欧洲国家的出租车法规及其对用户体验的影响

Niklas Astala, Ville Valtonen
{"title":"欧洲国家的出租车法规及其对用户体验的影响","authors":"Niklas Astala, Ville Valtonen","doi":"10.58956/liikenne.144792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe taxi industry is one of the few industries where quantities and maximum fare prices are still strictly controlled. However, even though large-scale shifts in regulatory structures are happening across the world, the impacts of these changes are still largely unknown. The aim of this article was to get a narrow picture of the potential effects of deregulation of the taxi industry in a European context by investigating and comparing the observed effects in two European capitals. When talking about the taxi industry, we refer to the “traditional” European taxis, meaning that digital taxi services such as Uber, Bolt etc. are excluded. The article provides an overview of the background to the regulation of the taxi industry and the most common justifications of regulation. According to the findings, deregulations of the taxi markets can have varied results even in cities with very similar regulatory structures and no specific framework for effects caused by deregulation could be made. However, the contention of whether taxi regulations are beneficial mainly focuses around quantitative and economic regulations. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":518219,"journal":{"name":"Liikenne-vuosikirja","volume":"16 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxi Regulation and Its Impact on User Experience in European Countries\",\"authors\":\"Niklas Astala, Ville Valtonen\",\"doi\":\"10.58956/liikenne.144792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThe taxi industry is one of the few industries where quantities and maximum fare prices are still strictly controlled. However, even though large-scale shifts in regulatory structures are happening across the world, the impacts of these changes are still largely unknown. The aim of this article was to get a narrow picture of the potential effects of deregulation of the taxi industry in a European context by investigating and comparing the observed effects in two European capitals. When talking about the taxi industry, we refer to the “traditional” European taxis, meaning that digital taxi services such as Uber, Bolt etc. are excluded. The article provides an overview of the background to the regulation of the taxi industry and the most common justifications of regulation. According to the findings, deregulations of the taxi markets can have varied results even in cities with very similar regulatory structures and no specific framework for effects caused by deregulation could be made. However, the contention of whether taxi regulations are beneficial mainly focuses around quantitative and economic regulations. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":518219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liikenne-vuosikirja\",\"volume\":\"16 28\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liikenne-vuosikirja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58956/liikenne.144792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liikenne-vuosikirja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58956/liikenne.144792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

出租车行业是少数几个仍然严格控制数量和最高票价的行业之一。然而,尽管监管结构正在全球范围内发生大规模变化,但这些变化的影响在很大程度上仍不为人所知。本文旨在通过调查和比较在两个欧洲国家首都观察到的影响,了解在欧洲范围内放松对出租车行业管制的潜在影响。在谈到出租车行业时,我们指的是 "传统的 "欧洲出租车,即不包括 Uber、Bolt 等数字出租车服务。文章概述了出租车行业监管的背景以及最常见的监管理由。研究结果表明,即使在监管结构非常相似的城市,放松对出租车市场的监管也会产生不同的结果,因此无法就放松监管所产生的影响制定具体的框架。然而,关于出租车监管是否有益的争论主要集中在数量和经济监管方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taxi Regulation and Its Impact on User Experience in European Countries
The taxi industry is one of the few industries where quantities and maximum fare prices are still strictly controlled. However, even though large-scale shifts in regulatory structures are happening across the world, the impacts of these changes are still largely unknown. The aim of this article was to get a narrow picture of the potential effects of deregulation of the taxi industry in a European context by investigating and comparing the observed effects in two European capitals. When talking about the taxi industry, we refer to the “traditional” European taxis, meaning that digital taxi services such as Uber, Bolt etc. are excluded. The article provides an overview of the background to the regulation of the taxi industry and the most common justifications of regulation. According to the findings, deregulations of the taxi markets can have varied results even in cities with very similar regulatory structures and no specific framework for effects caused by deregulation could be made. However, the contention of whether taxi regulations are beneficial mainly focuses around quantitative and economic regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liikenne 2022 Taxi Regulation and Its Impact on User Experience in European Countries Built environment and self-selection of residential location in the context of US-American cities Impact of weather on bicycle use Relationships Between Weather and Cycling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1