评估体育活动和休闲久坐行为与慢性阻塞性肺病的因果关系:孟德尔随机研究

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001879
Lu Xiao, Weina Li, Fawei Li, Xingjuan Chen, Yun Xu, Ying Hu, Yingkun Fu, Ling Feng
{"title":"评估体育活动和休闲久坐行为与慢性阻塞性肺病的因果关系:孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Lu Xiao, Weina Li, Fawei Li, Xingjuan Chen, Yun Xu, Ying Hu, Yingkun Fu, Ling Feng","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Observational studies show that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) tend to be sedentary during leisure time. Physical activity (PA) may reduce the risk of COPD, but the causal relationship is unclear. We used a Mendelian randomisation (MR) method to elucidate the association of leisure sedentary behaviours (LSB) and PA with lung function and COPD. Methods Data on LSB (n=422 218), PA (n=608 595), COPD (n=299 929) and lung function (n=79 055) were obtained from the large-scale genome-wide association study. Causal inference used inverse variance-weighted, MR-Egger and weighted median. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and radial MR was used to distinguish outliers. The primary outcome was analysed by multifactorial MR adjusted for daily smoking. Results The inverse variance weighted analysis indicated that increased moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) is associated with higher levels of forced vital capacity (FVC) (beta=0.27, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.42; p=3.51×10–4). For each increment of 2.8 hours in television watching, the odds of COPD were 2.25 times greater (OR=2.25; 95% CI 1.84 to 2.75; p=2.38×10–15). For early-onset COPD, the odds were 2.11 times greater (OR=2.11; 95% CI 1.56 to 2.85; p=1.06×10–6), and for late-onset COPD, the odds were 2.16 times greater (OR=2.16; 95% CI 1.64 to 2.84; p=3.12×10–8). Similarly, the odds of hospitalisation for COPD were 2.02 times greater with increased television watching (OR=2.02; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.55; p=4.68×10–9). Television watching was associated with lower FVC (beta=−0.19, 95% CI −0.28 to −0.10; p=1.54×10–5) and forced expiratory volume in the 1 s (FEV1) (beta=−0.16, 95% CI −0.25 to −0.08; p=1.21×10–4) levels. The results remained significant after adjustment for smoking. Conclusions Our study suggests a potential association with LSB, particularly television watching, is associated with higher odds of COPD and lower indices of lung function as measured continuously, including FEV1 and FVC. Conversely, an increase in MVPA is associated with higher indices of lung function, particularly reflected in increased FVC levels. Data are available in a public, open access repository. All data are from the publicly available GWAS. COPD-related data can be downloaded from <https://www.finngen.fi/en>; physical activity and lung function-related data can be downloaded from <https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the causal role of physical activity and leisure sedentary behaviours with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Mendelian randomisation study\",\"authors\":\"Lu Xiao, Weina Li, Fawei Li, Xingjuan Chen, Yun Xu, Ying Hu, Yingkun Fu, Ling Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Observational studies show that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) tend to be sedentary during leisure time. Physical activity (PA) may reduce the risk of COPD, but the causal relationship is unclear. We used a Mendelian randomisation (MR) method to elucidate the association of leisure sedentary behaviours (LSB) and PA with lung function and COPD. Methods Data on LSB (n=422 218), PA (n=608 595), COPD (n=299 929) and lung function (n=79 055) were obtained from the large-scale genome-wide association study. Causal inference used inverse variance-weighted, MR-Egger and weighted median. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and radial MR was used to distinguish outliers. The primary outcome was analysed by multifactorial MR adjusted for daily smoking. Results The inverse variance weighted analysis indicated that increased moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) is associated with higher levels of forced vital capacity (FVC) (beta=0.27, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.42; p=3.51×10–4). For each increment of 2.8 hours in television watching, the odds of COPD were 2.25 times greater (OR=2.25; 95% CI 1.84 to 2.75; p=2.38×10–15). For early-onset COPD, the odds were 2.11 times greater (OR=2.11; 95% CI 1.56 to 2.85; p=1.06×10–6), and for late-onset COPD, the odds were 2.16 times greater (OR=2.16; 95% CI 1.64 to 2.84; p=3.12×10–8). Similarly, the odds of hospitalisation for COPD were 2.02 times greater with increased television watching (OR=2.02; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.55; p=4.68×10–9). Television watching was associated with lower FVC (beta=−0.19, 95% CI −0.28 to −0.10; p=1.54×10–5) and forced expiratory volume in the 1 s (FEV1) (beta=−0.16, 95% CI −0.25 to −0.08; p=1.21×10–4) levels. The results remained significant after adjustment for smoking. Conclusions Our study suggests a potential association with LSB, particularly television watching, is associated with higher odds of COPD and lower indices of lung function as measured continuously, including FEV1 and FVC. Conversely, an increase in MVPA is associated with higher indices of lung function, particularly reflected in increased FVC levels. Data are available in a public, open access repository. All data are from the publicly available GWAS. COPD-related data can be downloaded from <https://www.finngen.fi/en>; physical activity and lung function-related data can be downloaded from <https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001879\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 观察性研究表明,慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者在闲暇时间往往久坐不动。体力活动(PA)可降低慢性阻塞性肺病的发病风险,但其中的因果关系尚不清楚。我们采用孟德尔随机法(MR)阐明了休闲久坐行为(LSB)和体力活动与肺功能和慢性阻塞性肺病的关系。方法 LSB(n=422 218)、PA(n=608 595)、COPD(n=299 929)和肺功能(n=79 055)的数据来自大规模全基因组关联研究。因果推断使用了反方差加权、MR-Egger 和加权中位数。敏感性分析用于评估异质性和多向性,径向 MR 用于区分异常值。主要结果通过调整每日吸烟量的多因素 MR 进行分析。结果 反方差加权分析表明,中度到剧烈运动(MVPA)的增加与较高水平的强迫生命容量(FVC)相关(β=0.27,95% CI 0.12 至 0.42;p=3.51×10-4)。看电视时间每增加 2.8 小时,患慢性阻塞性肺病的几率就增加 2.25 倍(OR=2.25;95% CI 1.84 至 2.75;P=2.38×10-15)。早发慢性阻塞性肺病的几率是原来的 2.11 倍(OR=2.11;95% CI 1.56 至 2.85;p=1.06×10-6),晚发慢性阻塞性肺病的几率是原来的 2.16 倍(OR=2.16;95% CI 1.64 至 2.84;p=3.12×10-8)。同样,因慢性阻塞性肺病住院的几率是看电视次数增加的 2.02 倍(OR=2.02;95% CI 1.59 至 2.55;p=4.68×10-9)。看电视与较低的肺活量(FVC)(β=-0.19,95% CI -0.28至-0.10;p=1.54×10-5)和1秒内用力呼气容积(FEV1)(β=-0.16,95% CI -0.25至-0.08;p=1.21×10-4)水平相关。在对吸烟进行调整后,结果仍具有显著性。结论 我们的研究表明,LSB(尤其是看电视)与慢性阻塞性肺病的发病几率较高以及连续测量的肺功能指数(包括 FEV1 和 FVC)较低有潜在联系。相反,MVPA 的增加与较高的肺功能指数有关,尤其反映在 FVC 水平的增加上。数据可在公开、开放的资料库中获取。所有数据均来自公开的 GWAS。慢性阻塞性肺病相关数据可从以下网站下载;体力活动和肺功能相关数据可从以下网站下载
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the causal role of physical activity and leisure sedentary behaviours with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Mendelian randomisation study
Background Observational studies show that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) tend to be sedentary during leisure time. Physical activity (PA) may reduce the risk of COPD, but the causal relationship is unclear. We used a Mendelian randomisation (MR) method to elucidate the association of leisure sedentary behaviours (LSB) and PA with lung function and COPD. Methods Data on LSB (n=422 218), PA (n=608 595), COPD (n=299 929) and lung function (n=79 055) were obtained from the large-scale genome-wide association study. Causal inference used inverse variance-weighted, MR-Egger and weighted median. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and radial MR was used to distinguish outliers. The primary outcome was analysed by multifactorial MR adjusted for daily smoking. Results The inverse variance weighted analysis indicated that increased moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) is associated with higher levels of forced vital capacity (FVC) (beta=0.27, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.42; p=3.51×10–4). For each increment of 2.8 hours in television watching, the odds of COPD were 2.25 times greater (OR=2.25; 95% CI 1.84 to 2.75; p=2.38×10–15). For early-onset COPD, the odds were 2.11 times greater (OR=2.11; 95% CI 1.56 to 2.85; p=1.06×10–6), and for late-onset COPD, the odds were 2.16 times greater (OR=2.16; 95% CI 1.64 to 2.84; p=3.12×10–8). Similarly, the odds of hospitalisation for COPD were 2.02 times greater with increased television watching (OR=2.02; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.55; p=4.68×10–9). Television watching was associated with lower FVC (beta=−0.19, 95% CI −0.28 to −0.10; p=1.54×10–5) and forced expiratory volume in the 1 s (FEV1) (beta=−0.16, 95% CI −0.25 to −0.08; p=1.21×10–4) levels. The results remained significant after adjustment for smoking. Conclusions Our study suggests a potential association with LSB, particularly television watching, is associated with higher odds of COPD and lower indices of lung function as measured continuously, including FEV1 and FVC. Conversely, an increase in MVPA is associated with higher indices of lung function, particularly reflected in increased FVC levels. Data are available in a public, open access repository. All data are from the publicly available GWAS. COPD-related data can be downloaded from ; physical activity and lung function-related data can be downloaded from
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Role of ethnicity and residency in active tuberculosis in Karakalpakstan: study protocol of a matched case-control study. Long-term mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring acute non-invasive ventilation with and without obstructive sleep apnoea. High-flow nasal cannula in adults with chronic respiratory diseases during physical exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient perspectives on knowledge gaps in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Ventilator performances for non-invasive ventilation: a bench study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1