阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症与 QT 间期的关系:荟萃分析

IF 2.2 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1002/agm2.12291
Simon W. Rabkin
{"title":"阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症与 QT 间期的关系:荟萃分析","authors":"Simon W. Rabkin","doi":"10.1002/agm2.12291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While the link between aging and mortality from dementia is widely appreciated, the mechanism is not clear. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a direct relationship between Alzheimer dementia (AD) and the QT interval, because the latter has been related to cardiac mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted after a Medline and EMBASE search using terms “Alzheimer disease or Dementia AND QT interval, QT dispersion or cardiac repolarization.” Four studies with control groups were identified. There were significant differences in QT interval between individuals with AD vs individuals without dementia (controls) (odds ratio (OR)1.665 [random effects model] and 1.879 [fixed effect model]) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were significant differences in QT interval between individuals with AD vs individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (OR 1.760 [random effects] and 1.810 [fixed effect]) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A significant (<i>p</i> &lt;0.001) correlation exists between the QTc and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), a test of cognitive function. Two studies examined QT variability (the difference between the longest and shortest QT interval on a 12 lead ECG); the OR for QT variability AD vs MCI was 3.858 [random effects model] and 3.712 [fixed effects model] (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). When compared to the control group, the OR for QT dispersion in AD was 6.358 [random effects model] or 5.143 ( <i>P</i>&lt; 0.001) [fixed effects model]. A qualitative analysis of the data raised questions about paucity of data defining the nature of the control groups, the pathophysiologic mechanism, and the uniform use of a poor QT heart rate correction factor. The longer QT in AD, greater QT variability in AD, and the direct relationship between QT interval and AD severity supports a brain–heart connection in AD that might be fundamental to aging-induced AD and mortality. Issues with defining the control group, limited number of studies, conflicting data in population studies, and the lack of a strong electrophysiological basis underscore the need for additional research in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":32862,"journal":{"name":"Aging Medicine","volume":"7 2","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agm2.12291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between Alzheimer dementia and QT interval: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Simon W. Rabkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agm2.12291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While the link between aging and mortality from dementia is widely appreciated, the mechanism is not clear. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a direct relationship between Alzheimer dementia (AD) and the QT interval, because the latter has been related to cardiac mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted after a Medline and EMBASE search using terms “Alzheimer disease or Dementia AND QT interval, QT dispersion or cardiac repolarization.” Four studies with control groups were identified. There were significant differences in QT interval between individuals with AD vs individuals without dementia (controls) (odds ratio (OR)1.665 [random effects model] and 1.879 [fixed effect model]) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were significant differences in QT interval between individuals with AD vs individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (OR 1.760 [random effects] and 1.810 [fixed effect]) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A significant (<i>p</i> &lt;0.001) correlation exists between the QTc and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), a test of cognitive function. Two studies examined QT variability (the difference between the longest and shortest QT interval on a 12 lead ECG); the OR for QT variability AD vs MCI was 3.858 [random effects model] and 3.712 [fixed effects model] (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). When compared to the control group, the OR for QT dispersion in AD was 6.358 [random effects model] or 5.143 ( <i>P</i>&lt; 0.001) [fixed effects model]. A qualitative analysis of the data raised questions about paucity of data defining the nature of the control groups, the pathophysiologic mechanism, and the uniform use of a poor QT heart rate correction factor. The longer QT in AD, greater QT variability in AD, and the direct relationship between QT interval and AD severity supports a brain–heart connection in AD that might be fundamental to aging-induced AD and mortality. Issues with defining the control group, limited number of studies, conflicting data in population studies, and the lack of a strong electrophysiological basis underscore the need for additional research in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"214-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agm2.12291\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agm2.12291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agm2.12291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然衰老与痴呆症死亡率之间的联系已得到广泛重视,但其机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定阿尔茨海默痴呆症(AD)与 QT 间期之间是否存在直接关系,因为后者与心脏病死亡率有关。在使用 "阿尔茨海默病或痴呆症与 QT 间期、QT 弥散或心脏复极化 "等术语对 Medline 和 EMBASE 进行检索后,进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。确定了四项有对照组的研究。阿兹海默症患者与非痴呆症患者(对照组)的 QT 间期存在明显差异(几率比(OR)1.665 [随机效应模型] 和 1.879 [固定效应模型])(P < 0.001)。AD患者与轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的QT间期存在明显差异(OR 1.760 [随机效应]和1.810 [固定效应])(p < 0.001)。QTc与认知功能测试 "迷你精神状态测验"(MMSE)之间存在明显的相关性(p <0.001)。有两项研究检测了 QT 变异性(12 导联心电图上最长和最短 QT 间期之差);QT 变异性 AD vs MCI 的 OR 值分别为 3.858 [随机效应模型] 和 3.712 [固定效应模型](p < 0.001)。与对照组相比,AD QT 离散度的 OR 值为 6.358 [随机效应模型] 或 5.143 ( P< 0.001) [固定效应模型]。对数据的定性分析提出了一些问题,如界定对照组性质的数据不足、病理生理机制以及统一使用不良 QT 心率校正因子等。AD患者的QT更长、QT变异性更大以及QT间期与AD严重程度之间的直接关系支持了AD患者的脑心联系,这可能是导致AD衰老和死亡的根本原因。对照组的定义、有限的研究数量、人群研究中相互矛盾的数据以及缺乏强有力的电生理学基础等问题强调了在这一领域开展更多研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between Alzheimer dementia and QT interval: A meta-analysis

While the link between aging and mortality from dementia is widely appreciated, the mechanism is not clear. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a direct relationship between Alzheimer dementia (AD) and the QT interval, because the latter has been related to cardiac mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted after a Medline and EMBASE search using terms “Alzheimer disease or Dementia AND QT interval, QT dispersion or cardiac repolarization.” Four studies with control groups were identified. There were significant differences in QT interval between individuals with AD vs individuals without dementia (controls) (odds ratio (OR)1.665 [random effects model] and 1.879 [fixed effect model]) (p < 0.001). There were significant differences in QT interval between individuals with AD vs individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (OR 1.760 [random effects] and 1.810 [fixed effect]) (p < 0.001). A significant (p <0.001) correlation exists between the QTc and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), a test of cognitive function. Two studies examined QT variability (the difference between the longest and shortest QT interval on a 12 lead ECG); the OR for QT variability AD vs MCI was 3.858 [random effects model] and 3.712 [fixed effects model] (p < 0.001). When compared to the control group, the OR for QT dispersion in AD was 6.358 [random effects model] or 5.143 ( P< 0.001) [fixed effects model]. A qualitative analysis of the data raised questions about paucity of data defining the nature of the control groups, the pathophysiologic mechanism, and the uniform use of a poor QT heart rate correction factor. The longer QT in AD, greater QT variability in AD, and the direct relationship between QT interval and AD severity supports a brain–heart connection in AD that might be fundamental to aging-induced AD and mortality. Issues with defining the control group, limited number of studies, conflicting data in population studies, and the lack of a strong electrophysiological basis underscore the need for additional research in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging Medicine
Aging Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Psychosocial factors associated with physical activity in people with dementia: A pilot cross-sectional study Respiratory medical quality control system construction in China Iron accumulation/overload and Alzheimer's disease risk factors in the precuneus region: A comprehensive narrative review Short-term mortality among very elderly cancer patients in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1