triggered by home conditions. However, the literature lacks logistical and staffing considerations necessary to successfully implement such a program at a governmental level. This practice report and process evaluation outlines practical details and lessons learned during a healthy homes pilot, and how they were addressed in the design of a permanent program. OBJECTIVE To inform the creation of a permanent home-based asthma intervention at the Alexandria Health Department (AHD) (City of Alexandria, Virginia) and understand the tools and resources necessary for success. INTERVENTION Participating households received a health and environmental assessment, followed by cleaning supplies, relevant education, and referrals to partners for services. AHD staff tracked challenges and insights at each step of the intervention. At the end of the pilot, staff worked with the community to identify solutions and design a permanent program. CONCLUSIONS Although the pilot model was constructed based on existing case studies, technical assistance from national experts, and guidance documents, the team still experienced challenges around recruitment, staff support, home visit implementation, and impact evaluation. While pilots and existing literature can be instructive for identifying issues, work with residents and partners to develop a uniquely tailored community program was essential for practical success. IMPLICATIONS ON POLICY AND PRACTICE Health departments developing new initiatives should consider both the staff and participant experience throughout the creation of administrative and programmatic processes. Testing out draft versions of these processes and materials using internal and external focus groups can identify potential bottlenecks and solutions upfront.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Northern Nevada Public Health: Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and Workforce Capacity Self-assessment Tools to Develop a Framework for Workforce Investment. Few Prison Systems Release Individual Death Data: Death in Custody Reporting Act Completeness, Speed, and Compliance. Faces of Local Public Health: Insights Across LHD Staff Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Gender From the 2022 National Profile of Local Health Departments. Commentary on Schneider et al., "Charting the Advocacy Landscape: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Syllabi in Public Health Graduate Education". Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1