{"title":"荟萃分析的进展:测量误差校正的统一建模框架","authors":"Betsy Jane Becker, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1111/bmsp.12345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In psychological studies, multivariate outcomes measured on the same individuals are often encountered. Effects originating from these outcomes are consequently dependent. Multivariate meta-analysis examines the relationships of multivariate outcomes by estimating the mean effects and their variance–covariance matrices from series of primary studies. In this paper we discuss a unified modelling framework for multivariate meta-analysis that also incorporates measurement error corrections. We focus on two types of effect sizes, standardized mean differences (<i>d</i>) and correlations (<i>r</i>), that are common in psychological studies. Using generalized least squares estimation, we outline estimated mean vectors and variance–covariance matrices for <i>d</i> and <i>r</i> that are corrected for measurement error. Given the burgeoning research involving multivariate outcomes, and the largely overlooked ramifications of measurement error, we advocate addressing measurement error while conducting multivariate meta-analysis to enhance the replicability of psychological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":55322,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology","volume":"77 3","pages":"395-428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bmsp.12345","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in meta-analysis: A unifying modelling framework with measurement error correction\",\"authors\":\"Betsy Jane Becker, Qian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bmsp.12345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In psychological studies, multivariate outcomes measured on the same individuals are often encountered. Effects originating from these outcomes are consequently dependent. Multivariate meta-analysis examines the relationships of multivariate outcomes by estimating the mean effects and their variance–covariance matrices from series of primary studies. In this paper we discuss a unified modelling framework for multivariate meta-analysis that also incorporates measurement error corrections. We focus on two types of effect sizes, standardized mean differences (<i>d</i>) and correlations (<i>r</i>), that are common in psychological studies. Using generalized least squares estimation, we outline estimated mean vectors and variance–covariance matrices for <i>d</i> and <i>r</i> that are corrected for measurement error. Given the burgeoning research involving multivariate outcomes, and the largely overlooked ramifications of measurement error, we advocate addressing measurement error while conducting multivariate meta-analysis to enhance the replicability of psychological research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"77 3\",\"pages\":\"395-428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bmsp.12345\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bmsp.12345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bmsp.12345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在心理学研究中,经常会遇到对同一个人进行多变量测量的结果。因此,这些结果所产生的效应具有依赖性。多元荟萃分析通过估算一系列主要研究的平均效应及其方差-协方差矩阵来研究多元结果之间的关系。本文讨论了多元荟萃分析的统一建模框架,该框架还包含测量误差校正。我们将重点放在心理学研究中常见的两种效应大小--标准化平均差(d)和相关性(r)。利用广义最小二乘法估计,我们概述了经测量误差校正的 d 和 r 的估计均值向量和方差-协方差矩阵。鉴于涉及多元结果的研究方兴未艾,而测量误差的影响在很大程度上被忽视,我们主张在进行多元荟萃分析时解决测量误差问题,以提高心理学研究的可复制性。
Advances in meta-analysis: A unifying modelling framework with measurement error correction
In psychological studies, multivariate outcomes measured on the same individuals are often encountered. Effects originating from these outcomes are consequently dependent. Multivariate meta-analysis examines the relationships of multivariate outcomes by estimating the mean effects and their variance–covariance matrices from series of primary studies. In this paper we discuss a unified modelling framework for multivariate meta-analysis that also incorporates measurement error corrections. We focus on two types of effect sizes, standardized mean differences (d) and correlations (r), that are common in psychological studies. Using generalized least squares estimation, we outline estimated mean vectors and variance–covariance matrices for d and r that are corrected for measurement error. Given the burgeoning research involving multivariate outcomes, and the largely overlooked ramifications of measurement error, we advocate addressing measurement error while conducting multivariate meta-analysis to enhance the replicability of psychological research.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology publishes articles relating to areas of psychology which have a greater mathematical or statistical aspect of their argument than is usually acceptable to other journals including:
• mathematical psychology
• statistics
• psychometrics
• decision making
• psychophysics
• classification
• relevant areas of mathematics, computing and computer software
These include articles that address substantitive psychological issues or that develop and extend techniques useful to psychologists. New models for psychological processes, new approaches to existing data, critiques of existing models and improved algorithms for estimating the parameters of a model are examples of articles which may be favoured.