利用机器学习模型预测 LPBF 期间熔池深度的新型特征工程方法

IF 4.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Additive manufacturing letters Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100214
Mohammad Hossein Mosallanejad , Hassan Gashmard , Mahdi Javanbakht , Behzad Niroumand , Abdollah Saboori
{"title":"利用机器学习模型预测 LPBF 期间熔池深度的新型特征工程方法","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Mosallanejad ,&nbsp;Hassan Gashmard ,&nbsp;Mahdi Javanbakht ,&nbsp;Behzad Niroumand ,&nbsp;Abdollah Saboori","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Melt pool geometry is a deterministic factor affecting the characteristics of metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) components. The wide array of physical and thermal phenomena involved during the formation of the AM melt pool, along with the great variety of alloy compositions and AM methods, coupled with the clear influence of multiple process parameters, make it difficult to predict the melt pool geometry under a given set of conditions. Therefore, using Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches such as Machine Learning (ML) is necessary for accurate predictions. Using a physics-informed feature selection strategy along with the application of atomic features for the first time, this work aims to offer accurately trained models relying on existing high-fidelity data for most common alloys in AM academia and industry, i.e., 316 L stainless steel, Ti6Al4V, and AlSi10Mg. Multiple ML algorithms were trained, and the results revealed that the average R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE obtained by the K-fold cross-validation (<em>K</em> = 5) were significantly enhanced when laser and material properties, inspired by the analytical models for AM melt pool geometry, were used as the model features. Removing the excess features and applying atomic features further enhanced the accuracy of the models. As a result, R<sup>2</sup> for the XGBoost, CatBoost, and GPR models were 0.907, 0.889, and 0.882, respectively, while the hold-out cross-validation led to 0.978, 0.976, and 0.945, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that the XGBoost model outperforms the Rosenthal equation. This approach provides a pathway to more accurately predict the properties of metal AM components.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000239/pdfft?md5=bd29e5e0479e946efb53b873e042ea15&pid=1-s2.0-S2772369024000239-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel feature engineering approach for predicting melt pool depth during LPBF by machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hossein Mosallanejad ,&nbsp;Hassan Gashmard ,&nbsp;Mahdi Javanbakht ,&nbsp;Behzad Niroumand ,&nbsp;Abdollah Saboori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Melt pool geometry is a deterministic factor affecting the characteristics of metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) components. The wide array of physical and thermal phenomena involved during the formation of the AM melt pool, along with the great variety of alloy compositions and AM methods, coupled with the clear influence of multiple process parameters, make it difficult to predict the melt pool geometry under a given set of conditions. Therefore, using Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches such as Machine Learning (ML) is necessary for accurate predictions. Using a physics-informed feature selection strategy along with the application of atomic features for the first time, this work aims to offer accurately trained models relying on existing high-fidelity data for most common alloys in AM academia and industry, i.e., 316 L stainless steel, Ti6Al4V, and AlSi10Mg. Multiple ML algorithms were trained, and the results revealed that the average R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE obtained by the K-fold cross-validation (<em>K</em> = 5) were significantly enhanced when laser and material properties, inspired by the analytical models for AM melt pool geometry, were used as the model features. Removing the excess features and applying atomic features further enhanced the accuracy of the models. As a result, R<sup>2</sup> for the XGBoost, CatBoost, and GPR models were 0.907, 0.889, and 0.882, respectively, while the hold-out cross-validation led to 0.978, 0.976, and 0.945, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that the XGBoost model outperforms the Rosenthal equation. This approach provides a pathway to more accurately predict the properties of metal AM components.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Additive manufacturing letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000239/pdfft?md5=bd29e5e0479e946efb53b873e042ea15&pid=1-s2.0-S2772369024000239-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Additive manufacturing letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

熔池几何形状是影响金属增材制造 (AM) 部件特性的决定性因素。AM 熔池形成过程中涉及的各种物理和热现象,以及种类繁多的合金成分和 AM 方法,再加上多种工艺参数的明显影响,使得很难预测给定条件下的熔池几何形状。因此,有必要使用人工智能(AI)方法(如机器学习(ML))进行准确预测。这项工作首次使用了物理信息特征选择策略和原子特征应用,旨在根据现有的高保真数据,为 AM 学术界和工业界最常见的合金(即 316 L 不锈钢、Ti6Al4V 和 AlSi10Mg)提供经过精确训练的模型。训练了多种 ML 算法,结果表明,当使用受 AM 熔池几何形状分析模型启发的激光和材料属性作为模型特征时,通过 K 倍交叉验证(K = 5)获得的平均 R2 和 RMSE 显著提高。去除多余特征并应用原子特征进一步提高了模型的准确性。因此,XGBoost、CatBoost 和 GPR 模型的 R2 分别为 0.907、0.889 和 0.882,而保留交叉验证的结果分别为 0.978、0.976 和 0.945。此外,结果显示 XGBoost 模型优于罗森塔尔方程。这种方法为更准确地预测金属 AM 组件的性能提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel feature engineering approach for predicting melt pool depth during LPBF by machine learning models

Melt pool geometry is a deterministic factor affecting the characteristics of metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) components. The wide array of physical and thermal phenomena involved during the formation of the AM melt pool, along with the great variety of alloy compositions and AM methods, coupled with the clear influence of multiple process parameters, make it difficult to predict the melt pool geometry under a given set of conditions. Therefore, using Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches such as Machine Learning (ML) is necessary for accurate predictions. Using a physics-informed feature selection strategy along with the application of atomic features for the first time, this work aims to offer accurately trained models relying on existing high-fidelity data for most common alloys in AM academia and industry, i.e., 316 L stainless steel, Ti6Al4V, and AlSi10Mg. Multiple ML algorithms were trained, and the results revealed that the average R2 and RMSE obtained by the K-fold cross-validation (K = 5) were significantly enhanced when laser and material properties, inspired by the analytical models for AM melt pool geometry, were used as the model features. Removing the excess features and applying atomic features further enhanced the accuracy of the models. As a result, R2 for the XGBoost, CatBoost, and GPR models were 0.907, 0.889, and 0.882, respectively, while the hold-out cross-validation led to 0.978, 0.976, and 0.945, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that the XGBoost model outperforms the Rosenthal equation. This approach provides a pathway to more accurately predict the properties of metal AM components.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing letters
Additive manufacturing letters Materials Science (General), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
期刊最新文献
Modelling process monitoring data in laser powder bed fusion: A pragmatic route to additive manufacturing quality assurance Drop-on-demand 3D printing of programable magnetic composites for soft robotics In-situ heating TEM observation of solidification cell evolutions in an Al-Fe alloy built by laser-powder bed fusion A non-melting additive approach to structural repair of aluminum aircraft fastener holes Enabling tailored microstructures by hybrid directed energy deposition processing of a nickel-based superalloy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1