为糖尿病患者开发符合其文化背景的技能和知识评估工具及其可接受性

IF 4.2 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100346
Stephanie Hakimian , Susan Karam , Kim Pardilla , Kasey Coyne , Emilie K. Touma , Diane Larsen , Jane L. Holl , Amisha Wallia
{"title":"为糖尿病患者开发符合其文化背景的技能和知识评估工具及其可接受性","authors":"Stephanie Hakimian ,&nbsp;Susan Karam ,&nbsp;Kim Pardilla ,&nbsp;Kasey Coyne ,&nbsp;Emilie K. Touma ,&nbsp;Diane Larsen ,&nbsp;Jane L. Holl ,&nbsp;Amisha Wallia","doi":"10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and newly prescribed insulin need to learn essential self-care and management skills quickly. To optimize teaching, clinicians need to assess a patient’s basic understanding of DM and their skills. While DM patient assessments exist, this study reports the development of an assessment of patient DM management skills and knowledge, using feedback from DM clinicians, patients, and caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Research Design and Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of Pubmed/Medline and Scopus (1980–2017) of DM knowledge assessments was performed. Twenty-four studies were identified. Content from the existing assessments was adapted to create a 12 item DM-Skills Knowledge Assessment (SKA) to assess a patient’s DM management skills and knowledge. To assess cultural humility, modified cognitive interviews were conducted in individual user sessions and semi-structured focus groups. Audio-transcripts of the interviews/focus groups were independently coded, and codes were grouped into key themes. Participant demographic characteristics were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five focus groups and eleven key informant interviews were conducted, including 10 DM clinicians, 12 patients/caregivers, and 15 laypersons. All 10 clinicians reported that the DM-SKA addresses the key domains of DM education deemed to be of highest importance during the transition from hospital to home and that their patients would be willing to complete the assessment. More than half of the patient/caregiver/layperson participants self-reported race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white and performed similarly to non-Hispanic white participants in understanding each item, willingness to complete the DM-SKA, and perception that family or community members would be willing to complete the DM-SKA. The DM-SKA has a baseline Flesch reading score of 81.3, indicating low complexity language.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DM clinicians agreed that the DM-SKA assesses all essential DM management skills. For patients/caregivers, it has acceptable literacy, cognitive validity, and culturally acceptable for racial/ethnic minority populations in the study, including elderly persons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623724000176/pdfft?md5=d39e54ecec04fe73442e0286ba3b827b&pid=1-s2.0-S2214623724000176-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and acceptability of a culturally competent skills and knowledge assessment tool for patients with diabetes mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Hakimian ,&nbsp;Susan Karam ,&nbsp;Kim Pardilla ,&nbsp;Kasey Coyne ,&nbsp;Emilie K. Touma ,&nbsp;Diane Larsen ,&nbsp;Jane L. Holl ,&nbsp;Amisha Wallia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and newly prescribed insulin need to learn essential self-care and management skills quickly. To optimize teaching, clinicians need to assess a patient’s basic understanding of DM and their skills. While DM patient assessments exist, this study reports the development of an assessment of patient DM management skills and knowledge, using feedback from DM clinicians, patients, and caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Research Design and Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of Pubmed/Medline and Scopus (1980–2017) of DM knowledge assessments was performed. Twenty-four studies were identified. Content from the existing assessments was adapted to create a 12 item DM-Skills Knowledge Assessment (SKA) to assess a patient’s DM management skills and knowledge. To assess cultural humility, modified cognitive interviews were conducted in individual user sessions and semi-structured focus groups. Audio-transcripts of the interviews/focus groups were independently coded, and codes were grouped into key themes. Participant demographic characteristics were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five focus groups and eleven key informant interviews were conducted, including 10 DM clinicians, 12 patients/caregivers, and 15 laypersons. All 10 clinicians reported that the DM-SKA addresses the key domains of DM education deemed to be of highest importance during the transition from hospital to home and that their patients would be willing to complete the assessment. More than half of the patient/caregiver/layperson participants self-reported race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white and performed similarly to non-Hispanic white participants in understanding each item, willingness to complete the DM-SKA, and perception that family or community members would be willing to complete the DM-SKA. The DM-SKA has a baseline Flesch reading score of 81.3, indicating low complexity language.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DM clinicians agreed that the DM-SKA assesses all essential DM management skills. For patients/caregivers, it has acceptable literacy, cognitive validity, and culturally acceptable for racial/ethnic minority populations in the study, including elderly persons.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623724000176/pdfft?md5=d39e54ecec04fe73442e0286ba3b827b&pid=1-s2.0-S2214623724000176-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623724000176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623724000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景新确诊为 2 型糖尿病(DM)和新开胰岛素处方的患者需要尽快掌握基本的自我护理和管理技能。为了优化教学,临床医生需要评估患者对 DM 的基本理解及其技能。虽然DM患者评估已经存在,但本研究报告利用来自DM临床医生、患者和护理人员的反馈,对患者的DM管理技能和知识进行了评估。研究设计和方法对Pubmed/Medline和Scopus(1980-2017年)上的DM知识评估进行了系统检索。确定了 24 项研究。对现有评估内容进行了改编,创建了12个项目的DM技能知识评估(SKA),以评估患者的DM管理技能和知识。为了评估文化谦逊度,在用户个人会议和半结构化焦点小组中进行了修改后的认知访谈。对访谈/焦点小组的录音记录进行独立编码,并将编码归纳为关键主题。对参与者的人口统计学特征进行了评估。结果进行了五个焦点小组和十一次关键信息提供者访谈,其中包括 10 名 DM 临床医生、12 名患者/护理人员和 15 名非专业人士。所有 10 位临床医生都表示,DM-SKA 涉及了从医院到家庭过渡期间最重要的 DM 教育关键领域,而且他们的患者愿意完成评估。半数以上的患者/护理人员/陪护人员自称是非西班牙裔白人以外的种族/族裔,他们在理解每个项目、愿意完成 DM-SKA 以及认为家人或社区成员愿意完成 DM-SKA 方面的表现与非西班牙裔白人相似。DM-SKA的基线Flesch阅读分数为81.3分,表明语言复杂程度较低。结论DM临床医生一致认为DM-SKA评估了所有基本的DM管理技能。对于患者/护理人员来说,DM-SKA具有可接受的读写能力和认知有效性,并且在文化上可被研究中的少数种族/民族人群(包括老年人)接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and acceptability of a culturally competent skills and knowledge assessment tool for patients with diabetes mellitus

Background

Patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and newly prescribed insulin need to learn essential self-care and management skills quickly. To optimize teaching, clinicians need to assess a patient’s basic understanding of DM and their skills. While DM patient assessments exist, this study reports the development of an assessment of patient DM management skills and knowledge, using feedback from DM clinicians, patients, and caregivers.

Research Design and Methods

A systematic search of Pubmed/Medline and Scopus (1980–2017) of DM knowledge assessments was performed. Twenty-four studies were identified. Content from the existing assessments was adapted to create a 12 item DM-Skills Knowledge Assessment (SKA) to assess a patient’s DM management skills and knowledge. To assess cultural humility, modified cognitive interviews were conducted in individual user sessions and semi-structured focus groups. Audio-transcripts of the interviews/focus groups were independently coded, and codes were grouped into key themes. Participant demographic characteristics were assessed.

Results

Five focus groups and eleven key informant interviews were conducted, including 10 DM clinicians, 12 patients/caregivers, and 15 laypersons. All 10 clinicians reported that the DM-SKA addresses the key domains of DM education deemed to be of highest importance during the transition from hospital to home and that their patients would be willing to complete the assessment. More than half of the patient/caregiver/layperson participants self-reported race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white and performed similarly to non-Hispanic white participants in understanding each item, willingness to complete the DM-SKA, and perception that family or community members would be willing to complete the DM-SKA. The DM-SKA has a baseline Flesch reading score of 81.3, indicating low complexity language.

Conclusion

DM clinicians agreed that the DM-SKA assesses all essential DM management skills. For patients/caregivers, it has acceptable literacy, cognitive validity, and culturally acceptable for racial/ethnic minority populations in the study, including elderly persons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Eating habits and carotenoid skin content among children based on their attendance at the school meals: A cross-sectional pilot study Glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonist treatment of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes complicated by obesity: A cases series and literature review The bio-artificial pancreas to treat type 1 diabetes: Perspectives from healthcare professionals in the Netherlands Clinical characteristics of Ketosis Prone Diabetes: Evaluating diagnosis and management practices in a real-life setting Association between incretin-based drugs and risk of cholangiocarcinoma among patients with type 2 diabetes: A large population-based matched cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1