环境色光对使用两台口内扫描仪记录的全牙弓种植体扫描精度的影响。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.030
Gastón Ochoa-López DDS, MSD , Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD , Miguel Gómez-Polo DDS, PhD
{"title":"环境色光对使用两台口内扫描仪记录的全牙弓种植体扫描精度的影响。","authors":"Gastón Ochoa-López DDS, MSD ,&nbsp;Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD ,&nbsp;Miguel Gómez-Polo DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The influence of different ambient factors including lighting has been previously studied. However, the influence of ambient color lighting settings on intraoral scanning accuracy remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using 2 intraoral scanners (IOSs).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An edentulous maxillary cast with 6 implant scan bodies was digitized by using a laboratory scanner (DW-7–140) to obtain a reference file. Two groups were created based on the IOS tested: TRIOS 4 (IOS-1) and i700 (IOS-2). Seven subgroups were developed depending on the ambient color lighting (red, green, blue, yellow, cyan, magenta, and white) (n=15). Scanning accuracy was analyzed by using a metrology software program (Geomagic Control X). The Kruskal-Wallis, 1-way ANOVA, and pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the data (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant trueness and precision values were found across the groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) and subgroups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). For IOS-1, blue ambient lighting obtained the best trueness (19.8 ±1.8 µm) (<em>P</em>&lt;.05); in precision, white light (20.8 ±7.3 µm) and blue light (22.1 ±13.5) showed the best results (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). For IOS-2, white light showed the best trueness (51.9 ±16.7 µm); the best precision was obtained under magenta (38.6 ±10.4 µm) and yellow light (52.6 ±24.0 µm) (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The optimal ambient color lighting varied between the IOSs assessed. As the best condition for maximizing accuracy was not found, ambient color lighting must be individualized for the IOS system used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 2","pages":"Pages 552-559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using two intraoral scanners\",\"authors\":\"Gastón Ochoa-López DDS, MSD ,&nbsp;Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD ,&nbsp;Miguel Gómez-Polo DDS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The influence of different ambient factors including lighting has been previously studied. However, the influence of ambient color lighting settings on intraoral scanning accuracy remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using 2 intraoral scanners (IOSs).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An edentulous maxillary cast with 6 implant scan bodies was digitized by using a laboratory scanner (DW-7–140) to obtain a reference file. Two groups were created based on the IOS tested: TRIOS 4 (IOS-1) and i700 (IOS-2). Seven subgroups were developed depending on the ambient color lighting (red, green, blue, yellow, cyan, magenta, and white) (n=15). Scanning accuracy was analyzed by using a metrology software program (Geomagic Control X). The Kruskal-Wallis, 1-way ANOVA, and pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the data (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant trueness and precision values were found across the groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) and subgroups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). For IOS-1, blue ambient lighting obtained the best trueness (19.8 ±1.8 µm) (<em>P</em>&lt;.05); in precision, white light (20.8 ±7.3 µm) and blue light (22.1 ±13.5) showed the best results (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). For IOS-2, white light showed the best trueness (51.9 ±16.7 µm); the best precision was obtained under magenta (38.6 ±10.4 µm) and yellow light (52.6 ±24.0 µm) (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The optimal ambient color lighting varied between the IOSs assessed. As the best condition for maximizing accuracy was not found, ambient color lighting must be individualized for the IOS system used.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"133 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 552-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324002245\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324002245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of the ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using two intraoral scanners

Statement of problem

The influence of different ambient factors including lighting has been previously studied. However, the influence of ambient color lighting settings on intraoral scanning accuracy remains uncertain.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using 2 intraoral scanners (IOSs).

Material and methods

An edentulous maxillary cast with 6 implant scan bodies was digitized by using a laboratory scanner (DW-7–140) to obtain a reference file. Two groups were created based on the IOS tested: TRIOS 4 (IOS-1) and i700 (IOS-2). Seven subgroups were developed depending on the ambient color lighting (red, green, blue, yellow, cyan, magenta, and white) (n=15). Scanning accuracy was analyzed by using a metrology software program (Geomagic Control X). The Kruskal-Wallis, 1-way ANOVA, and pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the data (α=.05).

Results

Significant trueness and precision values were found across the groups (P<.05) and subgroups (P<.05). For IOS-1, blue ambient lighting obtained the best trueness (19.8 ±1.8 µm) (P<.05); in precision, white light (20.8 ±7.3 µm) and blue light (22.1 ±13.5) showed the best results (P<.05). For IOS-2, white light showed the best trueness (51.9 ±16.7 µm); the best precision was obtained under magenta (38.6 ±10.4 µm) and yellow light (52.6 ±24.0 µm) (P<.05).

Conclusions

The optimal ambient color lighting varied between the IOSs assessed. As the best condition for maximizing accuracy was not found, ambient color lighting must be individualized for the IOS system used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using intraoral and extraoral photogrammetry systems. A meta-analysis of the accuracy of different measuring techniques to evaluate the marginal and internal gap of a fixed dental prosthesis: The American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics, Research in Fixed Prosthodontics Committee. Accuracy of registration between digitized extraoral scan bodies and virtual casts: Effect of the edentulous area, tooth anatomy, and registration method. An AI-based tool for prosthetic crown segmentation serving automated intraoral scan-to-CBCT registration in challenging high artifact scenarios. Comparison of scanning depth in widened root canals: An analysis of three intraoral scanners and two scanning techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1