公共卫生专业人员职业倦怠的普遍性:系统回顾。

Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, Analyn Cruz, Meng-Yung Ong, Ashley Chitanda, Yolisa Harvey, Jayden Hwang, Huma Shah, Shanalee Tamares, Lori Wilber
{"title":"公共卫生专业人员职业倦怠的普遍性:系统回顾。","authors":"Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, Analyn Cruz, Meng-Yung Ong, Ashley Chitanda, Yolisa Harvey, Jayden Hwang, Huma Shah, Shanalee Tamares, Lori Wilber","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nSince the initial outbreak of COVID-19, health professionals-both clinical health care, as well as public health concentrations-have faced tremendous pressures. A growing body of literature indicates the pandemic has magnified already prevalent burnout rates among clinical health professionals and to what extent for public health professionals remains to be determined.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThis study purpose is to conduct a systematic review of literature examining burnout prevalence among public health professionals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic-nationally and internationally-with identification of potential risk factors.\n\n\nDESIGN\nWe conducted a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and ClinicalKey since inception through April 4, 2023. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed, original research studies (qualitative or quantitative), in English, assessing prevalence of, or risk factors for, burnout in public health professionals. Two authors independently screened abstracts, titles, full report of studies and abstracted data related to burnout. This review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute Systematic Reviews guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines with narrative synthesis. Protocol for this review registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023424468).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 3327 health-related articles mentioning burnout, 15 met inclusion criteria (11 quantitative and 4 qualitative) with 10 in international settings and 5 in US majority of quantitative studies were from international settings and only 1 in United States. Seventy-eight percent of studies that included prevalence data, exhibited a burnout prevalence greater than 50% (with a range of 19%-81%). The pandemic likely heightened (13% increase) already elevated burnout prevalence. Major risk factors identified included overwork, lack of support, changing roles, and full-time employment status, though many risk factors had not been studied in the United States.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBurnout is prevalent among public health professionals, nationally and internationally, and likely heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic. More research is warranted assessing burnout among differing public health concentrations and interventions developed. Public health is an essential framework for protecting and promoting health nationally and internationally, and we need to ensure and support solidity of that framework.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"2000 20","pages":"384-393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Burnout Among Public Health Professionals: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, Analyn Cruz, Meng-Yung Ong, Ashley Chitanda, Yolisa Harvey, Jayden Hwang, Huma Shah, Shanalee Tamares, Lori Wilber\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nSince the initial outbreak of COVID-19, health professionals-both clinical health care, as well as public health concentrations-have faced tremendous pressures. A growing body of literature indicates the pandemic has magnified already prevalent burnout rates among clinical health professionals and to what extent for public health professionals remains to be determined.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nThis study purpose is to conduct a systematic review of literature examining burnout prevalence among public health professionals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic-nationally and internationally-with identification of potential risk factors.\\n\\n\\nDESIGN\\nWe conducted a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and ClinicalKey since inception through April 4, 2023. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed, original research studies (qualitative or quantitative), in English, assessing prevalence of, or risk factors for, burnout in public health professionals. Two authors independently screened abstracts, titles, full report of studies and abstracted data related to burnout. This review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute Systematic Reviews guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines with narrative synthesis. Protocol for this review registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023424468).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOf 3327 health-related articles mentioning burnout, 15 met inclusion criteria (11 quantitative and 4 qualitative) with 10 in international settings and 5 in US majority of quantitative studies were from international settings and only 1 in United States. Seventy-eight percent of studies that included prevalence data, exhibited a burnout prevalence greater than 50% (with a range of 19%-81%). The pandemic likely heightened (13% increase) already elevated burnout prevalence. Major risk factors identified included overwork, lack of support, changing roles, and full-time employment status, though many risk factors had not been studied in the United States.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nBurnout is prevalent among public health professionals, nationally and internationally, and likely heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic. More research is warranted assessing burnout among differing public health concentrations and interventions developed. Public health is an essential framework for protecting and promoting health nationally and internationally, and we need to ensure and support solidity of that framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"volume\":\"2000 20\",\"pages\":\"384-393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景自 COVID-19 最初爆发以来,医疗专业人员--无论是临床医疗人员还是公共卫生专业人员--都面临着巨大的压力。越来越多的文献表明,疫情扩大了临床医疗专业人员本已普遍存在的职业倦怠率,而公共卫生专业人员的倦怠程度如何仍有待确定。本研究的目的是对文献进行系统性综述,研究 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间公共卫生专业人员的职业倦怠率--国内和国际--并确定潜在的风险因素。纳入标准包括经同行评审的、评估公共卫生专业人员职业倦怠发生率或风险因素的英文原创研究(定性或定量)。两位作者独立筛选了摘要、标题、研究报告全文以及与职业倦怠相关的摘要数据。本综述采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所系统性综述指南和系统性综述和元分析首选报告项目指南进行叙述性综合。结果 在 3327 篇提及职业倦怠的健康相关文章中,有 15 篇符合纳入标准(11 篇定量研究和 4 篇定性研究),其中 10 篇来自国际环境,5 篇来自美国,大部分定量研究来自国际环境,只有 1 篇来自美国。在包含倦怠发生率数据的研究中,78%的研究显示倦怠发生率超过 50%(范围为 19%-81%)。大流行病可能加剧了(增加了 13%)本已升高的职业倦怠流行率。已确定的主要风险因素包括工作过度、缺乏支持、角色变化和全职就业状况,但许多风险因素尚未在美国进行过研究。有必要开展更多的研究,评估不同公共卫生专业人员的职业倦怠情况,并制定干预措施。公共卫生是在国内和国际上保护和促进健康的重要框架,我们需要确保和支持这一框架的稳固性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of Burnout Among Public Health Professionals: A Systematic Review.
CONTEXT Since the initial outbreak of COVID-19, health professionals-both clinical health care, as well as public health concentrations-have faced tremendous pressures. A growing body of literature indicates the pandemic has magnified already prevalent burnout rates among clinical health professionals and to what extent for public health professionals remains to be determined. OBJECTIVE This study purpose is to conduct a systematic review of literature examining burnout prevalence among public health professionals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic-nationally and internationally-with identification of potential risk factors. DESIGN We conducted a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and ClinicalKey since inception through April 4, 2023. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed, original research studies (qualitative or quantitative), in English, assessing prevalence of, or risk factors for, burnout in public health professionals. Two authors independently screened abstracts, titles, full report of studies and abstracted data related to burnout. This review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute Systematic Reviews guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines with narrative synthesis. Protocol for this review registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023424468). RESULTS Of 3327 health-related articles mentioning burnout, 15 met inclusion criteria (11 quantitative and 4 qualitative) with 10 in international settings and 5 in US majority of quantitative studies were from international settings and only 1 in United States. Seventy-eight percent of studies that included prevalence data, exhibited a burnout prevalence greater than 50% (with a range of 19%-81%). The pandemic likely heightened (13% increase) already elevated burnout prevalence. Major risk factors identified included overwork, lack of support, changing roles, and full-time employment status, though many risk factors had not been studied in the United States. CONCLUSIONS Burnout is prevalent among public health professionals, nationally and internationally, and likely heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic. More research is warranted assessing burnout among differing public health concentrations and interventions developed. Public health is an essential framework for protecting and promoting health nationally and internationally, and we need to ensure and support solidity of that framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Northern Nevada Public Health: Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and Workforce Capacity Self-assessment Tools to Develop a Framework for Workforce Investment. Few Prison Systems Release Individual Death Data: Death in Custody Reporting Act Completeness, Speed, and Compliance. Faces of Local Public Health: Insights Across LHD Staff Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Gender From the 2022 National Profile of Local Health Departments. Commentary on Schneider et al., "Charting the Advocacy Landscape: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Syllabi in Public Health Graduate Education". Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1