[医疗中心质量单位达标综合指标和多中心前瞻性试点研究]。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.03.007
A. Aloy-Duch , M. Santiñà Vila , F. Ramos-d’Angelo , L. Alonso Calo , M.E. Llaneza-Velasco , B. Fortuny-Organs , A. Apezetxea-Celaya
{"title":"[医疗中心质量单位达标综合指标和多中心前瞻性试点研究]。","authors":"A. Aloy-Duch ,&nbsp;M. Santiñà Vila ,&nbsp;F. Ramos-d’Angelo ,&nbsp;L. Alonso Calo ,&nbsp;M.E. Llaneza-Velasco ,&nbsp;B. Fortuny-Organs ,&nbsp;A. Apezetxea-Celaya","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>In Spain, Quality Units play a key and unique role in advising healthcare centers on the methodology of healthcare quality. The objectives of the study were to develop computer algorithms to obtain a synthetic indicator of standard compliance for Quality Units and to pilot its functioning in these units.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The Excel program was used to establish evaluation algorithms, and quantitatively interrelate and weight various categories of standards, as a computer evaluation tool, to build a continuous improvement cycle system, and offer a global synthetic indicator of compliance. The tool was tested in a prospective multicenter pilot study, in which coordinators of Quality Units from different health centers and care settings participated, to evaluate the usefulness of the tool and compliance with the standards, in addition to analyzing the content validity of each standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The formulas for the structured computer algorithms were developed, consecutively, in a «PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT» improvement cycle for the 9 categories of standards, resulting in a single synthetic indicator of compliance. Twenty-one Quality Units participated in the piloting. The overall average compliance rate for the synthetic indicator was 55.63% with differences between centers (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002) and between categories (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.0001), but not by autonomous communities (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.86) or by areas (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.97). Content validity was ensured through the variable of «understanding» of the standards (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001), and through their «justification» with documentary evidence (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The computer tool with the synthetic indicator have allowed for the evaluation of standard compliance in Quality Units of healthcare centers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicador sintético de cumplimiento de estándares para Unidades de Calidad de centros sanitarios y estudio de pilotaje prospectivo multicéntrico\",\"authors\":\"A. Aloy-Duch ,&nbsp;M. Santiñà Vila ,&nbsp;F. Ramos-d’Angelo ,&nbsp;L. Alonso Calo ,&nbsp;M.E. Llaneza-Velasco ,&nbsp;B. Fortuny-Organs ,&nbsp;A. Apezetxea-Celaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>In Spain, Quality Units play a key and unique role in advising healthcare centers on the methodology of healthcare quality. The objectives of the study were to develop computer algorithms to obtain a synthetic indicator of standard compliance for Quality Units and to pilot its functioning in these units.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The Excel program was used to establish evaluation algorithms, and quantitatively interrelate and weight various categories of standards, as a computer evaluation tool, to build a continuous improvement cycle system, and offer a global synthetic indicator of compliance. The tool was tested in a prospective multicenter pilot study, in which coordinators of Quality Units from different health centers and care settings participated, to evaluate the usefulness of the tool and compliance with the standards, in addition to analyzing the content validity of each standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The formulas for the structured computer algorithms were developed, consecutively, in a «PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT» improvement cycle for the 9 categories of standards, resulting in a single synthetic indicator of compliance. Twenty-one Quality Units participated in the piloting. The overall average compliance rate for the synthetic indicator was 55.63% with differences between centers (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002) and between categories (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.0001), but not by autonomous communities (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.86) or by areas (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.97). Content validity was ensured through the variable of «understanding» of the standards (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001), and through their «justification» with documentary evidence (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The computer tool with the synthetic indicator have allowed for the evaluation of standard compliance in Quality Units of healthcare centers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的在西班牙,质量单位在为医疗中心提供医疗质量方法建议方面发挥着关键而独特的作用。这项研究的目的是开发计算机算法,以获得质量单位标准符合性的合成指标,并在这些单位中试行。材料和方法使用 Excel 程序建立评估算法,对各类标准进行定量关联和加权,作为计算机评估工具,建立持续改进循环系统,并提供符合性的全球合成指标。该工具在一项前瞻性多中心试点研究中进行了测试,来自不同医疗中心和医疗机构的质量单位协调员参加了测试,除了分析每项标准的内容有效性外,还评估了该工具的实用性和标准的合规性。结果在 "计划-执行-检查-行动 "的改进周期中,针对 9 类标准连续开发了结构化计算机算法公式,从而形成了一个单一的合规性合成指标。21 个质量单位参加了试点工作。合成指标的总体平均达标率为 55.63%,不同中心(P = .002)和不同类别(P < .0001)之间存在差异,但不同自治区(P = .86)或不同地区(P = .97)之间不存在差异。通过对标准的 "理解 "变量(P <.001)以及通过文件证据对标准的 "解释 "变量(P <.001),确保了内容的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indicador sintético de cumplimiento de estándares para Unidades de Calidad de centros sanitarios y estudio de pilotaje prospectivo multicéntrico

Background and objective

In Spain, Quality Units play a key and unique role in advising healthcare centers on the methodology of healthcare quality. The objectives of the study were to develop computer algorithms to obtain a synthetic indicator of standard compliance for Quality Units and to pilot its functioning in these units.

Materials and methods

The Excel program was used to establish evaluation algorithms, and quantitatively interrelate and weight various categories of standards, as a computer evaluation tool, to build a continuous improvement cycle system, and offer a global synthetic indicator of compliance. The tool was tested in a prospective multicenter pilot study, in which coordinators of Quality Units from different health centers and care settings participated, to evaluate the usefulness of the tool and compliance with the standards, in addition to analyzing the content validity of each standard.

Results

The formulas for the structured computer algorithms were developed, consecutively, in a «PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT» improvement cycle for the 9 categories of standards, resulting in a single synthetic indicator of compliance. Twenty-one Quality Units participated in the piloting. The overall average compliance rate for the synthetic indicator was 55.63% with differences between centers (P = .002) and between categories (P < .0001), but not by autonomous communities (P = .86) or by areas (P = .97). Content validity was ensured through the variable of «understanding» of the standards (P < .001), and through their «justification» with documentary evidence (P < .001).

Conclusions

The computer tool with the synthetic indicator have allowed for the evaluation of standard compliance in Quality Units of healthcare centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia]. Analysis of quality of life of patients with refractive errors in India. A propósito de una encuesta sobre riesgos de la enfermedad de Chagas Utilidad del instrumento AGREE para la elaboración y la evaluación de protocolos clínicos: de la teoría a la práctica clínica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1